Blanca Benito-Pascual, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos, Olivia Rodríguez-Quet, Vittoria Termine, Ricardo Cuiña-Sardiña, David Díaz-Valle
{"title":"Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments and Keratoconus Progression: A Case Series Study.","authors":"Blanca Benito-Pascual, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos, Olivia Rodríguez-Quet, Vittoria Termine, Ricardo Cuiña-Sardiña, David Díaz-Valle","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess keratoconus (KC) progression following the implant of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRSs) in young patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective, longitudinal, observational, controlled nonrandomized case series study. Keratoconus patients aged 25 years or younger who underwent uneventful ICRS surgery and completed at least 3 years of follow-up were enrolled. Controls were of similar age and treatment-naive patients with KC. The following Pentacam imaging (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) data were analyzed: keratometric (maximum, in-flattest meridian, in-steepest meridian, and mean), aberrometric (higher-order aberrations and coma), pachymetric (thinnest corneal thickness), and elevation (maximum posterior elevation). The main outcome measure was KC progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample comprised 20 eyes of 18 cases (age 20.20 ± 3.70 years, nine right eyes, 14 male patients) and 30 eyes of 24 controls (age 20.80 ± 3.20 years, 15 right eyes, 21 male patients). The mean follow-up duration was 4.90 ± 1.70 years (range 3-8 years) for cases and 4.50 ± 1.40 years (range 3-8 years) for controls. Four cases and two controls met criteria for KC progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrastromal corneal ring segments did not have significant impact on KC progression in the cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess keratoconus (KC) progression following the implant of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRSs) in young patients.
Materials and methods: Retrospective, longitudinal, observational, controlled nonrandomized case series study. Keratoconus patients aged 25 years or younger who underwent uneventful ICRS surgery and completed at least 3 years of follow-up were enrolled. Controls were of similar age and treatment-naive patients with KC. The following Pentacam imaging (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) data were analyzed: keratometric (maximum, in-flattest meridian, in-steepest meridian, and mean), aberrometric (higher-order aberrations and coma), pachymetric (thinnest corneal thickness), and elevation (maximum posterior elevation). The main outcome measure was KC progression.
Results: The study sample comprised 20 eyes of 18 cases (age 20.20 ± 3.70 years, nine right eyes, 14 male patients) and 30 eyes of 24 controls (age 20.80 ± 3.20 years, 15 right eyes, 21 male patients). The mean follow-up duration was 4.90 ± 1.70 years (range 3-8 years) for cases and 4.50 ± 1.40 years (range 3-8 years) for controls. Four cases and two controls met criteria for KC progression.
Conclusions: Intrastromal corneal ring segments did not have significant impact on KC progression in the cohort.
期刊介绍:
Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.