A silent pandemic of violence against providers in obstetrics and gynecology: A mixed-methods study based on a global survey.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15985
Margit Endler, Atziri Ramirez-Negrin, Rubina Sohail
{"title":"A silent pandemic of violence against providers in obstetrics and gynecology: A mixed-methods study based on a global survey.","authors":"Margit Endler, Atziri Ramirez-Negrin, Rubina Sohail","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify and qualify the experience of workplace violence (WPV) in a global sample of providers in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a mixed-methods analysis on data from a global survey. Survey content was designed around categorical and open-ended questions in relation to WPV; the occurrence and character, the physical and psychological consequences, training and support structures, and perceived triggers of the experience of WPV. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and text data using mixed deductive-inductive content analysis. These data were integrated using convergent joint display.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2023 and January 2024, survey responses were collected from 77 individual countries. Among the final sample, 764/1016 (75.2%) had experienced WPV, 699/1016 (68.8%) verbal, and 123/1016 (12.1%) physical violence. The violence affected physical health, psychological health, or job satisfaction for 106/764 (13.9%), 36/7642 (47.4%), and 222/764 (29.1%) of individuals respectively; 216/764 (28.3%) received support. Main WPV triggers were staff shortages, lack of security personnel, and long waiting times, identified by 38.8%, 37.5%, and 37.3% of respondents respectively. Qualitative data indicated that violence caused severe and long-lasting suffering. Catalysts for WPV were often reported as complex interplays between unmet or unrealistic expectations and insufficient resources. Lack of support for WPV was explained as violence being \"part of the job\" and a culture of assumed resilience among providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WPV against OBGYN providers seems to be ubiquitous, arises from a complex interplay of factors, and causes significant injury while receiving insufficient mitigation and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify and qualify the experience of workplace violence (WPV) in a global sample of providers in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN).

Methods: We performed a mixed-methods analysis on data from a global survey. Survey content was designed around categorical and open-ended questions in relation to WPV; the occurrence and character, the physical and psychological consequences, training and support structures, and perceived triggers of the experience of WPV. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and text data using mixed deductive-inductive content analysis. These data were integrated using convergent joint display.

Results: Between October 2023 and January 2024, survey responses were collected from 77 individual countries. Among the final sample, 764/1016 (75.2%) had experienced WPV, 699/1016 (68.8%) verbal, and 123/1016 (12.1%) physical violence. The violence affected physical health, psychological health, or job satisfaction for 106/764 (13.9%), 36/7642 (47.4%), and 222/764 (29.1%) of individuals respectively; 216/764 (28.3%) received support. Main WPV triggers were staff shortages, lack of security personnel, and long waiting times, identified by 38.8%, 37.5%, and 37.3% of respondents respectively. Qualitative data indicated that violence caused severe and long-lasting suffering. Catalysts for WPV were often reported as complex interplays between unmet or unrealistic expectations and insufficient resources. Lack of support for WPV was explained as violence being "part of the job" and a culture of assumed resilience among providers.

Conclusion: WPV against OBGYN providers seems to be ubiquitous, arises from a complex interplay of factors, and causes significant injury while receiving insufficient mitigation and support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对妇产科医护人员的暴力无声流行:基于全球调查的混合方法研究。
目的对全球妇产科(OBGYN)服务提供者的工作场所暴力(WPV)经历进行量化和定性:我们对一项全球调查的数据进行了混合方法分析。调查内容围绕与 WPV 相关的分类问题和开放式问题设计;WPV 的发生和特点、生理和心理后果、培训和支持结构,以及 WPV 体验的感知触发因素。定量数据采用描述性统计方法进行分析,文本数据采用演绎-归纳混合内容分析方法进行分析。结果:在 2023 年 10 月至 2024 年 1 月期间,从 77 个国家收集到了调查回复。在最终样本中,764/1016(75.2%)人遭受过 WPV,699/1016(68.8%)人遭受过语言暴力,123/1016(12.1%)人遭受过身体暴力。分别有 106/764(13.9%)、36/7642(47.4%)和 222/764(29.1%)人的身体健康、心理健康或工作满意度受到暴力影响;216/764(28.3%)人获得了支持。38.8% 的受访者、37.5% 的受访者和 37.3% 的受访者分别指出,引发 WPV 的主要因素是人员短缺、缺乏安保人员和等待时间过长。定性数据显示,暴力事件造成了严重而持久的痛苦。据报告,导致妇女遭受暴力侵害的因素往往是未满足或不切实际的期望与资源不足之间复杂的相互作用。缺乏对 WPV 的支持被解释为暴力是 "工作的一部分",以及在医疗服务提供者中存在一种假定的复原力文化:针对妇产科医疗服务提供者的 WPV 似乎无处不在,是由各种复杂的因素相互作用造成的,在造成严重伤害的同时却没有得到足够的缓解和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study. Proposal for a new classification of intrauterine adhesions by sites. Retraction: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of a Cervical Traction Maneuver (Amr's Maneuver) on the Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Retracted: Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1