Katherine M. Rancaño , Carol Curtin , Aviva Must , Linda G. Bandini
{"title":"Does food selectivity drive differences in dietary resemblance between children with intellectual disabilities and typical development?","authors":"Katherine M. Rancaño , Carol Curtin , Aviva Must , Linda G. Bandini","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although children's dietary intake often resembles that of their parents', dietary resemblance has not been examined among children with intellectual disabilities (ID), where food selectivity is a common parental concern. We compared dietary resemblance in children with typical development (TD), ID, and ID and co-occurring autism (ID + A) in parent-child dyads, and examined whether child food selectivity mediated between-group differences. Dietary data from parents and their children (3–8 years, male = 61.8%, TD = 52.9%, ID = 18.6%, ID + A = 28.4%) were analyzed as mother-child (n = 100) and father-child (n = 70) dyads. Dietary resemblance was operationalized as the proportion of foods that were reported as eaten/not eaten by both parent and child in parent-completed Food Frequency Questionnaires. Food refusal rate was used to capture food selectivity (total foods children would not eat/total foods offered). Among mother-child dyads, dietary resemblance did not differ between children with ID compared to TD (P = 0.243). Among father-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 10% lower in children with ID than TD (66.4% vs. 74.1%, P = 0.032), and the difference was partially explained (mediated) by food refusal. Among mother-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 19% lower among children with ID + A than TD (61.5% vs. 75.6%, P = 0.001), and the difference was completely explained by food refusal. Among father-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 22% lower among children with ID + A than TD (57.9% vs. 74.1%, P < 0.001), and the difference was completely explained by food refusal. Subanalyses by food groups produced similar results. Compared to TD children, dietary resemblance was lower in children with ID + A, but not children with ID, and differences were explained by food selectivity. Our findings suggest parents of children with ID + A may have less influence over their child's dietary intake than parents of children with ID or TD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 107744"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324005488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although children's dietary intake often resembles that of their parents', dietary resemblance has not been examined among children with intellectual disabilities (ID), where food selectivity is a common parental concern. We compared dietary resemblance in children with typical development (TD), ID, and ID and co-occurring autism (ID + A) in parent-child dyads, and examined whether child food selectivity mediated between-group differences. Dietary data from parents and their children (3–8 years, male = 61.8%, TD = 52.9%, ID = 18.6%, ID + A = 28.4%) were analyzed as mother-child (n = 100) and father-child (n = 70) dyads. Dietary resemblance was operationalized as the proportion of foods that were reported as eaten/not eaten by both parent and child in parent-completed Food Frequency Questionnaires. Food refusal rate was used to capture food selectivity (total foods children would not eat/total foods offered). Among mother-child dyads, dietary resemblance did not differ between children with ID compared to TD (P = 0.243). Among father-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 10% lower in children with ID than TD (66.4% vs. 74.1%, P = 0.032), and the difference was partially explained (mediated) by food refusal. Among mother-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 19% lower among children with ID + A than TD (61.5% vs. 75.6%, P = 0.001), and the difference was completely explained by food refusal. Among father-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 22% lower among children with ID + A than TD (57.9% vs. 74.1%, P < 0.001), and the difference was completely explained by food refusal. Subanalyses by food groups produced similar results. Compared to TD children, dietary resemblance was lower in children with ID + A, but not children with ID, and differences were explained by food selectivity. Our findings suggest parents of children with ID + A may have less influence over their child's dietary intake than parents of children with ID or TD.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.