Dissolution profiles of high-dose salt-form drugs in bicarbonate buffer and phosphate buffer.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Journal of pharmaceutical sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.xphs.2024.10.025
Yuki Tarumi, Kiyohiko Sugano
{"title":"Dissolution profiles of high-dose salt-form drugs in bicarbonate buffer and phosphate buffer.","authors":"Yuki Tarumi, Kiyohiko Sugano","doi":"10.1016/j.xphs.2024.10.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the present study was to compare the dissolution profiles of high-dose salt-form drugs in bicarbonate buffer (BCB) and phosphate buffer (PPB) focusing on the pH changes in the bulk phase. The pH titration curves of BCB and PPB (pH 6.5, buffer capacity (β) = 4.4 mmol/L/pH unit) were first theoretically calculated and experimentally validated. For dissolution tests, six drug salts with an acid counterion, one drug salt with a weak base counterion, and one free acid drug were employed (125-800 mg clinical dose). The dose/fluid volume ratio (Dose/FV) was aligned with the clinical condition. In the pH titration study, the pH value decreased below pH 6.0 by adding HCl > 2.8 mmol/L (BCB) or > 1.6 mmol/L (PPB) and increased above pH 7.0 by adding NaOH > 2.0 mmol/L (BCB) or > 2.4 mmol/L (PPB). In the dissolution test, even though the initial pH and β values were the same, the pH value at 4 h was lower in PPB than in BCB in all cases. For the drug salts with an acid counterion, the area under the dissolution curve was 1.2 to 2.6-fold lower in BCB than in PPB. A marked precipitation process was observed in BCB, but less pronounced or absent in PPB. The results of this study suggest the use of BCB and a clinically equivalent Dose/FV may be valuable in predicting the oral absorption of high-dose drug salts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2024.10.025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the dissolution profiles of high-dose salt-form drugs in bicarbonate buffer (BCB) and phosphate buffer (PPB) focusing on the pH changes in the bulk phase. The pH titration curves of BCB and PPB (pH 6.5, buffer capacity (β) = 4.4 mmol/L/pH unit) were first theoretically calculated and experimentally validated. For dissolution tests, six drug salts with an acid counterion, one drug salt with a weak base counterion, and one free acid drug were employed (125-800 mg clinical dose). The dose/fluid volume ratio (Dose/FV) was aligned with the clinical condition. In the pH titration study, the pH value decreased below pH 6.0 by adding HCl > 2.8 mmol/L (BCB) or > 1.6 mmol/L (PPB) and increased above pH 7.0 by adding NaOH > 2.0 mmol/L (BCB) or > 2.4 mmol/L (PPB). In the dissolution test, even though the initial pH and β values were the same, the pH value at 4 h was lower in PPB than in BCB in all cases. For the drug salts with an acid counterion, the area under the dissolution curve was 1.2 to 2.6-fold lower in BCB than in PPB. A marked precipitation process was observed in BCB, but less pronounced or absent in PPB. The results of this study suggest the use of BCB and a clinically equivalent Dose/FV may be valuable in predicting the oral absorption of high-dose drug salts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高剂量盐形式药物在碳酸氢盐缓冲液和磷酸盐缓冲液中的溶解曲线。
本研究的目的是比较大剂量盐形式药物在碳酸氢盐缓冲液(BCB)和磷酸盐缓冲液(PPB)中的溶出曲线,重点关注体相中的 pH 值变化。首先对 BCB 和 PPB(pH 值为 6.5,缓冲能力 (β) = 4.4 mmol/L/pH 单位)的 pH 滴定曲线进行了理论计算和实验验证。溶解试验采用了六种含酸性反离子的药物盐、一种含弱碱反离子的药物盐和一种游离酸性药物(临床剂量为 125 至 800 毫克)。剂量/液体体积比(Dose/FV)与临床情况一致。在 pH 滴定研究中,加入 HCl > 2.8 mmol/L(BCB)或 > 1.6 mmol/L(PPB)时,pH 值下降至 pH 6.0 以下;加入 NaOH > 2.0 mmol/L(BCB)或 > 2.4 mmol/L(PPB)时,pH 值上升至 pH 7.0 以上。在溶解试验中,尽管初始 pH 值和 β 值相同,但在所有情况下,PPB 在 4 小时后的 pH 值均低于 BCB。对于含有酸性反离子的药物盐,BCB 的溶解曲线下面积比 PPB 低 1.2 至 2.6 倍。在 BCB 中观察到明显的沉淀过程,而在 PPB 中则不明显或没有沉淀。本研究结果表明,使用 BCB 和临床等效剂量/FV 可能对预测大剂量药物盐的口服吸收很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
367
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences will publish original research papers, original research notes, invited topical reviews (including Minireviews), and editorial commentary and news. The area of focus shall be concepts in basic pharmaceutical science and such topics as chemical processing of pharmaceuticals, including crystallization, lyophilization, chemical stability of drugs, pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutics, pharmacodynamics, pro-drug developments, metabolic disposition of bioactive agents, dosage form design, protein-peptide chemistry and biotechnology specifically as these relate to pharmaceutical technology, and targeted drug delivery.
期刊最新文献
A Workflow for Accurate and Consistent Quantitation of Host Cell Proteins by SWATH LC-MS/MS Analysis to Support Process Development. Controlled Self-Assembly of Macrocyclic Peptide into Multifunctional Photoluminescent Nanoparticles. Limitation of Anion Exchange Chromatography and Potential Application of Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography for Monitoring AAV9 Capsid Degradation Upon Thermal Stress. Ultrasound/Magnetic Resonance Bimodal Imaging-Guided CD20-Targeted Multifunctional Nanoplatform for Photothermal/Chemo Synergistic Therapy of B-Cell Lymphoma. Highly Sensitive and Robust LC-MS/MS Method for Determination up to 15 Small Molecule Nitrosamine Impurities in Pharmaceutical Drug Substances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1