Quantitative Analysis of the Brachialis and Triceps Brachii Insertion Sites on the Proximal Epiphysis of the Ulna in Modern Hominid Primates and Fossil Hominins

IF 2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY American Journal of Primatology Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1002/ajp.23690
Neus Ciurana, Aroa Casado, Patrícia Rodríguez, Marcel García, Francisco Pastor, Josep M. Potau
{"title":"Quantitative Analysis of the Brachialis and Triceps Brachii Insertion Sites on the Proximal Epiphysis of the Ulna in Modern Hominid Primates and Fossil Hominins","authors":"Neus Ciurana,&nbsp;Aroa Casado,&nbsp;Patrícia Rodríguez,&nbsp;Marcel García,&nbsp;Francisco Pastor,&nbsp;Josep M. Potau","doi":"10.1002/ajp.23690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In several species of hominid primates with different types of locomotor behavior, we quantitatively studied the insertion sites of the brachialis and triceps brachii on the proximal epiphysis of the ulna. Our main objective was to evaluate the possibility of using the anatomical features of these insertion sites to infer the locomotor behavior of different species of fossil hominins. We measured the area of these muscle insertion sites using 3D bone meshes and obtained the value of each insertion site relative to the total size of the two insertion sites for each of the species studied. We also compared these relative values of the osteological samples with the relative mass of the brachialis and triceps brachii, which we obtained by dissecting these muscles in the same primate species. The relative values for the brachialis insertion were highest in orangutans, followed by bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans. Fossil <i>Australopithecus</i> and <i>Paranthropus</i> had values similar to those of bonobos, while fossil <i>Homo</i> had values similar to those of <i>Homo sapiens</i>. The observed similarity in ulnar attachment sites between <i>Australopithecus</i> and <i>Paranthropus</i> and extant bonobos suggest that these hominins used arboreal locomotion to complement their bipedalism. These adaptations to arboreal locomotion were not observed in <i>Homo</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"86 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajp.23690","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.23690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In several species of hominid primates with different types of locomotor behavior, we quantitatively studied the insertion sites of the brachialis and triceps brachii on the proximal epiphysis of the ulna. Our main objective was to evaluate the possibility of using the anatomical features of these insertion sites to infer the locomotor behavior of different species of fossil hominins. We measured the area of these muscle insertion sites using 3D bone meshes and obtained the value of each insertion site relative to the total size of the two insertion sites for each of the species studied. We also compared these relative values of the osteological samples with the relative mass of the brachialis and triceps brachii, which we obtained by dissecting these muscles in the same primate species. The relative values for the brachialis insertion were highest in orangutans, followed by bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans. Fossil Australopithecus and Paranthropus had values similar to those of bonobos, while fossil Homo had values similar to those of Homo sapiens. The observed similarity in ulnar attachment sites between Australopithecus and Paranthropus and extant bonobos suggest that these hominins used arboreal locomotion to complement their bipedalism. These adaptations to arboreal locomotion were not observed in Homo.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代类人灵长类和化石类人猿的肱肌和肱三头肌在乌骨近端骨骺上的插入位置定量分析。
在具有不同运动行为的几种类人灵长类动物中,我们定量研究了肱肌和肱三头肌在尺骨近端骨骺上的插入部位。我们的主要目的是评估利用这些插入部位的解剖特征来推断不同种类化石人的运动行为的可能性。我们使用三维骨骼网格测量了这些肌肉插入部位的面积,并获得了每个插入部位相对于所研究的每个物种的两个插入部位的总面积的数值。我们还将这些骨学样本的相对值与肱肌和肱三头肌的相对质量进行了比较,后者是我们通过解剖同一灵长类动物的肱肌和肱三头肌而获得的。猩猩肱肌插入部的相对值最高,其次是倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩和人类。化石南猿和古人类的数值与倭黑猩猩相似,而化石智人的数值与智人相似。观察到的澳洲人和古人类与现存倭黑猩猩尺骨附着点的相似性表明,这些类人猿利用树栖运动来补充其两足运动。在智人身上没有观察到这些对树栖运动的适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike. Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Analysis of the Carpal Tunnel and Its Inner Structures in Primates. Detecting a Stalker: The Effect of Body Posture, Gaze Direction, and Camouflage Pattern on Predator Detection. Teeth Baring as a Model to Understand Complex Facial Signals in a Tolerant Macaque Species. Issue Information Stable Isotopes Analysis of Black Lion Tamarins Reveals Increasing Arthropod Consumption When Fruit Productivity Decreases in Forest Fragments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1