Psychometric properties of an online psychotherapy advantages and disadvantages instrument: Preliminary results of a multi-center pilot study

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104566
J.M. Santos , M.P.A. Fleck , S.P. Teche , I.C. Passos , M.H. Costa , N.S. Rocha
{"title":"Psychometric properties of an online psychotherapy advantages and disadvantages instrument: Preliminary results of a multi-center pilot study","authors":"J.M. Santos ,&nbsp;M.P.A. Fleck ,&nbsp;S.P. Teche ,&nbsp;I.C. Passos ,&nbsp;M.H. Costa ,&nbsp;N.S. Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We verified the need for instruments that could assess the perceptions of patients, therapists, and psychotherapy supervisors about online Psychotherapy. Objectives: to Build a scale of advantages and disadvantages of online psychotherapy. Method: A pilot cross-sectional multicenter sample collected from 2020 to 2021 of 129 patients, 20 therapists, and 35 supervisors. We used several analyses. The final scale contained 22 items divided into two domains: advantages and disadvantages. Results: Cronbach's alpha showed good internal consistency (0.88 and 0.85). The scale showed discriminative ability. Convergent validity showed significant correlations between WAI-SR domains (p 〈0,001). The scale showed a good data fit in the confirmatory factor analysis (X<sup>2</sup> = 255,859; DF = 197; <em>p</em> = .003; CFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.047; GFI = 0.84 TLI = 0.94). Conclusion: This pilot study showed that the instrument proved preliminary good psychometric properties but needs to be evaluated in a larger sample.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 104566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169182400444X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We verified the need for instruments that could assess the perceptions of patients, therapists, and psychotherapy supervisors about online Psychotherapy. Objectives: to Build a scale of advantages and disadvantages of online psychotherapy. Method: A pilot cross-sectional multicenter sample collected from 2020 to 2021 of 129 patients, 20 therapists, and 35 supervisors. We used several analyses. The final scale contained 22 items divided into two domains: advantages and disadvantages. Results: Cronbach's alpha showed good internal consistency (0.88 and 0.85). The scale showed discriminative ability. Convergent validity showed significant correlations between WAI-SR domains (p 〈0,001). The scale showed a good data fit in the confirmatory factor analysis (X2 = 255,859; DF = 197; p = .003; CFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.047; GFI = 0.84 TLI = 0.94). Conclusion: This pilot study showed that the instrument proved preliminary good psychometric properties but needs to be evaluated in a larger sample.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线心理治疗利弊工具的心理计量特性:多中心试点研究的初步结果。
我们验证了对可评估患者、治疗师和心理治疗督导对在线心理治疗看法的工具的需求。目标:建立在线心理治疗利弊量表:从 2020 年到 2021 年,我们对 129 名患者、20 名治疗师和 35 名督导进行了试点横断面多中心抽样调查。我们采用了多种分析方法。最终量表包含 22 个项目,分为两个领域:优势和劣势:Cronbach's alpha 显示了良好的内部一致性(0.88 和 0.85)。该量表具有区分能力。收敛效度显示 WAI-SR 各领域之间存在显著相关(p 〈0,001)。量表在确认性因素分析中显示出良好的数据拟合(X2 = 255,859; DF = 197; p = .003; CFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.047; GFI = 0.84 TLI = 0.94):这项试点研究表明,该工具具有初步的良好心理测量特性,但还需要在更大的样本中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative insights into the experiences of French parents of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD): Child-related challenges and family implications Effects of emotional culture of joy on employee happiness: A moderated-mediation model in hospitality Exploring gender differences in the relations between passion, grit, growth mindset, compassion and success: an explorative study Effects of 8-weeks acupuncture on eyes-closed resting state natural EEG frequency components in endometriosis: AcuENDO trial sub-study Exploring the evolving relationship between children and youth obesity and depression: A bibliometric analysis (1976–2025)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1