Diagnostic accuracy of the point-of-care standard G6PD test™ (SD Biosensor) for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Malaria Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1186/s12936-024-05144-1
Juan Camilo Martínez, Viviana Vélez-Marín, Mary Lopez-Perez, Daniel F Patiño-Lugo, Ivan D Florez
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of the point-of-care standard G6PD test™ (SD Biosensor) for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Juan Camilo Martínez, Viviana Vélez-Marín, Mary Lopez-Perez, Daniel F Patiño-Lugo, Ivan D Florez","doi":"10.1186/s12936-024-05144-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd) is a common genetic enzymopathy that can induce haemolysis triggered by various factors, including some anti-malarial drugs. Although many Point-of-Care (PoC) tests, such as Standard G6PD™ are available to detect G6PDd, its pooled diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To estimate the DTA of StandG6PD-BS at various thresholds of G6PDd, a systematic review with a DTA meta-analysis were conducted, searching EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SciELO databases up to April 4, 2024.The included studies were those that measured G6PD activity using StandG6PD-BS (reference test) and spectrophotometry (gold standard) in patients suspected of having G6PDd. The risk of bias (RoB) of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool and the certainty of evidence (CoE) with the GRADE approach. For the estimation of within-study DTA, a random-effect bivariate meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 30%, 70%, and 80% enzyme levels' thresholds, and a graphical analysis of the heterogeneity using crosshair and Confidence Regions on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 2496 reports, four studies were included with 7864 participants covering all thresholds. Two studies had high RoB in QUADAS-2 domains 2 and 3, and the others had low RoB, with low, moderate, and high heterogeneity at the 30%, 70%, and 80% thresholds, respectively. The pooled sensitivity was 99.1%, 95.7%, and 90% for 30%, 70%, and 80% thresholds, respectively. The pooled specificity was 97.4%; 92.9%; and 89.0% for 30%, 70%, and 80% thresholds, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>StandG6PD-BS is a PoC test with high sensitivity and specificity to detect G6PDd at different thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-05144-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd) is a common genetic enzymopathy that can induce haemolysis triggered by various factors, including some anti-malarial drugs. Although many Point-of-Care (PoC) tests, such as Standard G6PD™ are available to detect G6PDd, its pooled diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) remains unknown.

Methods: To estimate the DTA of StandG6PD-BS at various thresholds of G6PDd, a systematic review with a DTA meta-analysis were conducted, searching EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SciELO databases up to April 4, 2024.The included studies were those that measured G6PD activity using StandG6PD-BS (reference test) and spectrophotometry (gold standard) in patients suspected of having G6PDd. The risk of bias (RoB) of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool and the certainty of evidence (CoE) with the GRADE approach. For the estimation of within-study DTA, a random-effect bivariate meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 30%, 70%, and 80% enzyme levels' thresholds, and a graphical analysis of the heterogeneity using crosshair and Confidence Regions on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space plots.

Results: After screening 2496 reports, four studies were included with 7864 participants covering all thresholds. Two studies had high RoB in QUADAS-2 domains 2 and 3, and the others had low RoB, with low, moderate, and high heterogeneity at the 30%, 70%, and 80% thresholds, respectively. The pooled sensitivity was 99.1%, 95.7%, and 90% for 30%, 70%, and 80% thresholds, respectively. The pooled specificity was 97.4%; 92.9%; and 89.0% for 30%, 70%, and 80% thresholds, respectively.

Conclusion: StandG6PD-BS is a PoC test with high sensitivity and specificity to detect G6PDd at different thresholds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症的床旁标准 G6PD 测试™(SD 生物传感器)的诊断准确性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症(G6PDd)是一种常见的遗传性酶病,可因各种因素(包括某些抗疟疾药物)诱发溶血。尽管有许多护理点(PoC)检验(如标准G6PD™)可用于检测G6PDd,但其集合诊断检测准确性(DTA)仍然未知:为了估算StandG6PD-BS在不同G6PDd阈值下的DTA,我们检索了EMBASE、MEDLINE和SciELO数据库(截至2024年4月4日),进行了系统性综述和DTA荟萃分析,纳入的研究是使用StandG6PD-BS(参考检验)和分光光度法(金标准)测量疑似G6PDd患者G6PD活性的研究。研究的偏倚风险(RoB)采用 QUADAS-2 工具进行评估,证据的确定性(CoE)采用 GRADE 方法进行评估。为了估算研究内部的DTA,我们进行了随机效应双变量荟萃分析,以确定30%、70%和80%酶水平阈值的集合灵敏度和特异性,并使用接收器操作特征(ROC)空间图上的交叉线和置信区对异质性进行了图形分析:在筛选了 2496 份报告后,纳入了四项研究,共有 7864 名参与者,涵盖了所有阈值。两项研究在 QUADAS-2 领域 2 和 3 的 RoB 值较高,其他研究的 RoB 值较低,在 30%、70% 和 80% 的阈值分别存在低、中和高异质性。30%、70% 和 80% 临界值的集合灵敏度分别为 99.1%、95.7% 和 90%。30%、70% 和 80% 临界值的集合特异性分别为 97.4%、92.9% 和 89.0%:结论:StandG6PD-BS 是一种 PoC 检验,在不同阈值下检测 G6PDd 的灵敏度和特异性都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
期刊最新文献
Willingness to pay for a mosquito bite prevention 'forest pack' in Cambodia: results of a discrete choice experiment. Determinants of malaria infection among under five children in Gursum district of Somali region, Eastern Ethiopia. The status of insecticide resistance of Anopheles coluzzii on the islands of São Tomé and Príncipe, after 20 years of malaria vector control. Video-based education messaging to enhance optimal uptake of malaria preventive therapy in pregnant women: a mixed methods study involving pregnant women and midwives in Uganda. Asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections and determinants of carriage in a seasonal malaria chemoprevention setting in Northern Cameroon and south Senegal (Kedougou).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1