Quantitative evaluation of adalimumab and anti-adalimumab antibodies in sera using a surface plasmon resonance biosensor

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110838
Andrea Di Santo , Matteo Accinno , Fosca Errante , Manuela Capone , Alessandra Vultaggio , Eleonora Simoncini , Giuditta Zipoli , Lorenzo Cosmi , Francesco Annunziato , Paolo Rovero , Feliciana Real Fernandez
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of adalimumab and anti-adalimumab antibodies in sera using a surface plasmon resonance biosensor","authors":"Andrea Di Santo ,&nbsp;Matteo Accinno ,&nbsp;Fosca Errante ,&nbsp;Manuela Capone ,&nbsp;Alessandra Vultaggio ,&nbsp;Eleonora Simoncini ,&nbsp;Giuditta Zipoli ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Cosmi ,&nbsp;Francesco Annunziato ,&nbsp;Paolo Rovero ,&nbsp;Feliciana Real Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Monitoring of therapeutic antibody adalimumab (ADL) and of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) in autoimmune diseases patients' sera has achieved increased attention since several studies showed a correlation between AAA levels and treatment failure. We evaluated a new surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based method that, with slight changes in the analysis condition and in the ligand immobilized on the chip surface, allows to monitor both AAA and ADL. This new label-free method does not require sample pretreatments, and it is fully automated, only requiring the preparation of the chip, which can be used for multiple analysis, and the preparation of the sample sets.</div></div><div><h3>Design &amp; Methods</h3><div>Sera from ADL-treated patients (n = 47) and controls (n = 13) were included in this study. Quantitative analysis of AAA and ADL were performed separately using a new SPR-biosensor, and a commercially available ELISA kit. Agreement was defined by overall, positive, and negative agreement. Wilson Score was used to calculate confidence intervals (CI) on binomial probability and Spearman’s rho and Bland-Altman test were used to assess correlations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ELISA and SPR-based assay were able to identify circulating AAA in ADL-treated patients, with the percentage of positivity varying among the methods, with an overall agreement of 79%. AAA were detected in 18 (38 %) out of the 47 treated patients by the ELISA whereas SPR-based assay detected 10 (21 %) out of 47 samples.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Real-time label free SPR-based protocol for both AAA and ADL quantification has been set-up. Although quantitative differences were observed when compared with ELISA, the agreement among methodologies was high, particularly for ADL quantification within the therapeutic window of the drug.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 110838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024001322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Monitoring of therapeutic antibody adalimumab (ADL) and of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) in autoimmune diseases patients' sera has achieved increased attention since several studies showed a correlation between AAA levels and treatment failure. We evaluated a new surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based method that, with slight changes in the analysis condition and in the ligand immobilized on the chip surface, allows to monitor both AAA and ADL. This new label-free method does not require sample pretreatments, and it is fully automated, only requiring the preparation of the chip, which can be used for multiple analysis, and the preparation of the sample sets.

Design & Methods

Sera from ADL-treated patients (n = 47) and controls (n = 13) were included in this study. Quantitative analysis of AAA and ADL were performed separately using a new SPR-biosensor, and a commercially available ELISA kit. Agreement was defined by overall, positive, and negative agreement. Wilson Score was used to calculate confidence intervals (CI) on binomial probability and Spearman’s rho and Bland-Altman test were used to assess correlations.

Results

ELISA and SPR-based assay were able to identify circulating AAA in ADL-treated patients, with the percentage of positivity varying among the methods, with an overall agreement of 79%. AAA were detected in 18 (38 %) out of the 47 treated patients by the ELISA whereas SPR-based assay detected 10 (21 %) out of 47 samples.

Conclusions

Real-time label free SPR-based protocol for both AAA and ADL quantification has been set-up. Although quantitative differences were observed when compared with ELISA, the agreement among methodologies was high, particularly for ADL quantification within the therapeutic window of the drug.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用表面等离子体共振生物传感器定量评估血清中的阿达木单抗和抗阿达木单抗抗体
目的:自从几项研究表明阿达木单抗抗体水平与治疗失败之间存在相关性以来,对自身免疫性疾病患者血清中的治疗抗体阿达木单抗(ADL)和抗阿达木单抗抗体(AAA)进行监测就受到了越来越多的关注。我们评估了一种基于表面等离子体共振(SPR)的新方法,只要稍微改变分析条件和固定在芯片表面的配体,就能同时监测 AAA 和 ADL。这种新的无标记方法不需要对样品进行预处理,而且是全自动的,只需要准备芯片(可用于多次分析)和准备样品集:本研究纳入了ADL治疗患者(47人)和对照组(13人)的血清。使用新型 SPR 生物传感器和市售 ELISA 试剂盒分别对 AAA 和 ADL 进行定量分析。一致性由总体、阳性和阴性一致性定义。结果:ELISA和基于SPR的检测方法能够识别ADL治疗患者体内的循环AAA,不同方法的阳性率不同,总体一致性为79%。ELISA法检测出47名接受治疗的患者中有18人(38%)体内存在AAA,而SPR法检测出47份样本中有10人(21%)体内存在AAA:结论:基于实时无标记 SPR 法的 AAA 和 ADL 定量方案已经建立。尽管与酶联免疫吸附法相比在定量方面存在差异,但各种方法之间的一致性很高,特别是在药物治疗窗内的 ADL 定量方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal changes in plasma Cystatin C and all-cause mortality risk among the middle-aged and elderly Chinese population Biochemical exploration of cholestasis: interpretation, traps and interferences A survey of Canadian neurologists’ perspectives and preferences for laboratory reporting of CSF oligoclonal banding Discordance between creatinine and cystatin C-based estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in solid organ transplant patients. Evaluation of the applicability of urine lateral flow immunochromatography tests for the detection of cocaine in plasma samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1