Assessing radioactivity levels in agricultural soil: a comparative study of traditional vs. modern fertilization techniques in Tunisian oases

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1007/s10661-024-13271-0
Sofiene Tayar, Borhan Tellili, Chedly Souga, Youssef Elmahroug
{"title":"Assessing radioactivity levels in agricultural soil: a comparative study of traditional vs. modern fertilization techniques in Tunisian oases","authors":"Sofiene Tayar,&nbsp;Borhan Tellili,&nbsp;Chedly Souga,&nbsp;Youssef Elmahroug","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13271-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To establish a radiological national reference for agricultural soil across Tunisian oases and assess the risk to human health associated with date consumption, with a focus on comparing the impact of traditional and modern fertilization, radiological parameters and activity levels of <sup>22</sup>⁶Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>4</sup>⁰K were determined for 27 oases. These oases were located in three southern Tunisian governorates. The activity concentration of <sup>22</sup>⁶Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>4</sup>⁰K was measured using a 3 × 3 inch NaI(Tl) scintillation detector, which was found to be 21.82 ± 1.0 <span>\\({\\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\\)</span>, 26.51 ± 1.1 <span>\\({\\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\\)</span>, and 559.21 ± 23.0 <span>\\({\\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\\)</span>, respectively, for traditional oases and 26.56 ± 1.2 <span>\\({\\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\\)</span>, 24.45 ± 1.1 <span>\\({\\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\\)</span>, and 661.28 ± 26.3 <span>\\({\\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\\)</span>, respectively, for modern oases. In addition, ambient dose equivalent rate was measured during sampling using a multipurpose hand-held radiation CsI(Tl) detector, which was found to be 0.075 µSv/h in traditional oases and 0.078 µSv/h in modern oases. The resulting radiological parameters and activity concentrations were then compared to results from neighboring countries and the average soil activity worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"196 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13271-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To establish a radiological national reference for agricultural soil across Tunisian oases and assess the risk to human health associated with date consumption, with a focus on comparing the impact of traditional and modern fertilization, radiological parameters and activity levels of 22⁶Ra, 232Th, and 4⁰K were determined for 27 oases. These oases were located in three southern Tunisian governorates. The activity concentration of 22⁶Ra, 232Th, and 4⁰K was measured using a 3 × 3 inch NaI(Tl) scintillation detector, which was found to be 21.82 ± 1.0 \({\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\), 26.51 ± 1.1 \({\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\), and 559.21 ± 23.0 \({\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\), respectively, for traditional oases and 26.56 ± 1.2 \({\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\), 24.45 ± 1.1 \({\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\), and 661.28 ± 26.3 \({\text{Bq kg}}^{-1}\), respectively, for modern oases. In addition, ambient dose equivalent rate was measured during sampling using a multipurpose hand-held radiation CsI(Tl) detector, which was found to be 0.075 µSv/h in traditional oases and 0.078 µSv/h in modern oases. The resulting radiological parameters and activity concentrations were then compared to results from neighboring countries and the average soil activity worldwide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估农业土壤中的放射性水平:突尼斯绿洲传统与现代施肥技术比较研究。
为了建立突尼斯各绿洲农业土壤的放射性国家参考标准,并评估食用椰枣对人类健康造成的风险,重点比较传统施肥和现代施肥的影响,对 27 个绿洲的 22⁶Ra、232Th 和 4⁰K 放射性参数和放射性活度水平进行了测定。这些绿洲位于突尼斯南部的三个省。使用 3 × 3 英寸 NaI(Tl)闪烁探测器测量了 22⁶Ra、232Th 和 4⁰K 的放射性活度浓度,发现它们分别为 21.82 ± 1.0 Bq kg - 1、26.51 ± 1.1 Bq kg - 1 和 559.在传统绿洲,这一数值分别为 21.82 ± 1.0 Bq kg - 1、26.51 ± 1.1 Bq kg - 1 和 559.00 ± 23.0 Bq kg - 1;在现代绿洲,这一数值分别为 26.56 ± 1.2 Bq kg - 1、24.45 ± 1.1 Bq kg - 1 和 661.28 ± 26.3 Bq kg - 1。此外,在采样过程中还使用多用途手持式铯(Tl)辐射探测器测量了环境剂量当量率,发现传统绿洲的环境剂量当量率为 0.075 µSv/h,现代绿洲的环境剂量当量率为 0.078 µSv/h。随后,将得出的辐射参数和放射性浓度与邻国的结果和全球平均土壤放射性进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal(loid)s pollution in soils of a typical agricultural and rural area: Source apportionment and derived risk quantification Spatial distribution patterns and hotspots of extreme agro-climatic resources in the Horro Guduru Wollega Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia Health risks and pathological effects of heavy metals in Oreochromis mossambicus from Usuma River, Nigeria Comprehensive assessment of fish diversity and water health in river Indus, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Enhanced removal of methyl orange and malachite green using mesoporous TO@CTAB nanocomposite: Synthesis, characterization, optimization and real wastewater treatment efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1