Role of admission rapid antigen testing (RATs) for COVID-19 on patients transferred from acute hospitals to a postacute rehabilitation setting

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2024.10.031
Ann Gaffney MSc, PG Cert, RGN , Edmond G. Smyth MB, MsC, FRCPath, FRCPI , Zena Moore PhD, MSc, FFNMRCSI, PGDip, RGN , Declan Patton PhD, MSc, PGDipEd, PGCRM, BNS(Hons), RNT, RPN , Tom O' Connor RGN, RNT, Dip Nur, BSc, MSc Ad Nursing, PGDipEd, EdD , Rosemarie Derwin
{"title":"Role of admission rapid antigen testing (RATs) for COVID-19 on patients transferred from acute hospitals to a postacute rehabilitation setting","authors":"Ann Gaffney MSc, PG Cert, RGN ,&nbsp;Edmond G. Smyth MB, MsC, FRCPath, FRCPI ,&nbsp;Zena Moore PhD, MSc, FFNMRCSI, PGDip, RGN ,&nbsp;Declan Patton PhD, MSc, PGDipEd, PGCRM, BNS(Hons), RNT, RPN ,&nbsp;Tom O' Connor RGN, RNT, Dip Nur, BSc, MSc Ad Nursing, PGDipEd, EdD ,&nbsp;Rosemarie Derwin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.10.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rapid antigen tests (RATs) are suitable for point-of-care testing, require no laboratory time, and give immediate results. However, are RATs useful for detecting asymptomatic COVID-19 infection when compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in health care settings?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>RAT testing was carried out on all new admissions without a history of confirmed COVID-19 infection within 3 months of admission. PCR testing was carried out on all patients with a positive RAT for confirmation purposes. The cycle threshold values of COVID-19-detected results on PCR testing were examined to determine the utility of the RATs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,403 patients were transferred to the postacute rehabilitation unit from January to December 2023. The results of the study revealed an 85% accuracy of RATs with a 15% rate of false-negative results at the time of admission. All patients who had a positive RAT at the time of admission also had a positive PCR test.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This testing algorithm resulted in early detection and prompt isolation of positive cases reducing the likely spread of COVID-19 infection, hospital outbreaks, and bed/ward closures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":"53 3","pages":"Pages 357-360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655324008228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rapid antigen tests (RATs) are suitable for point-of-care testing, require no laboratory time, and give immediate results. However, are RATs useful for detecting asymptomatic COVID-19 infection when compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in health care settings?

Methods

RAT testing was carried out on all new admissions without a history of confirmed COVID-19 infection within 3 months of admission. PCR testing was carried out on all patients with a positive RAT for confirmation purposes. The cycle threshold values of COVID-19-detected results on PCR testing were examined to determine the utility of the RATs.

Results

A total of 1,403 patients were transferred to the postacute rehabilitation unit from January to December 2023. The results of the study revealed an 85% accuracy of RATs with a 15% rate of false-negative results at the time of admission. All patients who had a positive RAT at the time of admission also had a positive PCR test.

Conclusions

This testing algorithm resulted in early detection and prompt isolation of positive cases reducing the likely spread of COVID-19 infection, hospital outbreaks, and bed/ward closures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入院快速抗原检测(RATs)对从急症医院转入康复后环境的患者进行 COVID-19 检测的作用。
背景:快速抗原检测(RAT)适用于医疗点检测,无需实验室时间,并能立即得到结果。然而,在医疗机构中,与聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测相比,快速抗原检测对检测无症状的 COVID-19 感染是否有用?目的:本研究的目的是利用快速抗原检测实施可靠的检测系统,以便在从急诊医院转入急性期后康复病房(PARU)的主要无症状患者中快速检测 COVID-19 感染:方法:对入院后三个月内没有确诊Covid-19感染病史的所有新入院患者进行RAT检测。对所有 RAT 检测呈阳性的患者进行 PCR 检测,以进行确认。研究了 PCR 检测结果中 COVID-19 的周期阈值(Ct),以确定 RATs 的效用:2023年1月至12月,共有1403名患者转入PARU。研究结果显示,RATs 的准确率为 85%,入院时的假阴性结果率为 15%。所有在入院时RAT呈阳性的患者的PCR检测结果也都呈阳性:这种检测算法可及早发现并及时隔离阳性病例,从而减少 COVID-19 感染的传播、医院疫情爆发和病床/病房关闭的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Timeliness in Public Health Emergency Response: An Epidemiological Assessment of a Statewide SARS-CoV-2 Testing Initiative (April 2020-July 2021). Analysis of positivity rate among contact screening for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales by room and carbapenemase type. A Decade of Change: Comparative Findings from the 2015, 2020, and 2025 APIC MegaSurveys on the Infection Prevention Workforce. Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Among Utah Medicaid Recipients: A 4-Year Population-Based Analysis. The Quality of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions on Surgical Infection Prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1