Amit C Achhra, Elizabeth Chan, Serina Applebaum, Maggie Guerrero, Ritche Hao, Haddon Pantel, Michael Virata, Margaret Fikrig, Lydia Barakat
{"title":"Five-year evaluation of Anal Cancer Screening Program in Men Who Have Sex With Men with HIV at Two Academic Center Clinics.","authors":"Amit C Achhra, Elizabeth Chan, Serina Applebaum, Maggie Guerrero, Ritche Hao, Haddon Pantel, Michael Virata, Margaret Fikrig, Lydia Barakat","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend annual anal cytology-based squamous cell carcinoma of anus (SCCA) screening for men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV aged ≥35 years (eligible population). Recommended threshold for high resolution anoscopy (HRA) depends on its availability: low-threshold (any abnormal cytology) if availability is high, and high-threshold (High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) on cytology) if availability is low.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review (2018-2022) at academic HIV clinics. We evaluate (i) 5-year uptake of cytology based SCCA screening in eligible population; (ii) estimate HSIL detection rate based on our current low-threshold criteria, and if high-threshold criteria were used for HRA referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 432 eligible individuals, only 219 (50.7%) had at least one, and only 113 (26%) had >1 SCCA screening tests in a median followup of 4 years. N=74 (17.1%) of individuals had at least one abnormal anal cytology during follow-up, of which 56 (75.6%) received HRA. Increasing age (≥57 years) and history of smoking negatively correlated with ever receiving screening. Anal cytology (365 tests in 206 individuals) showed: 17.5% 'unsatisfactory', and 26.8% with any abnormal cytology (zero with HSIL) triggering HRA referral. Only 34 individuals (7.8% of screening eligible) were ever detected with HSIL. Strictly using high-threshold criterion for HRA referral would have led to no HRA or HSIL detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We noted poor uptake of screening over time, particularly in older age groups. Importantly, anal cytology performed poorly as a triage test for HRA referral: high rates of 'unsatisfactory' samples and low sensitivity for detecting HSIL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae541","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Guidelines recommend annual anal cytology-based squamous cell carcinoma of anus (SCCA) screening for men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV aged ≥35 years (eligible population). Recommended threshold for high resolution anoscopy (HRA) depends on its availability: low-threshold (any abnormal cytology) if availability is high, and high-threshold (High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) on cytology) if availability is low.
Methods: Retrospective chart review (2018-2022) at academic HIV clinics. We evaluate (i) 5-year uptake of cytology based SCCA screening in eligible population; (ii) estimate HSIL detection rate based on our current low-threshold criteria, and if high-threshold criteria were used for HRA referral.
Results: Of 432 eligible individuals, only 219 (50.7%) had at least one, and only 113 (26%) had >1 SCCA screening tests in a median followup of 4 years. N=74 (17.1%) of individuals had at least one abnormal anal cytology during follow-up, of which 56 (75.6%) received HRA. Increasing age (≥57 years) and history of smoking negatively correlated with ever receiving screening. Anal cytology (365 tests in 206 individuals) showed: 17.5% 'unsatisfactory', and 26.8% with any abnormal cytology (zero with HSIL) triggering HRA referral. Only 34 individuals (7.8% of screening eligible) were ever detected with HSIL. Strictly using high-threshold criterion for HRA referral would have led to no HRA or HSIL detection.
Conclusions: We noted poor uptake of screening over time, particularly in older age groups. Importantly, anal cytology performed poorly as a triage test for HRA referral: high rates of 'unsatisfactory' samples and low sensitivity for detecting HSIL.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
