Helen Woolcock Martinez, Noora Haghighi, Anne-Sophie van Wingerden, Michael Kirschner, Whitney Alexandra Booker, Natalie A Bello, Nils Petersen, Eliza Miller
{"title":"Continuous versus Intermittent Blood Pressure Monitoring in Postpartum Preeclampsia with Severe Features.","authors":"Helen Woolcock Martinez, Noora Haghighi, Anne-Sophie van Wingerden, Michael Kirschner, Whitney Alexandra Booker, Natalie A Bello, Nils Petersen, Eliza Miller","doi":"10.1055/a-2457-2781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we piloted the use of continuous 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring in postpartum patients with preeclampsia with severe features.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We measured continuous BP for up to 24 hours using finger plethysmography. We also used an oscillometric device to measure brachial BP per usual clinical protocol (intermittent BP) during the same monitoring period. Using a paired t-test, we compared mean BP values assessed using intermittent and continuous methods and, using McNemar's test, we compared the proportion of patients with sustained severe range BP using each BP measurement method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in mean systolic BP (SBP) and mean arterial pressure between intermittent and continuous BP measurements. Intermittently recorded mean diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly higher than continuously recorded DBP. Eleven participants (44%) had sustained SBP ≥160 mmHg using continuous monitoring compared to 2 using intermittent monitoring (p=0.003) and of these 11 participants, 3 (37%) also had recorded sustained DBP ≥ 110 mmHg using continuous monitoring compared to none using intermittent monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous BP monitoring is a feasible and reliable method for detecting sustained severe range BP in postpartum patients receiving treatment for preeclampsia with severe features.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2457-2781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we piloted the use of continuous 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring in postpartum patients with preeclampsia with severe features.
Study design: We measured continuous BP for up to 24 hours using finger plethysmography. We also used an oscillometric device to measure brachial BP per usual clinical protocol (intermittent BP) during the same monitoring period. Using a paired t-test, we compared mean BP values assessed using intermittent and continuous methods and, using McNemar's test, we compared the proportion of patients with sustained severe range BP using each BP measurement method.
Results: A total of 25 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in mean systolic BP (SBP) and mean arterial pressure between intermittent and continuous BP measurements. Intermittently recorded mean diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly higher than continuously recorded DBP. Eleven participants (44%) had sustained SBP ≥160 mmHg using continuous monitoring compared to 2 using intermittent monitoring (p=0.003) and of these 11 participants, 3 (37%) also had recorded sustained DBP ≥ 110 mmHg using continuous monitoring compared to none using intermittent monitoring.
Conclusion: Continuous BP monitoring is a feasible and reliable method for detecting sustained severe range BP in postpartum patients receiving treatment for preeclampsia with severe features.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.