Evaluation of the quality of physiotherapy service in university of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, northwest Ethiopia: A mixed method evaluation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1111/jep.14221
Kaleab Mesfin Abera, Geta Asrade Alemayehu, Muluken Girma Kebede, Yohannes Abich, Yohannes Awoke Assefa
{"title":"Evaluation of the quality of physiotherapy service in university of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, northwest Ethiopia: A mixed method evaluation.","authors":"Kaleab Mesfin Abera, Geta Asrade Alemayehu, Muluken Girma Kebede, Yohannes Abich, Yohannes Awoke Assefa","doi":"10.1111/jep.14221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the number of people with physical disability and impairment is increasing significantly in Ethiopia, especially in the northern part. In that regard, the Ethiopian government has been providing physical rehabilitation services to recover patients. However, due to the widespread problem of healthcare service and the increase in patients seeking physiotherapy service, the quality of the service might be compromised, and the evidence is limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the quality of physiotherapy services at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, northwest Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single case study with concurrent mixed method research design was conducted from June 02- August 10, 2022. The evaluation used patient-centeredness, timeliness, compliance and availability dimensions with 27 indicators. A total of 415 systematically selected patients who came for physiotherapy service for exit interviews, 9 service providers and managers for key-informant interviews, and 8 patients for in-depth interviews participated in the study. Approximately 176 patient medical charts were reviewed, and direct observation of 14 patient-provider interactions was performed. Binary logistic regression analysis was computed to identify factors associated with patient-centeredness. In the final model, variables with a p value < 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to declare statistical significance. Thematic analysis for the qualitative data using OPEN CODE version 4.03 was performed. Finally, the dimensions and overall quality of physiotherapy service were judged using predetermined criteria.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The overall quality of the physiotherapy service was found to be fair or intermediate (66.5%), computed from the availability of resources 63.4%, compliance of service providers 68.6%, timelines 64.2%, and patient centeredness 73.1%. Qualitative findings also revealed that insufficient staffing and heavy workload, lack of resources, inconvenient facilities, relocation of resources in the academic division of physiotherapy department, lack of training and continuous professional development opportunities, lack management attention and institutional support and nonexistence of multidisciplinary approaches leads to significant gaps in quality service delivery. Attending primary school (AOR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.56, 6.61), secondary (AOR = 4.24, 1.91, 9.41), and higher education (AOR = 4.79, 1.94, 11.84) and being a private employee (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.76) were significantly associated with patient centeredness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall quality of physiotherapy service was deemed intermediate and needs further improvement. The required resources, such as clinical assessment tools, therapeutic exercise equipment, electrotherapy modalities and infrastructure, were not adequate. Educational level and occupation were significantly associated with patient centeredness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, the number of people with physical disability and impairment is increasing significantly in Ethiopia, especially in the northern part. In that regard, the Ethiopian government has been providing physical rehabilitation services to recover patients. However, due to the widespread problem of healthcare service and the increase in patients seeking physiotherapy service, the quality of the service might be compromised, and the evidence is limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the quality of physiotherapy services at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, northwest Ethiopia.

Methods: A single case study with concurrent mixed method research design was conducted from June 02- August 10, 2022. The evaluation used patient-centeredness, timeliness, compliance and availability dimensions with 27 indicators. A total of 415 systematically selected patients who came for physiotherapy service for exit interviews, 9 service providers and managers for key-informant interviews, and 8 patients for in-depth interviews participated in the study. Approximately 176 patient medical charts were reviewed, and direct observation of 14 patient-provider interactions was performed. Binary logistic regression analysis was computed to identify factors associated with patient-centeredness. In the final model, variables with a p value < 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to declare statistical significance. Thematic analysis for the qualitative data using OPEN CODE version 4.03 was performed. Finally, the dimensions and overall quality of physiotherapy service were judged using predetermined criteria.

Result: The overall quality of the physiotherapy service was found to be fair or intermediate (66.5%), computed from the availability of resources 63.4%, compliance of service providers 68.6%, timelines 64.2%, and patient centeredness 73.1%. Qualitative findings also revealed that insufficient staffing and heavy workload, lack of resources, inconvenient facilities, relocation of resources in the academic division of physiotherapy department, lack of training and continuous professional development opportunities, lack management attention and institutional support and nonexistence of multidisciplinary approaches leads to significant gaps in quality service delivery. Attending primary school (AOR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.56, 6.61), secondary (AOR = 4.24, 1.91, 9.41), and higher education (AOR = 4.79, 1.94, 11.84) and being a private employee (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.76) were significantly associated with patient centeredness.

Conclusion: The overall quality of physiotherapy service was deemed intermediate and needs further improvement. The required resources, such as clinical assessment tools, therapeutic exercise equipment, electrotherapy modalities and infrastructure, were not adequate. Educational level and occupation were significantly associated with patient centeredness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学综合专科医院物理治疗服务质量评估:混合方法评估。
背景:目前,埃塞俄比亚,尤其是北部地区的肢体残疾和损伤人数正在大幅增加。为此,埃塞俄比亚政府一直在为康复患者提供物理康复服务。然而,由于医疗服务问题普遍存在,寻求物理治疗服务的患者人数增加,服务质量可能会受到影响,而且证据有限。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学综合专科医院的物理治疗服务质量:方法:2022 年 6 月 2 日至 8 月 10 日进行了一项采用并行混合方法研究设计的单一案例研究。评估采用了以患者为中心、及时性、依从性和可用性等方面的 27 项指标。共有 415 名系统选取的前来接受物理治疗服务的患者参与了出口访谈,9 名服务提供者和管理人员参与了关键信息提供者访谈,8 名患者参与了深度访谈。研究人员查阅了约 176 份患者病历,并直接观察了 14 次患者与服务提供者之间的互动。通过二元逻辑回归分析,确定了与 "以患者为中心 "相关的因素。在最终模型中,p 值为 0 的变量为结果:物理治疗服务的总体质量为一般或中等(66.5%),其中资源可用性占 63.4%,服务提供者的依从性占 68.6%,时间安排占 64.2%,以患者为中心占 73.1%。定性研究结果还显示,人员配备不足和工作量繁重、资源匮乏、设施不便、物理治疗部学术分部的资源迁移、缺乏培训和持续专业发展机会、缺乏管理关注和机构支持以及不存在多学科方法等因素导致在提供优质服务方面存在巨大差距。就读小学(AOR = 3.22,95% CI:1.56,6.61)、中学(AOR = 4.24,1.91,9.41)和高等教育(AOR = 4.79,1.94,11.84)以及私人雇员(AOR = 0.34,95% CI:0.16,0.76)与以患者为中心显著相关:物理治疗服务的整体质量处于中等水平,需要进一步提高。临床评估工具、治疗性运动设备、电疗模式和基础设施等所需资源不足。教育水平和职业与以病人为中心有很大关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
AttributeRank: An Algorithm for Attribute Ranking in Clinical Variable Selection The 6-Item Self-Efficacy Scale in Chronic Disease Management in Women With Endometriosis: A Turkish Validity and Reliability Study Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale for the Italian Paediatric Population Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Content Validation of the Yonsei Lifestyle Profile for Older Adults in the United States Effect of Excess Mortality on Longevity During the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1