A Qualitative Service Evaluation of the Introduction of Single Session Therapy for Families in a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service in England, United Kingdom.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1111/jep.14222
Kiran Flynn, Kirsty Stimpson, Solomon Brown, Sarah De Silvo, Jan Parker
{"title":"A Qualitative Service Evaluation of the Introduction of Single Session Therapy for Families in a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service in England, United Kingdom.","authors":"Kiran Flynn, Kirsty Stimpson, Solomon Brown, Sarah De Silvo, Jan Parker","doi":"10.1111/jep.14222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>This service evaluation details the process of introducing Single Session Therapy (SST) with families to a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service in the United Kingdom. SST is a model of short-term psychotherapy intervention which can be applied to family contexts to provide timely mental health support.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This service evaluation had two objectives: (1) Review the existing evidence base and literature for SST. (2) Evaluate the implementation of a new SST treatment pathway in CAMHS, including patient experiences and satisfaction with the service.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>SQUIRE Guidelines are used to report on this new knowledge of healthcare. This evaluation used qualitative methods to evaluate the impact of the new service. The team also used existing frameworks within the Trust, namely discharge data, which is collected routinely as part of service evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This evaluation suggests positive support for this model, and that many families appreciate and value the opportunity to build on strengths and work toward their goals as families. This project outcome appears to support some of Talmon's (1990) findings that the most commonly attended number of sessions is one, and that of those who attended only one session, many perceived the session as useful. Waiting times for our service are extremely long. The pace and structure around goals and solutions could feel both galvanising, as some reported, but others felt it was an insufficient response to the severity of their difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More high-quality research is needed before judgments can be made around the cost-effectiveness or efficacy of SST over existing approaches in the United Kingdom. While implementing SST should not be used to justify reduction in existing interventions, it offers a positive additional service for young people experiencing mental health difficulties and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: This service evaluation details the process of introducing Single Session Therapy (SST) with families to a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service in the United Kingdom. SST is a model of short-term psychotherapy intervention which can be applied to family contexts to provide timely mental health support.

Aims and objectives: This service evaluation had two objectives: (1) Review the existing evidence base and literature for SST. (2) Evaluate the implementation of a new SST treatment pathway in CAMHS, including patient experiences and satisfaction with the service.

Method: SQUIRE Guidelines are used to report on this new knowledge of healthcare. This evaluation used qualitative methods to evaluate the impact of the new service. The team also used existing frameworks within the Trust, namely discharge data, which is collected routinely as part of service evaluation.

Results: This evaluation suggests positive support for this model, and that many families appreciate and value the opportunity to build on strengths and work toward their goals as families. This project outcome appears to support some of Talmon's (1990) findings that the most commonly attended number of sessions is one, and that of those who attended only one session, many perceived the session as useful. Waiting times for our service are extremely long. The pace and structure around goals and solutions could feel both galvanising, as some reported, but others felt it was an insufficient response to the severity of their difficulties.

Conclusion: More high-quality research is needed before judgments can be made around the cost-effectiveness or efficacy of SST over existing approaches in the United Kingdom. While implementing SST should not be used to justify reduction in existing interventions, it offers a positive additional service for young people experiencing mental health difficulties and their families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国英格兰一家儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构引入单次家庭治疗的定性服务评估。
理由:这项服务评估详细说明了英国一家儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构在家庭中引入单次治疗(SST)的过程。SST 是一种短期心理治疗干预模式,可应用于家庭环境,及时提供心理健康支持:这项服务评估有两个目标:(1) 回顾 SST 的现有证据基础和文献。(2) 评估新的 SST 治疗路径在 CAMHS 中的实施情况,包括患者的体验和对服务的满意度:方法:采用 SQUIRE 准则来报告医疗保健方面的新知识。本次评估采用定性方法来评估新服务的影响。评估小组还使用了信托基金内的现有框架,即出院数据,该数据作为服务评估的一部分被例行收集:评估结果表明,这种模式得到了积极的支持,许多家庭赞赏并珍惜这种机会,以家庭为单位,发挥优势,努力实现自己的目标。这一项目结果似乎支持了 Talmon(1990 年)的一些研究结果,即最常参加的疗程次数是一次,而且在只参加一次疗程的人中,许多人认为该疗程是有用的。我们的服务等待时间非常长。正如一些人所报告的那样,围绕目标和解决方案的节奏和结构可能会让人感到振奋,但其他人则认为这不足以应对他们所面临的严重困难:在判断 SST 与英国现有方法相比的成本效益或有效性之前,需要进行更多高质量的研究。虽然实施 SST 不应用来证明减少现有干预措施是合理的,但它为有心理健康问题的青少年及其家庭提供了一项积极的额外服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
AttributeRank: An Algorithm for Attribute Ranking in Clinical Variable Selection The 6-Item Self-Efficacy Scale in Chronic Disease Management in Women With Endometriosis: A Turkish Validity and Reliability Study Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale for the Italian Paediatric Population Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Content Validation of the Yonsei Lifestyle Profile for Older Adults in the United States Effect of Excess Mortality on Longevity During the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1