Physical Activity Variability in Patellofemoral Pain: Relationships With Clinical and Psychological Outcomes.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.008
Sungwan Kim, Neal R Glaviano
{"title":"Physical Activity Variability in Patellofemoral Pain: Relationships With Clinical and Psychological Outcomes.","authors":"Sungwan Kim, Neal R Glaviano","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To (1) compare physical activity variability between individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and pain-free individuals and (2) evaluate the relationships of physical activity variability with pain severity, symptom duration, disability, and pain catastrophizing in PFP cohorts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University research laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals with PFP (N=34) and pain-free individuals (N=34) aged 18 to 40 years.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>We assessed physical activity (daily steps and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]) over a period of 14 consecutive days using a triaxial accelerometer. Variability (coefficient of variation) for daily steps and MVPA was calculated, where higher coefficient of variation values indicate greater physical activity variability. We evaluated pain severity (numeric pain rating scale), symptom duration (months), disability (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Patellofemoral subscale), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale). Independent t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests evaluated group differences in physical activity variability. Spearman ρ correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationships of physical activity variability with pain severity, symptom duration, disability, and pain catastrophizing in PFP cohorts. Correlation coefficients were interpreted as weak (<0.40), moderate (0.40-0.70), and strong (>0.70).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, height, and mass did not differ between individuals with PFP and pain-free individuals (P>.05). Individuals with PFP displayed greater variability in daily steps (P<.001) and MVPA (P=.001) compared to pain-free individuals. In individuals with PFP, greater variability in daily steps was moderately related to higher pain severity (ρ=0.41, P=.016), while greater variability in MVPA was weakly related to higher pain severity (ρ=0.36, P=.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with PFP demonstrated greater variability in physical activity compared to pain-free individuals, which positively related to more severe pain. Future PFP research should explore the underlying factors contributing to increased physical activity variability and their potential implications for pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To (1) compare physical activity variability between individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and pain-free individuals and (2) evaluate the relationships of physical activity variability with pain severity, symptom duration, disability, and pain catastrophizing in PFP cohorts.

Design: Cross-sectional case-control study.

Setting: University research laboratory.

Participants: Individuals with PFP (N=34) and pain-free individuals (N=34) aged 18 to 40 years.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: We assessed physical activity (daily steps and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]) over a period of 14 consecutive days using a triaxial accelerometer. Variability (coefficient of variation) for daily steps and MVPA was calculated, where higher coefficient of variation values indicate greater physical activity variability. We evaluated pain severity (numeric pain rating scale), symptom duration (months), disability (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Patellofemoral subscale), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale). Independent t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests evaluated group differences in physical activity variability. Spearman ρ correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationships of physical activity variability with pain severity, symptom duration, disability, and pain catastrophizing in PFP cohorts. Correlation coefficients were interpreted as weak (<0.40), moderate (0.40-0.70), and strong (>0.70).

Results: Age, height, and mass did not differ between individuals with PFP and pain-free individuals (P>.05). Individuals with PFP displayed greater variability in daily steps (P<.001) and MVPA (P=.001) compared to pain-free individuals. In individuals with PFP, greater variability in daily steps was moderately related to higher pain severity (ρ=0.41, P=.016), while greater variability in MVPA was weakly related to higher pain severity (ρ=0.36, P=.037).

Conclusions: Individuals with PFP demonstrated greater variability in physical activity compared to pain-free individuals, which positively related to more severe pain. Future PFP research should explore the underlying factors contributing to increased physical activity variability and their potential implications for pain management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髌骨股骨痛的体力活动可变性:与临床和心理结果的关系
目的目的:(1)比较髌骨股骨痛(PFP)患者和无痛患者的体力活动变异性;(2)评估PFP队列中体力活动变异性与疼痛严重程度、症状持续时间、残疾和疼痛灾难化的关系:设计:横断面病例对照研究:地点:大学研究实验室:干预措施:不适用:主要结果测量我们使用三轴加速度计对连续 14 天的体力活动(每日步数和中高强度体力活动 [MVPA])进行了评估。我们计算了每日步数和 MVPA 的变异性(变异系数),CV 值越高,表明体力活动的变异性越大。我们评估了疼痛的严重程度(数字疼痛评分量表)、症状持续时间(月)、残疾程度(膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分-髌股关节分量表)和疼痛灾难化程度(疼痛灾难化量表)。独立 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估了体力活动变异性的组间差异。计算斯皮尔曼 ρ 相关系数以确定体力活动变异性与 PFP 组群中疼痛严重程度、症状持续时间、残疾和疼痛灾难化之间的关系。相关系数被解释为弱(0.70):结果表明:PFP 患者与无痛患者在年龄、身高和体重方面没有差异(P>.05)。PFP患者的每日步数变异性更大(PC结论:PFP患者的每日步数变异性更大(P>.05):与无痛患者相比,PFP 患者的体力活动变异性更大,这与更严重的疼痛呈正相关。未来的 PFP 研究可能会探索导致体力活动变异性增加的潜在因素及其对疼痛管理的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Increased stiffness is evidenced in the deep but not superficial lumbar multifidus muscle in professional athletes with chronic low back pain. Effectiveness of a community-based exercise program for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness of micro-electrolysis associated with exercises versus exercises alone on pain intensity and disability in individuals with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: A randomized clinical trial. Longitudinal goal attainment with repeat injections of abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with lower limb spasticity: Results from a prospective observational study. Test-retest reliability and agreement of the work ability index - single item in persons with physical disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1