Impact of Frailty on COVID-19 Hospitalizations: Results from the California State Inpatient Database.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001754
Muni Rubens, Anshul Saxena, Venkataraghavan Ramamoorthy, Sandeep Appunni, Md Ashfaq Ahmed, Zhenwei Zhang, Yanjia Zhang, Rehan Sha, Samer Fahmy
{"title":"Impact of Frailty on COVID-19 Hospitalizations: Results from the California State Inpatient Database.","authors":"Muni Rubens, Anshul Saxena, Venkataraghavan Ramamoorthy, Sandeep Appunni, Md Ashfaq Ahmed, Zhenwei Zhang, Yanjia Zhang, Rehan Sha, Samer Fahmy","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Frail patients are at greater risk of experiencing adverse clinical outcomes in any critical illness due to decreased physiologic reserves, greater susceptibility to the adverse effects of treatment, and greater needs for intensive care. In this study, we sought to assess the prevalence of frailty and associated adverse in-hospital outcomes among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalizations using the 2020 California State Inpatient Database (SID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data from all COVID-19 hospital patients aged 18 years and older. We identified hospitalizations that were at high risk of frailty using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score. The primary outcome of our study was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were prolonged length of stay, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of frailty was 44.3% among COVID-19 hospitalizations. Using propensity score matching analysis, we found that the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 4.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.28-4.82), prolonged length of stay (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.70-2.90), vasopressor use (OR 8.65, 95% CI 7.45-10.03), mechanical ventilation (OR 6.90, 95% CI 6.47-7.35), and intensive care unit admission (OR 7.17, 95% CI 6.71-7.66) were significantly higher among the group of frail patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show that frailty could be used for assessing and risk stratifying patients for improved hospital outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 11","pages":"646-650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Frail patients are at greater risk of experiencing adverse clinical outcomes in any critical illness due to decreased physiologic reserves, greater susceptibility to the adverse effects of treatment, and greater needs for intensive care. In this study, we sought to assess the prevalence of frailty and associated adverse in-hospital outcomes among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalizations using the 2020 California State Inpatient Database (SID).

Methods: For this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data from all COVID-19 hospital patients aged 18 years and older. We identified hospitalizations that were at high risk of frailty using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score. The primary outcome of our study was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were prolonged length of stay, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admission.

Results: The prevalence of frailty was 44.3% among COVID-19 hospitalizations. Using propensity score matching analysis, we found that the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 4.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.28-4.82), prolonged length of stay (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.70-2.90), vasopressor use (OR 8.65, 95% CI 7.45-10.03), mechanical ventilation (OR 6.90, 95% CI 6.47-7.35), and intensive care unit admission (OR 7.17, 95% CI 6.71-7.66) were significantly higher among the group of frail patients.

Conclusion: Our findings show that frailty could be used for assessing and risk stratifying patients for improved hospital outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体弱对 COVID-19 住院治疗的影响:加利福尼亚州住院病人数据库的结果。
目的:由于生理储备下降、更容易受到治疗的不良影响以及更需要重症监护,体弱患者在任何危重疾病中出现不良临床结果的风险都更大。在这项研究中,我们试图利用 2020 年加利福尼亚州住院病人数据库(SID)评估 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院病人中体弱的患病率和相关的院内不良预后:在这项研究中,我们对所有 18 岁及以上的 COVID-19 住院患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。我们使用医院虚弱风险评分(Hospital Frailty Risk Score)确定了虚弱高风险住院患者。研究的主要结果是院内死亡率,次要结果是住院时间延长、使用血管加压素、机械通气和入住重症监护室:结果:在 COVID-19 住院患者中,体弱患病率为 44.3%。通过倾向得分匹配分析,我们发现死亡率(几率比 [OR] 4.54,95% 置信区间 [CI] 4.28-4.82)、住院时间延长(OR 2.81,95% CI 2.70-2.90)、使用血管加压器(OR 8.65,95% CI 7.45-10.03)、机械通气(OR 6.90,95% CI 6.47-7.35)和入住重症监护室(OR 7.17,95% CI 6.71-7.66)在体弱患者组中明显较高:我们的研究结果表明,体弱可用于对患者进行评估和风险分层,以改善住院效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Cohort Study of Lt. Col. Luke J. Weathers VA Medical Center Patients with Positive FIT and Incomplete GI Evaluation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advancement of a Vertically Integrated Training Program (VITP): Introspective Assessment and Expansion. Clinical Shift Distribution in Academic Hospital Medicine Fellowship across 10 Years. Effect of HIV Status and Charlson Comorbidity Index on COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes in a Case-Control Study. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Cirrhosis and Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1