{"title":"Shoal size as a key variable in fish behavioral ecotoxicology: an example using sertraline.","authors":"Asma Al Shuraiqi, Michael J Barry","doi":"10.1007/s10646-024-02826-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A significant limitation of behavioral ecotoxicology is the challenge of obtaining reproducible results due to a wide range of testing conditions. In particular, shoal size affects almost all aspects of fish behavior, but is rarely considered as a factor in ecotoxicological studies. In the present study, we compared the swimming and antipredator responses of different sized shoals of Arabian killifish (Aphaniops stoliczkanus) after exposure to environmentally realistic concentrations of the antidepressant medication sertraline. Groups of fish (1, 3 or 5 individuals) were exposed to either 5 or 50 ng/L sertraline. After 37 days, swimming behavior and responses to a predator alarm were measured. We found that the effects of group size were much stronger than the effects of sertraline on swimming. Group size was also the major factor influencing responses to the predator alarm, with single fish showing the strongest responses. Sertraline directly affected acceleration, turning speed and average distance to the arena wall. For all three parameters, there were significant interactions with shoal size, demonstrating that responses differed depending on the size of the group. We also found that effects of sertraline could still be observed 14 days after cessation of exposure. The study highlights the importance of considering social context and specifically shoal size when designing behavioral studies on chemicals. Failure to consider this may result in over- or under-estimation of risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02826-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A significant limitation of behavioral ecotoxicology is the challenge of obtaining reproducible results due to a wide range of testing conditions. In particular, shoal size affects almost all aspects of fish behavior, but is rarely considered as a factor in ecotoxicological studies. In the present study, we compared the swimming and antipredator responses of different sized shoals of Arabian killifish (Aphaniops stoliczkanus) after exposure to environmentally realistic concentrations of the antidepressant medication sertraline. Groups of fish (1, 3 or 5 individuals) were exposed to either 5 or 50 ng/L sertraline. After 37 days, swimming behavior and responses to a predator alarm were measured. We found that the effects of group size were much stronger than the effects of sertraline on swimming. Group size was also the major factor influencing responses to the predator alarm, with single fish showing the strongest responses. Sertraline directly affected acceleration, turning speed and average distance to the arena wall. For all three parameters, there were significant interactions with shoal size, demonstrating that responses differed depending on the size of the group. We also found that effects of sertraline could still be observed 14 days after cessation of exposure. The study highlights the importance of considering social context and specifically shoal size when designing behavioral studies on chemicals. Failure to consider this may result in over- or under-estimation of risks.
期刊介绍:
Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.