Barriers and facilitators of collaboration during the implementation of vocational rehabilitation interventions: a systematic review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06223-y
Yvonne Noteboom, Alexandra W A Montanus, Femke van Nassau, George Burchell, Johannes R Anema, Maaike A Huysmans
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators of collaboration during the implementation of vocational rehabilitation interventions: a systematic review.","authors":"Yvonne Noteboom, Alexandra W A Montanus, Femke van Nassau, George Burchell, Johannes R Anema, Maaike A Huysmans","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06223-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stakeholders from the mental health care sector and the social security sector are often involved in the implementation of vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions, so-called coordinated or integrated program, as clients need support from both fields. Collaboration of the involved stakeholders from both sectors is therefore important. In this study, a review was performed to provide an overview of the barriers and facilitators for collaboration during the implementation of coordinated or integrated vocational rehabilitation interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review (PROSPERO ID CRD42023404823) was performed in the databases of Medline PubMed (n = 11.511), Web of Science (n = 4821), and PSYCINFO (n = 368). We used the AI-driven tool ASReview to support the screening process, conducted by two researchers independently. A thematic content analysis was performed to analyse the reported barriers and facilitators. Appraisal of the quality of included studies was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 105 of the 11,873 identified articles for full text screening, of which 26 were included for final analysis. Six themes of barriers and facilitators were found: attitude and beliefs, engagement and trust, governance and structure, practical issues, professionals involved, and client-centeredness. We found a reporting quality between 8 and 20, based on CASP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that a positive attitude towards and belief of those involved in collaboration during coordinated of integrated VR interventions can enhance collaboration. Moreover, a negative attitude or lack of trust, most often found among mental health professionals, hindered collaboration. Collaboration between stakeholders from different sectors could be increased by improving positive attitudes and mutual trust and increasing knowledge about each other's expertise. Also sharing success stories, co-location of professionals, and having a clear governance were found to be a factor in collaborations' success.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06223-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stakeholders from the mental health care sector and the social security sector are often involved in the implementation of vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions, so-called coordinated or integrated program, as clients need support from both fields. Collaboration of the involved stakeholders from both sectors is therefore important. In this study, a review was performed to provide an overview of the barriers and facilitators for collaboration during the implementation of coordinated or integrated vocational rehabilitation interventions.

Methods: A systematic review (PROSPERO ID CRD42023404823) was performed in the databases of Medline PubMed (n = 11.511), Web of Science (n = 4821), and PSYCINFO (n = 368). We used the AI-driven tool ASReview to support the screening process, conducted by two researchers independently. A thematic content analysis was performed to analyse the reported barriers and facilitators. Appraisal of the quality of included studies was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).

Results: We included 105 of the 11,873 identified articles for full text screening, of which 26 were included for final analysis. Six themes of barriers and facilitators were found: attitude and beliefs, engagement and trust, governance and structure, practical issues, professionals involved, and client-centeredness. We found a reporting quality between 8 and 20, based on CASP.

Conclusion: We found that a positive attitude towards and belief of those involved in collaboration during coordinated of integrated VR interventions can enhance collaboration. Moreover, a negative attitude or lack of trust, most often found among mental health professionals, hindered collaboration. Collaboration between stakeholders from different sectors could be increased by improving positive attitudes and mutual trust and increasing knowledge about each other's expertise. Also sharing success stories, co-location of professionals, and having a clear governance were found to be a factor in collaborations' success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业康复干预措施实施过程中的合作障碍与促进因素:系统综述。
背景:在实施职业康复(VR)干预措施(即所谓的协调或综合计划)时,精神卫生保健部门和社会保障部门的利益相关者通常都会参与其中,因为客户需要这两个领域的支持。因此,这两个部门的相关人员之间的合作非常重要。本研究对协调或综合职业康复干预措施实施过程中的合作障碍和促进因素进行了综述:在 Medline PubMed(n = 11.511)、Web of Science(n = 4821)和 PSYCINFO(n = 368)数据库中进行了系统性综述(PROSPERO ID CRD42023404823)。我们使用人工智能驱动工具 ASReview 支持筛选过程,由两名研究人员独立完成。我们对报告的障碍和促进因素进行了专题内容分析。使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)对纳入研究的质量进行了评估:我们对 11,873 篇已确认文章中的 105 篇进行了全文筛选,其中 26 篇被纳入最终分析。我们发现了六个关于障碍和促进因素的主题:态度和信念、参与和信任、管理和结构、实际问题、参与的专业人员以及以客户为中心。根据 CASP,我们发现报告质量介于 8 和 20 之间:我们发现,在协调综合性虚拟现实干预过程中,参与合作者的积极态度和信念可以促进合作。此外,消极态度或缺乏信任(最常见于心理健康专业人员)会阻碍合作。通过改善积极态度和相互信任,增加对彼此专业知识的了解,可以加强不同部门利益相关者之间的合作。此外,分享成功案例、专业人员合用同一地点以及明确的管理也是合作取得成功的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Japanese teenage suicide attempters: a retrospective study comparing suicide attempters with young adults. Developing and testing Advance Choice Document implementation resources for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission. Differential association between childhood trauma subtypes and neurocognitive performance in adults with major depression. Experiences of undergoing internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for climate change-related distress: a qualitative study. Gender differences and mental distress during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1