Improvement of the outcome of the saphenous vein graft when connected to the internal thoracic artery.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1478166
Konstantinos Katsavrias, Sotirios Prapas, Antonio M Calafiore, David Taggart, Dimitrios Angouras, Dimitrios Iliopoulos, Michele Di Mauro, Styliani Papandreopoulos, Panayiotis Zografos, Dimitrios Dougenis
{"title":"Improvement of the outcome of the saphenous vein graft when connected to the internal thoracic artery.","authors":"Konstantinos Katsavrias, Sotirios Prapas, Antonio M Calafiore, David Taggart, Dimitrios Angouras, Dimitrios Iliopoulos, Michele Di Mauro, Styliani Papandreopoulos, Panayiotis Zografos, Dimitrios Dougenis","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1478166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 2000, we have been grafting the right coronary artery system (RCAs) using the proximal portion of the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) as the inflow of the saphenous vein graft (SVG) to increase the number of patients undergoing beating heart complete myocardial revascularization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2000 to 2022, 928 consecutive patients underwent SVG on the RCAs. In 546 patients (58.8%), the inflow was the RITA (I-graft group), and in 382 patients (41.2%), the inflow was the aorta (Ao-graft group). The inclusion criteria were age ≤75 years, ejection fraction >35%, only one SVG per patient, bilateral internal thoracic arteries as a Y-graft on the left system (three-vessel disease, <i>n</i> = 817, 88.0%) or left internal thoracic artery on the left anterior descending artery and RITA + SVG on the RCAs (two-vessel disease, <i>n</i> = 111, 12.0%). Propensity matching identified 306 patients per group. After a median follow-up of 8 (5-10) years, graft patency was assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography in 132 patients (64 in the I-graft group and 68 in the Ao-graft group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early results were similar in both groups. The I-graft group had higher 10-year survival and freedom from main adverse cardiac events (90.0 ± 2.0 vs. 80.6 ± 3.8, <i>p</i> = 0.0162, and 81.3 ± 2.7 vs. 64.7 ± 5.6, <i>p</i> = 0.0206, respectively). When RITA was the inflow, SVG had a higher estimated 10-year patency rate (82.8% ± 6.5 vs. 58.8% ± 7.4, <i>p</i> = 0.0026) and a smaller inner lumen diameter (2.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the inflow is the RITA, SVG grafted to the RCAs (I-graft) may result in a higher patency rate and better outcome than when the inflow is the ascending aorta (Ao-graft). The continuous supply of nitric oxide by RITA may be the cause of the higher patency rate of the I-graft, which can behave like an arterial conduit.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1478166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1478166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since 2000, we have been grafting the right coronary artery system (RCAs) using the proximal portion of the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) as the inflow of the saphenous vein graft (SVG) to increase the number of patients undergoing beating heart complete myocardial revascularization.

Methods: From 2000 to 2022, 928 consecutive patients underwent SVG on the RCAs. In 546 patients (58.8%), the inflow was the RITA (I-graft group), and in 382 patients (41.2%), the inflow was the aorta (Ao-graft group). The inclusion criteria were age ≤75 years, ejection fraction >35%, only one SVG per patient, bilateral internal thoracic arteries as a Y-graft on the left system (three-vessel disease, n = 817, 88.0%) or left internal thoracic artery on the left anterior descending artery and RITA + SVG on the RCAs (two-vessel disease, n = 111, 12.0%). Propensity matching identified 306 patients per group. After a median follow-up of 8 (5-10) years, graft patency was assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography in 132 patients (64 in the I-graft group and 68 in the Ao-graft group).

Results: Early results were similar in both groups. The I-graft group had higher 10-year survival and freedom from main adverse cardiac events (90.0 ± 2.0 vs. 80.6 ± 3.8, p = 0.0162, and 81.3 ± 2.7 vs. 64.7 ± 5.6, p = 0.0206, respectively). When RITA was the inflow, SVG had a higher estimated 10-year patency rate (82.8% ± 6.5 vs. 58.8% ± 7.4, p = 0.0026) and a smaller inner lumen diameter (2.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: When the inflow is the RITA, SVG grafted to the RCAs (I-graft) may result in a higher patency rate and better outcome than when the inflow is the ascending aorta (Ao-graft). The continuous supply of nitric oxide by RITA may be the cause of the higher patency rate of the I-graft, which can behave like an arterial conduit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大隐静脉移植与胸内动脉连接后的效果改善。
背景:自2000年起,我们开始使用右胸内动脉(RITA)的近端部分作为大隐静脉移植(SVG)的流入端,对右冠状动脉系统(RCA)进行移植,以增加接受心脏跳动完全心肌血运重建术的患者数量:2000年至2022年,928名患者连续在RCA上接受了SVG手术。其中546例患者(58.8%)的血流来源为RITA(I-移植物组),382例患者(41.2%)的血流来源为主动脉(Ao-移植物组)。纳入标准为年龄小于 75 岁,射血分数大于 35%,每个患者只有一个 SVG,双侧胸内动脉作为 Y 型移植位于左侧系统(三血管疾病,n = 817,88.0%)或左侧胸内动脉位于左前降支动脉,RITA + SVG 位于 RCA(两血管疾病,n = 111,12.0%)。倾向匹配确定了每组 306 名患者。中位随访 8(5-10)年后,通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影评估了 132 例患者(I 型移植物组 64 例,Ao 型移植物组 68 例)的移植物通畅性:结果:两组患者的早期结果相似。结果:两组的早期结果相似,I型移植组的10年生存率和无主要不良心脏事件发生率更高(分别为90.0 ± 2.0 vs. 80.6 ± 3.8,p = 0.0162和81.3 ± 2.7 vs. 64.7 ± 5.6,p = 0.0206)。当 RITA 流入时,SVG 的估计 10 年通畅率更高(82.8% ± 6.5 vs. 58.8% ± 7.4,p = 0.0026),内腔直径更小(2.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6 mm,p与升主动脉(Ao-移植物)相比,当流入动脉为 RITA 时,SVG 移植到 RCA(I-移植物)可获得更高的通畅率和更好的疗效。RITA持续供应一氧化氮可能是I型移植物通畅率较高的原因,因为I型移植物的作用类似于动脉导管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
期刊最新文献
Case Report: One-stop procedure for atrial fibrillation patients with dextrocardia. Case Report: Surgical management of traumatic giant coronary artery pseudoaneurysm with pericardial patch repair and ostium isolation. Eradicating rheumatic heart disease in Africa: have we made progress since the Drakensberg declaration? Inter-site comparability of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements in healthy traveling volunteers-a multi-site and multi-magnetic field strength study. Predictive value of percutaneous peripheral arterial compliance T in left ventricular diastolic function with coronary artery disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1