Enhancing preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis: a study on normalized conventional MR imaging parameters.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04652-7
Yuxiao Li, Chenxi Zheng, Yang Zhang, Tianlin He, Wei Chen, Kailian Zheng
{"title":"Enhancing preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis: a study on normalized conventional MR imaging parameters.","authors":"Yuxiao Li, Chenxi Zheng, Yang Zhang, Tianlin He, Wei Chen, Kailian Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04652-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the utility of signal intensity ratio (SIR) in distinguishing between mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), thereby reducing unnecessary pancreatectomies or delayed diagnosis brought by misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 170 participants (34 with MFCP and 136 with PDAC) who underwent radical pancreatic surgery and were diagnosed via specimen pathology. The study group was carefully selected with a 1:4 ratio matching for sex, age, and operation time between two entities. T1 SIR, T2 SIR, arterial phase (AP) SIR, portal venous phase (VP) SIR, delay phase (DP) SIR, DWI<sub>0-50</sub> SIR, and DWI<sub>500-1000</sub> SIR, were calculated by dividing the signal intensity of lesions by that of the paraspinal muscle, serving as a reference organ. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was estimated to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Wilcoxon tests were employed for univariate analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine optimal cutoff points and AUC values for selected predictors. A tenfold cross-validation method was applied to validate the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICC demonstrated excellent correlation for both intraobserver and interobserver(ICCs > 0.8). T1 SIR, AP SIR, VP SIR, and DP SIR were significantly lower in the PDAC group compared to the MFCP group, and exhibited good independent predictive properties with the sensitivities of 61.8, 61.8, 70.6, and 73.5%, specificities of 66.2, 68.4, 59.6, and 55.9%, and AUCs of 0.620, 0.659, 0.670, and 0.668, respectively, hovering around 0.7. The tenfold cross-validation confirmed the reliability and robustness of our findings, with consistent AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals over 1000 iterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>T1 SIR, AP SIR, VP SIR, and DP SIR show promise as potential imaging biomarkers for distinguishing between MFCP and PDAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04652-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the utility of signal intensity ratio (SIR) in distinguishing between mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), thereby reducing unnecessary pancreatectomies or delayed diagnosis brought by misdiagnosis.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 170 participants (34 with MFCP and 136 with PDAC) who underwent radical pancreatic surgery and were diagnosed via specimen pathology. The study group was carefully selected with a 1:4 ratio matching for sex, age, and operation time between two entities. T1 SIR, T2 SIR, arterial phase (AP) SIR, portal venous phase (VP) SIR, delay phase (DP) SIR, DWI0-50 SIR, and DWI500-1000 SIR, were calculated by dividing the signal intensity of lesions by that of the paraspinal muscle, serving as a reference organ. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was estimated to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Wilcoxon tests were employed for univariate analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine optimal cutoff points and AUC values for selected predictors. A tenfold cross-validation method was applied to validate the robustness of the results.

Results: The ICC demonstrated excellent correlation for both intraobserver and interobserver(ICCs > 0.8). T1 SIR, AP SIR, VP SIR, and DP SIR were significantly lower in the PDAC group compared to the MFCP group, and exhibited good independent predictive properties with the sensitivities of 61.8, 61.8, 70.6, and 73.5%, specificities of 66.2, 68.4, 59.6, and 55.9%, and AUCs of 0.620, 0.659, 0.670, and 0.668, respectively, hovering around 0.7. The tenfold cross-validation confirmed the reliability and robustness of our findings, with consistent AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals over 1000 iterations.

Conclusion: T1 SIR, AP SIR, VP SIR, and DP SIR show promise as potential imaging biomarkers for distinguishing between MFCP and PDAC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强胰腺导管腺癌和肿块型慢性胰腺炎的术前诊断:一项关于归一化常规磁共振成像参数的研究。
目的:评估信号强度比(SIR)在区分肿块型慢性胰腺炎(MFCP)和胰管腺癌(PDAC)方面的作用,从而减少不必要的胰腺切除术或因误诊而导致的延误诊断:这项回顾性研究纳入了 170 名接受胰腺根治术并通过标本病理确诊的患者(34 名 MFCP 患者和 136 名 PDAC 患者)。研究小组经过精心挑选,两组患者的性别、年龄和手术时间比例为 1:4。通过将病灶的信号强度除以作为参考器官的脊柱旁肌肉的信号强度,计算出T1 SIR、T2 SIR、动脉期(AP)SIR、门静脉期(VP)SIR、延迟期(DP)SIR、DWI0-50 SIR和DWI500-1000 SIR。通过估算类内相关系数(ICC)来评估观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性。采用 Wilcoxon 检验进行单变量分析,并生成接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线,以确定选定预测因子的最佳临界点和 AUC 值。采用十倍交叉验证法来验证结果的稳健性:结果:ICC 在观察者内和观察者间均显示出极好的相关性(ICC > 0.8)。与MFCP组相比,PDAC组的T1 SIR、AP SIR、VP SIR和DP SIR明显降低,并表现出良好的独立预测性,灵敏度分别为61.8%、61.8%、70.6%和73.5%,特异度分别为66.2%、68.4%、59.6%和55.9%,AUC分别为0.620、0.659、0.670和0.668,徘徊在0.7左右。十倍交叉验证证实了我们研究结果的可靠性和稳健性,其AUC、灵敏度、特异性和95%置信区间在1000次迭代中保持一致:结论:T1 SIR、AP SIR、VP SIR和DP SIR有望成为区分MFCP和PDAC的潜在影像生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Renovascular hypertension - a primer for the radiologist. Assessment of high-risk gastroesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients using quantitative parameters from dual-source dual-energy CT. Dynamic changes of radiological and radiomics patterns based on MRI in viable hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization. Enhancing bone metastasis prediction in prostate cancer using quantitative mpMRI features, ISUP grade and PSA density: a machine learning approach. Exam quality of ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced abbreviated MRI and impact on early-stage HCC detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1