Providing early access to geriatric oncology services in a regional cancer centre – A two-year experience in the establishment of a Geriatric Oncology Nurse Navigator Model

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of geriatric oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102145
Sebastian Kang , Sally Allen , Amy Brown , Dinuka Ariyarathna , Sabe Sabesan , Corinne Ryan , Suresh Varma , Zulfiquer Otty , Abhishek Joshi , Shivanshan Pathmanathan
{"title":"Providing early access to geriatric oncology services in a regional cancer centre – A two-year experience in the establishment of a Geriatric Oncology Nurse Navigator Model","authors":"Sebastian Kang ,&nbsp;Sally Allen ,&nbsp;Amy Brown ,&nbsp;Dinuka Ariyarathna ,&nbsp;Sabe Sabesan ,&nbsp;Corinne Ryan ,&nbsp;Suresh Varma ,&nbsp;Zulfiquer Otty ,&nbsp;Abhishek Joshi ,&nbsp;Shivanshan Pathmanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Older patients with cancer often face increased risks of adverse reactions and complications when undergoing systemic therapy. In 2020, the Townsville Cancer Centre in North Queensland established a nurse navigator led geriatric oncology service for patients aged 75 years and above referred for systemic therapy for solid organ malignancy. This study sought to evaluate the safety outcomes and trends in the administration of systemic therapy in older patients following the introduction of this service.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted at a single centre, focusing on patients aged 75 years and above referred for chemotherapy or immunotherapy for solid organ malignancies. Patients referred after the implementation of the service were classified as the geriatric assessment cohort, while those referred before were categorized as the historical cohort. Outcome measures included unplanned hospital admissions, duration of hospital stays, rates of systemic therapy de-escalation, and frailty identified during geriatric assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 129 patients, with 60 in the geriatric assessment cohort and 69 in the historical cohort. The geriatric assessment cohort exhibited a significant decrease in both the average number of hospital admissions per patient compared to the historical cohort (0.59 vs. 1.13, <em>p</em> = 0.01) and the average length of hospital stay (4.3 days vs. 6.7 days, <em>p</em> = 0.04). Rates of systemic therapy de-escalation were comparable between the two cohorts (47 % vs. 59 %, <em>p</em> = 0.16). Frailty was frequently identified during geriatric assessments, requiring intervention both before and during treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our two-year observation of the nurse navigator-led geriatric oncology model suggests that it contributed to improved safety outcomes, leading to reductions in unplanned hospitalizations and lengths of hospital stays, without significant changes in the rates of de-escalated systemic therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"Article 102145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406824004181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Older patients with cancer often face increased risks of adverse reactions and complications when undergoing systemic therapy. In 2020, the Townsville Cancer Centre in North Queensland established a nurse navigator led geriatric oncology service for patients aged 75 years and above referred for systemic therapy for solid organ malignancy. This study sought to evaluate the safety outcomes and trends in the administration of systemic therapy in older patients following the introduction of this service.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at a single centre, focusing on patients aged 75 years and above referred for chemotherapy or immunotherapy for solid organ malignancies. Patients referred after the implementation of the service were classified as the geriatric assessment cohort, while those referred before were categorized as the historical cohort. Outcome measures included unplanned hospital admissions, duration of hospital stays, rates of systemic therapy de-escalation, and frailty identified during geriatric assessments.

Results

The study included 129 patients, with 60 in the geriatric assessment cohort and 69 in the historical cohort. The geriatric assessment cohort exhibited a significant decrease in both the average number of hospital admissions per patient compared to the historical cohort (0.59 vs. 1.13, p = 0.01) and the average length of hospital stay (4.3 days vs. 6.7 days, p = 0.04). Rates of systemic therapy de-escalation were comparable between the two cohorts (47 % vs. 59 %, p = 0.16). Frailty was frequently identified during geriatric assessments, requiring intervention both before and during treatment.

Discussion

Our two-year observation of the nurse navigator-led geriatric oncology model suggests that it contributed to improved safety outcomes, leading to reductions in unplanned hospitalizations and lengths of hospital stays, without significant changes in the rates of de-escalated systemic therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在地区癌症中心提供早期老年肿瘤学服务--建立老年肿瘤学护士导航模式的两年经验。
简介老年癌症患者在接受系统治疗时,往往会面临更高的不良反应和并发症风险。2020年,北昆士兰州汤斯维尔癌症中心(Townsville Cancer Centre)为75岁及以上转诊接受全身治疗的实体器官恶性肿瘤患者设立了由护士导航员领导的老年肿瘤学服务。本研究旨在评估引入该服务后老年患者接受系统治疗的安全结果和趋势:在一家中心开展了一项回顾性研究,主要针对因实体器官恶性肿瘤转诊接受化疗或免疫疗法的 75 岁及以上患者。实施该服务后转诊的患者被归类为老年评估队列,而之前转诊的患者被归类为历史队列。结果指标包括非计划入院率、住院时间、系统疗法降级率以及老年病评估中发现的虚弱情况:研究共纳入了 129 名患者,其中 60 人属于老年评估队列,69 人属于历史队列。与历史队列相比,老年医学评估队列中每位患者的平均入院次数(0.59 对 1.13,p = 0.01)和平均住院时间(4.3 天对 6.7 天,p = 0.04)均显著减少。两组患者放弃系统治疗的比例相当(47% 对 59%,p = 0.16)。在老年病评估过程中经常发现体弱现象,需要在治疗前和治疗过程中进行干预:讨论:我们对以护士导航员为主导的老年肿瘤治疗模式进行了为期两年的观察,结果表明,该模式有助于改善安全结果,从而减少了非计划住院和住院时间,但系统治疗的降级率并未发生显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Potential drug-drug interactions between cancer therapies and active antiretroviral treatments among Medicare-enrolled patients with cancer and HIV. Designing observational studies to estimate treatment effects in geriatric oncology: A closer look at confounding and its mitigation. Emotional impact of cancer from a patient's perspective. Systemic and procedural challenges in transitioning patients with cancer to post-acute and long-term care facilities: A prospective mixed-methods study. The role of healthcare professionals' attitudes in treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1