Using Overlap Weights to Address Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Restricted Mean Counterfactual Survival Times.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae416
Zhiqiang Cao, Lama Ghazi, Claudia Mastrogiacomo, Laura Forastiere, F Perry Wilson, Fan Li
{"title":"Using Overlap Weights to Address Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Restricted Mean Counterfactual Survival Times.","authors":"Zhiqiang Cao, Lama Ghazi, Claudia Mastrogiacomo, Laura Forastiere, F Perry Wilson, Fan Li","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) is a commonly used approach for treatment comparisons in observational data, the resulting estimates may be subject to bias and excessively large variance under lack of overlap. By smoothly down-weighting units with extreme propensity scores, i.e., those that are close (or equal) to zero or one, overlap weighting (OW) can help mitigate the bias and variance issues associated with IPTW. Although theoretical and simulation results have supported the use of OW with continuous and binary outcomes, its performance with survival outcomes remains to be further investigated, especially when the target estimand is defined based on the restricted mean survival time (RMST). We combine propensity score weighting and inverse probability of censoring weighting to estimate the restricted mean counterfactual survival times, and provide computationally-efficient variance estimators when the propensity scores are estimated by logistic regression and the censoring process is estimated by Cox regression. We conduct simulations to compare the performance of weighting methods in terms of bias, variance, and 95% interval coverage, under various degrees of overlap. Under moderate and weak overlap, we demonstrate the advantage of OW over IPTW, trimming and truncation, with respect to bias, variance, and coverage when estimating RMST.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) is a commonly used approach for treatment comparisons in observational data, the resulting estimates may be subject to bias and excessively large variance under lack of overlap. By smoothly down-weighting units with extreme propensity scores, i.e., those that are close (or equal) to zero or one, overlap weighting (OW) can help mitigate the bias and variance issues associated with IPTW. Although theoretical and simulation results have supported the use of OW with continuous and binary outcomes, its performance with survival outcomes remains to be further investigated, especially when the target estimand is defined based on the restricted mean survival time (RMST). We combine propensity score weighting and inverse probability of censoring weighting to estimate the restricted mean counterfactual survival times, and provide computationally-efficient variance estimators when the propensity scores are estimated by logistic regression and the censoring process is estimated by Cox regression. We conduct simulations to compare the performance of weighting methods in terms of bias, variance, and 95% interval coverage, under various degrees of overlap. Under moderate and weak overlap, we demonstrate the advantage of OW over IPTW, trimming and truncation, with respect to bias, variance, and coverage when estimating RMST.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在估算受限平均反事实生存时间时使用重叠权重解决极端倾向得分问题。
虽然反向治疗概率加权(IPTW)是观察数据中治疗比较的常用方法,但在缺乏重叠的情况下,由此得出的估计值可能会出现偏差和过大的方差。重叠加权(OW)通过对具有极端倾向得分(即接近(或等于)0 或 1 的单位)的单位进行平滑降权,可以帮助减轻与 IPTW 相关的偏差和方差问题。虽然理论和模拟结果支持在连续和二元结果中使用重叠加权,但其在生存结果中的表现仍有待进一步研究,尤其是当目标估计值是基于受限平均生存时间(RMST)定义时。我们结合了倾向得分加权和剔除反概率加权来估算受限平均反事实生存时间,并在倾向得分由逻辑回归估算、剔除过程由 Cox 回归估算时提供了计算效率高的方差估算器。我们进行了模拟,比较了加权方法在不同重叠程度下的偏差、方差和 95% 区间覆盖率方面的性能。在中度和弱度重叠情况下,我们证明了在估计 RMST 时,OW 在偏差、方差和覆盖率方面优于 IPTW、修剪和截断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
All-Cause Mortality and 1990-1991 Gulf War Service within the Millennium Cohort Study (2001-2021). Using Double Negative Controls to Adjust for Healthy User Bias in a Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Safety Study. Modern Sources of Controls in Case-Control Studies. Editorial consultants 1. Characterizing state-level structural cisheterosexism trajectories using sequence and cluster analysis, 1996-2016, 50 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., and associations with health status and healthcare outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1