Global R-wave peak time for diagnosis of left bundle branch capture

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.038
Grzegorz Kiełbasa MD, PhD , Paweł Moskal MD, PhD , Agnieszka Bednarek MD, PhD , Ignacy Jastrzębski , Patryk Stanisław Michel , Marek Rajzer MD, PhD , Marek Jastrzębski MD, PhD
{"title":"Global R-wave peak time for diagnosis of left bundle branch capture","authors":"Grzegorz Kiełbasa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Paweł Moskal MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Bednarek MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ignacy Jastrzębski ,&nbsp;Patryk Stanisław Michel ,&nbsp;Marek Rajzer MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marek Jastrzębski MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>QRS axis deviation and rS configuration in V6 affect the ability of V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT) criterion to discriminate capture type during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We hypothesized that combining RWPTs from lateral leads: I, aVL, V5, and V6 may better reflect left ventricular activation time and that such a global RWPT may be insensitive to changes in QRS configuration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The analysis included 519 electrocardiograms (ECGs) with nonselective left bundle branch pacing (nsLBBP) and 176 ECGs with left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). Optimal RWPT cutoffs and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were determined for each lead and combinations of leads, to find the best RWPT criterion for discriminating nsLBBP from LVSP. Values were reported separately for healthy and diseased left conduction system groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The highest AUC of 97.1/89.2% was obtained for the global RWPT, which combined leads I and V6. The AUC for single-lead RWPT, was highest for lead I, followed by V6, V5, and aVL with AUC of 95.1/87.4%, 93.6/87.1%, 93.0/86.5%, and 84.8/74.6%, respectively. The global RWPT criterion was not affected by variations in QRS configuration, as V6 and I RWPTs often showed opposite responses to changes in axis. In contrast, all single-lead RWPT criteria were sensitive to axis deviation and QRS configuration. Diagnostically optimal RWPT cutoffs for global RWPT and lead I RWPT were 162.5/187.5 ms, and 81.5/90.5 ms, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The global RWPT criterion allows a more accurate diagnosis of LBBAP capture type independent of QRS configuration and axis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 7","pages":"Pages 1736-1745"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124034647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

QRS axis deviation and rS configuration in V6 affect the ability of V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT) criterion to discriminate capture type during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).

Objective

We hypothesized that combining RWPTs from lateral leads: I, aVL, V5, and V6 may better reflect left ventricular activation time and that such a global RWPT may be insensitive to changes in QRS configuration.

Methods

The analysis included 519 electrocardiograms (ECGs) with nonselective left bundle branch pacing (nsLBBP) and 176 ECGs with left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). Optimal RWPT cutoffs and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were determined for each lead and combinations of leads, to find the best RWPT criterion for discriminating nsLBBP from LVSP. Values were reported separately for healthy and diseased left conduction system groups.

Results

The highest AUC of 97.1/89.2% was obtained for the global RWPT, which combined leads I and V6. The AUC for single-lead RWPT, was highest for lead I, followed by V6, V5, and aVL with AUC of 95.1/87.4%, 93.6/87.1%, 93.0/86.5%, and 84.8/74.6%, respectively. The global RWPT criterion was not affected by variations in QRS configuration, as V6 and I RWPTs often showed opposite responses to changes in axis. In contrast, all single-lead RWPT criteria were sensitive to axis deviation and QRS configuration. Diagnostically optimal RWPT cutoffs for global RWPT and lead I RWPT were 162.5/187.5 ms, and 81.5/90.5 ms, respectively.

Conclusion

The global RWPT criterion allows a more accurate diagnosis of LBBAP capture type independent of QRS configuration and axis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于诊断左束支截获的全局 R 波峰值时间。
背景:左束支区起搏(LBBAP)时,V6 的 QRS 轴偏差和 rS 构型会影响 V6 R 波峰值时间(RWPT)标准判别捕获类型的能力:我们假设将来自侧导联 I、aVL、V5 和 V6 的 R 波峰值时间(RWPT)结合在一起,会影响左束支区起搏(LBBAP)时 V6 R 波峰值时间(RWPT)判别捕获类型的能力:目的:我们假设,将 I、aVL、V5 和 V6 侧导联的 RWPT 结合在一起可以更好地反映左心室的激活时间,而且这种全局 RWPT 可能对 QRS 构型的变化不敏感:分析包括 519 张采用非选择性左束支起搏(nsLBBP)的心电图和 176 张采用左室间隔起搏(LVSP)的心电图。为每个导联和导联组合确定了最佳 RWPT 截止值和接收器工作曲线下面积 (AUC),以找到区分 nsLBBP 和 LVSP 的最佳 RWPT 标准。分别报告了左传导系统健康/疾病组的数值:结合 I 号和 V6 号导联的全局 RWPT 的 AUC 最高,为 97.1/89.2%。单导联 RWPT 的 AUC 以 I 导联最高,其次是 V6、V5 和 aVL,AUC 分别为 95.1/87.4%、93.6/87.1%、93.0/86.5% 和 84.8/74.6%。全局 RWPT 标准不受 QRS 构型变化的影响,因为 V6 和 I RWPT 对轴的变化往往表现出相反的反应。相反,所有单导联 RWPT 标准对轴线偏差和 QRS 构型都很敏感。全局 RWPT 和 I 导联 RWPT 的最佳诊断 RWPT 切点分别为 162.5/187.5 毫秒和 81.5/90.5 毫秒:全局 RWPT 标准能更准确地诊断 LBBAP 捕获类型,而不受 QRS 构型和轴线的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Occupational hazards in cardiac electrophysiology: Insights from an HRS member survey. Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Biventricular and Conduction System Pacing Outcomes. Comparison of Combined Anatomical and Functional Modelling with Purely Anatomical Assessment in Scar-dependent Ventricular Tachycardia. Can Oral Anticoagulants Be Safely Discontinued Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data. Frailty and Risk of Death Without Device Therapy Among Patients with Primary Prophylaxis Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: The CERTITUDE Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1