Impact of non-invasive ventilation on microbial colonisation patterns in preterm infants: a single-centre study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMJ Paediatrics Open Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002783
Feixiang Luo, Wei Shi, Xiaoyan Fan, Mingming Zhou, Fei Shen, Haihong Zhu, Jihua Zhu, Zheng Chen
{"title":"Impact of non-invasive ventilation on microbial colonisation patterns in preterm infants: a single-centre study.","authors":"Feixiang Luo, Wei Shi, Xiaoyan Fan, Mingming Zhou, Fei Shen, Haihong Zhu, Jihua Zhu, Zheng Chen","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and the colonisation of oral and nasal microbiota in preterm infants within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The NICU of Zhejiang University Children's Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients include preterm infants with a gestational age of 28-35 weeks, enrolled within the first 24 hours of life.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Infants were categorised based on respiratory support: NIV, which included nasal continuous positive airway pressure, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula; and no respiratory support, defined as room air or low-flow nasal cannula at ≤2 L/min.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the colonisation of oral and nasal microbiota at 5 days post birth, measured by colony-forming units per millilitre (CFU/mL), with colonisation defined as bacterial growth >10<sup>3</sup> CFU/mL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 100 preterm infants, with 50 in each group. Nasal microbial colonisation was observed in 56% (28/50) of the NIV group, significantly higher than the 28% in the no respiratory support group. No significant differences were found in oral colonisation. Adjusted binary logistic regression showed an association between NIV and increased risk of nasal colonisation (adjusted OR=2.91, 95% CI 1.12 to 7.58, p=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NIV in preterm infants was linked to a higher risk of nasal microbial colonisation. This finding suggests the need for further research and consideration of infection control strategies in the NICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and the colonisation of oral and nasal microbiota in preterm infants within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Design: A prospective cohort study.

Setting: The NICU of Zhejiang University Children's Hospital.

Patients: Patients include preterm infants with a gestational age of 28-35 weeks, enrolled within the first 24 hours of life.

Interventions: Infants were categorised based on respiratory support: NIV, which included nasal continuous positive airway pressure, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula; and no respiratory support, defined as room air or low-flow nasal cannula at ≤2 L/min.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the colonisation of oral and nasal microbiota at 5 days post birth, measured by colony-forming units per millilitre (CFU/mL), with colonisation defined as bacterial growth >103 CFU/mL.

Results: The study included 100 preterm infants, with 50 in each group. Nasal microbial colonisation was observed in 56% (28/50) of the NIV group, significantly higher than the 28% in the no respiratory support group. No significant differences were found in oral colonisation. Adjusted binary logistic regression showed an association between NIV and increased risk of nasal colonisation (adjusted OR=2.91, 95% CI 1.12 to 7.58, p=0.028).

Conclusions: NIV in preterm infants was linked to a higher risk of nasal microbial colonisation. This finding suggests the need for further research and consideration of infection control strategies in the NICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创通气对早产儿微生物定植模式的影响:一项单中心研究。
研究目的本研究旨在评估无创通气(NIV)与新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)早产儿口腔和鼻腔微生物群定植之间的关系:前瞻性队列研究:背景:浙江大学附属儿童医院新生儿重症监护室:患者:胎龄在28-35周的早产儿,出生后24小时内入院:根据呼吸支持对婴儿进行分类:NIV包括鼻腔持续气道正压通气、鼻腔间歇正压通气或高流量鼻插管;无呼吸支持指室内空气或低流量鼻插管,≤2 L/min:主要结果:主要结果是出生后5天口腔和鼻腔微生物群的定植情况,以每毫升菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)衡量,定植定义为细菌生长>103 CFU/mL:研究包括 100 名早产儿,每组 50 名。在 NIV 组中,56%(28/50)的婴儿出现鼻腔微生物定植,明显高于无呼吸支持组的 28%。在口腔定植方面没有发现明显差异。调整后的二元逻辑回归显示,NIV与鼻腔定植风险增加之间存在关联(调整后OR=2.91,95% CI 1.12至7.58,p=0.028):早产儿的 NIV 与较高的鼻腔微生物定植风险有关。这一发现表明,有必要在新生儿重症监护室开展进一步研究并考虑感染控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Lesson in understanding parents' perspective: perception of quality of care and COVID-19-related fears among users of paediatric health services over the COVID-19 pandemic in 11 facilities in Italy. Hearing impairment following surgically repaired congenital heart disease in children: a prospective study. Anxiety and care experiences in adolescents with chronic health conditions: an international, longitudinal study across the transfer of care. Ophthalmological changes in children with advanced stage of chronic kidney disease: a hospital-based study. Mental healthcare in paediatric epilepsy clinics: implementation by non-mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1