Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for Analysis of 58 Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluid and Method Comparison with an Established LC-HRMS Method.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of analytical toxicology Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1093/jat/bkae087
Yufang Zheng, Magnus Axelsson, Moa Andresen Bergström
{"title":"Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for Analysis of 58 Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluid and Method Comparison with an Established LC-HRMS Method.","authors":"Yufang Zheng, Magnus Axelsson, Moa Andresen Bergström","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods for detection of multiple drugs of abuse (DoA) in oral fluid (OF) samples are being implemented in many clinical routine laboratories. Therefore, there is a need to develop new multi-analyte methods with simple sample pre-treatment and short analysis times. The purpose of this work was to validate a method detecting 58 DoA to be used with two different OF sampling kits, the saliva collection system (SCS) from Greiner Bio-One and Quantisal from Immunalysis, using the same sample pretreatment and analytical method. A set of 110 samples collected with the SCS kit was further compared to an LC-HRMS (high resolution mass spectrometry) method in another laboratory. The method was successfully validated, with precision and accuracy of ≤15% and z-scores of <2 for external controls. Using a sensitive LC-MS/MS instrument, the detection limits were <1 µg/L in neat oral fluid. In the comparative study between the LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS methods using SCS samples, a good agreement was observed. Discrepancies were limited to lower concentration ranges, attributable to differences in cut-off thresholds between the methods. This work contributes to the development of LC-MS multi-analyte methods for OF samples, which are suitable for clinical routine laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods for detection of multiple drugs of abuse (DoA) in oral fluid (OF) samples are being implemented in many clinical routine laboratories. Therefore, there is a need to develop new multi-analyte methods with simple sample pre-treatment and short analysis times. The purpose of this work was to validate a method detecting 58 DoA to be used with two different OF sampling kits, the saliva collection system (SCS) from Greiner Bio-One and Quantisal from Immunalysis, using the same sample pretreatment and analytical method. A set of 110 samples collected with the SCS kit was further compared to an LC-HRMS (high resolution mass spectrometry) method in another laboratory. The method was successfully validated, with precision and accuracy of ≤15% and z-scores of <2 for external controls. Using a sensitive LC-MS/MS instrument, the detection limits were <1 µg/L in neat oral fluid. In the comparative study between the LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS methods using SCS samples, a good agreement was observed. Discrepancies were limited to lower concentration ranges, attributable to differences in cut-off thresholds between the methods. This work contributes to the development of LC-MS multi-analyte methods for OF samples, which are suitable for clinical routine laboratories.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于分析口服液中 58 种滥用药物的 LC-MS/MS 方法的验证以及与已确立的 LC-HRMS 方法的比较。
许多临床常规实验室正在采用液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)方法检测口腔液(OF)样本中的多种滥用药物(DoA)。因此,有必要开发样品预处理简单、分析时间短的新型多分析方法。这项工作的目的是验证一种可检测 58 种 DoA 的方法,该方法可用于两种不同的口腔液采样试剂盒,即 Greiner Bio-One 公司的唾液采集系统(SCS)和 Immunalysis 公司的 Quantisal,使用相同的样品预处理和分析方法。使用 SCS 套件采集的一组 110 份样本与另一个实验室的 LC-HRMS(高分辨质谱法)方法进行了进一步比较。该方法成功通过验证,精确度和准确度≤15%,z-分数为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Post-mortem distribution of MDPHP in a fatal intoxication case. Trends in Central/Peripheral Ratio of Fentanyl in Harris County, TX and Orange County, CA from 2009-2020. LC-MS/MS confirmation of 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8, Δ9, Δ1°) and hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) metabolites in authentic urine specimens. NSC-ADID Position Statement on Performance Impairment in Safety-Sensitive Positions Related to Cannabis and Other Cannabinoids. Optimization of a disposable pipette tips extraction (DPX) for the analysis of psychoactive substances in sweat specimens using Design of Experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1