Assessment of Urolithin A effects on muscle endurance, strength, inflammation, oxidative stress, and protein metabolism in male athletes with resistance training: an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1080/15502783.2024.2419388
Haotian Zhao, Hongkang Zhu, Hezhang Yun, Jingqi Liu, Ge Song, Jin Teng, Dixin Zou, Naiyan Lu, Chang Liu
{"title":"Assessment of Urolithin A effects on muscle endurance, strength, inflammation, oxidative stress, and protein metabolism in male athletes with resistance training: an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.","authors":"Haotian Zhao, Hongkang Zhu, Hezhang Yun, Jingqi Liu, Ge Song, Jin Teng, Dixin Zou, Naiyan Lu, Chang Liu","doi":"10.1080/15502783.2024.2419388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of Urolithin A (UA) on muscle endurance, muscle strength, inflammatory levels, oxidative stress, and protein metabolism status in resistance-trained male athletes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with twenty resistance-trained male athletes. Participants were supplemented with 1 g of UA daily. Muscle strength and muscle endurance measures were assessed, and fasting venous blood samples and morning urine samples were collected to evaluate their oxidative stress levels, inflammatory markers, and protein metabolism status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences observed in terms of dietary energy intake and composition between the two assessments conducted within a 24-hour period. After 8 weeks of UA supplementation, compared to baseline measurements, the UA group exhibited increases in 1RM bench press and squat, although these changes were not statistically significant (Δ = 3.00 ± 0.17 kg, <i>p</i> = 0.051, Δ = 1.35 ± 2.73 kg, <i>p</i> = 0.499). However, significant improvements were noted in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) and repetitions to failure (RTF) performance (Δ = 36.10 ± 0.62 NM, <i>p</i> = 0.000; Δ = 2.00 ± 0.56, <i>p</i> = 0.001). When compared to the placebo group, the UA supplementation for 8 weeks led to an increase in 1RM bench press and squat, although statistical significance was not reached (Δ = 3.50 ± 0.79 kg, <i>p</i> = 0.462; Δ = 2.55 ± 1.36 kg, <i>p</i> = 0.710). Furthermore, the group receiving UA supplementation, compared to the placebo group, showed significant improvements in MVIC and RTF (Δ = 43.50 ± 0.77 NM, <i>p</i> = 0.048; Δ = 2.00 ± 1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.011), indicating that the UA group exhibited superior performance enhancements in these metrics compared to the placebo group. After 8 weeks of UA supplementation, the UA group showed a significant decrease in 3-methylhistidine (3-MH) compared to baseline measurement (Δ=-2.38 ± 1.96 μmol/L, <i>p</i> = 0.049). Additionally, the UA group exhibited a significant increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) compared to baseline (Δ = 0.71 ± 0.21 mg/L, <i>p</i> = 0.001). However, there was no significant changes observed in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) (Δ=-1.00 ± 1.01 pg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.076), or superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Δ=-0.004 ± 0.72 U/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.996) compared to baseline in the UA group. When compared to the placebo group, there was no significant difference observed in 3-MH in the UA group (Δ=-3.20 ± 0.31 μmol/L, <i>p</i> = 0.36). In terms of inflammation markers, the UA group exhibited a significant decrease in CRP (Δ=-0.79 ± 0.38 mg/L, <i>p</i> = 0.032) compared to the placebo group, whereas there was a decrease in IL-6 without statistical significance (Δ=-1.75 ± 0.45 pg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.215). Furthermore, the UA group showed a significant decrease in SOD compared to the placebo group (Δ=-4.32 ± 0.90 U/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After 8 weeks of UA supplementation at 1 g/day, resistance-trained male athletes showed improvements in muscle strength and endurance. Additionally, UA supplementation was also associated with reduced oxidative stress levels and a decrease in inflammation response levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":17400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition","volume":"21 1","pages":"2419388"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2024.2419388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the impact of Urolithin A (UA) on muscle endurance, muscle strength, inflammatory levels, oxidative stress, and protein metabolism status in resistance-trained male athletes.

Method: An 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with twenty resistance-trained male athletes. Participants were supplemented with 1 g of UA daily. Muscle strength and muscle endurance measures were assessed, and fasting venous blood samples and morning urine samples were collected to evaluate their oxidative stress levels, inflammatory markers, and protein metabolism status.

Results: There were no significant differences observed in terms of dietary energy intake and composition between the two assessments conducted within a 24-hour period. After 8 weeks of UA supplementation, compared to baseline measurements, the UA group exhibited increases in 1RM bench press and squat, although these changes were not statistically significant (Δ = 3.00 ± 0.17 kg, p = 0.051, Δ = 1.35 ± 2.73 kg, p = 0.499). However, significant improvements were noted in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) and repetitions to failure (RTF) performance (Δ = 36.10 ± 0.62 NM, p = 0.000; Δ = 2.00 ± 0.56, p = 0.001). When compared to the placebo group, the UA supplementation for 8 weeks led to an increase in 1RM bench press and squat, although statistical significance was not reached (Δ = 3.50 ± 0.79 kg, p = 0.462; Δ = 2.55 ± 1.36 kg, p = 0.710). Furthermore, the group receiving UA supplementation, compared to the placebo group, showed significant improvements in MVIC and RTF (Δ = 43.50 ± 0.77 NM, p = 0.048; Δ = 2.00 ± 1.22, p = 0.011), indicating that the UA group exhibited superior performance enhancements in these metrics compared to the placebo group. After 8 weeks of UA supplementation, the UA group showed a significant decrease in 3-methylhistidine (3-MH) compared to baseline measurement (Δ=-2.38 ± 1.96 μmol/L, p = 0.049). Additionally, the UA group exhibited a significant increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) compared to baseline (Δ = 0.71 ± 0.21 mg/L, p = 0.001). However, there was no significant changes observed in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) (Δ=-1.00 ± 1.01 pg/mL, p = 0.076), or superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Δ=-0.004 ± 0.72 U/mL, p = 0.996) compared to baseline in the UA group. When compared to the placebo group, there was no significant difference observed in 3-MH in the UA group (Δ=-3.20 ± 0.31 μmol/L, p = 0.36). In terms of inflammation markers, the UA group exhibited a significant decrease in CRP (Δ=-0.79 ± 0.38 mg/L, p = 0.032) compared to the placebo group, whereas there was a decrease in IL-6 without statistical significance (Δ=-1.75 ± 0.45 pg/mL, p = 0.215). Furthermore, the UA group showed a significant decrease in SOD compared to the placebo group (Δ=-4.32 ± 0.90 U/mL, p = 0.041).

Conclusions: After 8 weeks of UA supplementation at 1 g/day, resistance-trained male athletes showed improvements in muscle strength and endurance. Additionally, UA supplementation was also associated with reduced oxidative stress levels and a decrease in inflammation response levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估卵磷脂 A 对阻力训练中男性运动员肌肉耐力、力量、炎症、氧化应激和蛋白质代谢的影响:一项为期 8 周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
研究背景本研究旨在探讨尿磷脂 A(UA)对阻力训练男性运动员的肌肉耐力、肌肉力量、炎症水平、氧化应激和蛋白质代谢状况的影响:对 20 名阻力训练的男性运动员进行了为期 8 周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。参与者每天补充 1 克 UA。对肌肉力量和肌肉耐力进行评估,并收集空腹静脉血样本和晨尿样本,以评估他们的氧化应激水平、炎症指标和蛋白质代谢状况:结果:在 24 小时内进行的两次评估中,在膳食能量摄入和组成方面没有观察到明显差异。补充尿素 8 周后,与基线测量值相比,尿素组的卧推和深蹲的 1RM 均有所增加,但这些变化在统计学上并不显著(Δ = 3.00 ± 0.17 千克,p = 0.051;Δ = 1.35 ± 2.73 千克,p = 0.499)。然而,最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)和失败重复次数(RTF)的表现有明显改善(Δ = 36.10 ± 0.62 NM,p = 0.000;Δ = 2.00 ± 0.56,p = 0.001)。与安慰剂组相比,补充 UA 8 周后,卧推和深蹲的 1RM 均有所提高,但未达到统计学意义(Δ = 3.50 ± 0.79 kg,p = 0.462;Δ = 2.55 ± 1.36 kg,p = 0.710)。此外,与安慰剂组相比,补充 UA 组在 MVIC 和 RTF 方面有显著改善(Δ = 43.50 ± 0.77 NM,p = 0.048;Δ = 2.00 ± 1.22,p = 0.011),这表明与安慰剂组相比,补充 UA 组在这些指标方面表现出更优越的性能。补充尿酸 8 周后,与基线测量值相比,尿酸组的 3-甲基组氨酸(3-MH)显著下降(Δ=-2.38 ± 1.96 μmol/L,p = 0.049)。此外,UA 组的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)与基线相比也有显著增加(Δ= 0.71 ± 0.21 mg/L,p = 0.001)。然而,与基线相比,UA 组的白细胞介素-6(IL-6)(Δ=-1.00 ± 1.01 pg/mL,p = 0.076)和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)(Δ=-0.004 ± 0.72 U/mL,p = 0.996)均无明显变化。与安慰剂组相比,UA 组的 3-MH 没有明显差异(Δ=-3.20 ± 0.31 μmol/L,p = 0.36)。在炎症指标方面,与安慰剂组相比,UA 组的 CRP 显著下降(Δ=-0.79 ± 0.38 mg/L,p = 0.032),而 IL-6 的下降则无统计学意义(Δ=-1.75 ± 0.45 pg/mL,p = 0.215)。此外,与安慰剂组相比,UA 组的 SOD 显著下降(Δ=-4.32 ± 0.90 U/mL,p = 0.041):结论:经过 8 周每天 1 克的 UA 补充后,阻力训练的男性运动员的肌肉力量和耐力都有所提高。此外,补充 UA 还能降低氧化应激水平和炎症反应水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (JISSN) focuses on the acute and chronic effects of sports nutrition and supplementation strategies on body composition, physical performance and metabolism. JISSN is aimed at researchers and sport enthusiasts focused on delivering knowledge on exercise and nutrition on health, disease, rehabilitation, training, and performance. The journal provides a platform on which readers can determine nutritional strategies that may enhance exercise and/or training adaptations leading to improved health and performance.
期刊最新文献
The effects of a sugar-free amino acid-containing electrolyte beverage on 5-kilometer performance, blood electrolytes, and post-exercise cramping versus a conventional carbohydrate-electrolyte sports beverage and water. Gut microbiome composition: link between sports performance and protein absorption? Acute effects of commercial energy drink consumption on exercise performance and cardiovascular safety: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Supplementation of L-glutamine enhanced mucosal immunity and improved hormonal status of combat-sport athletes. The dose-response effects of flurbiprofen, indomethacin, ibuprofen, and naproxen on primary skeletal muscle cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1