Hospital COVID-19 Burden and Adverse Event Rates.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42936
Mark L Metersky, David Rodrick, Shih-Yieh Ho, Deron Galusha, Andrea Timashenka, Erin N Grace, Darryl Marshall, Sheila Eckenrode, Harlan M Krumholz
{"title":"Hospital COVID-19 Burden and Adverse Event Rates.","authors":"Mark L Metersky, David Rodrick, Shih-Yieh Ho, Deron Galusha, Andrea Timashenka, Erin N Grace, Darryl Marshall, Sheila Eckenrode, Harlan M Krumholz","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic introduced stresses on hospitals due to the surge in demand for care and to staffing shortages. The implications of these stresses for patient safety are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with the rate of in-hospital adverse effects (AEs).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Quality and Safety Review System, a surveillance system that tracks the frequency of AEs among selected hospital admissions across the US. The study sample included randomly selected Medicare patient admissions to acute care hospitals in the US between September 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was the association between frequency of AEs and hospital-specific weekly COVID-19 burden. Observed and risk-adjusted rates of AEs per 1000 admissions were stratified by the weekly hospital-specific COVID-19 burden (daily mean number of COVID-19 inpatients per 100 hospital beds each week), presented as less than the 25th percentile (lowest burden), 25th to 75th percentile (intermediate burden), and greater than the 75th percentile (highest burden). Risk adjustment variables included patient and hospital characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 40 737 Medicare hospital admissions (4114 patients [10.1%] with COVID-19 and 36 623 [89.9%] without); mean (SD) patient age was 73.8 (12.1) years, 53.8% were female, and the median number of Elixhauser comorbidities was 4 (IQR, 2-5). There were 59.1 (95% CI, 54.5-64.0) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 77.0 (95% CI, 73.3-80.9) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 97.4 (95% CI, 91.6-103.7) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. Among patients without COVID-19, there were 55.7 (95% CI, 51.1-60.8) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 74.0 (95% CI, 70.2-78.1) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 79.3 (95% CI, 73.7-85.3) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. A similar pattern was seen among patients with COVID-19. After risk adjustment, the relative risk (RR) for AEs among patients admitted during weeks with high compared with low COVID-19 burden for all patients was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P < .001), with similar results seen in the cohorts with (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = .03) and without (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = .002) COVID-19 individually.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of hospital admissions among Medicare patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, greater hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital AEs among both patients with and without COVID-19. These results illustrate the need for greater hospital resilience and surge capacity to prevent declines in patient safety during surges in demand.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2442936"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42936","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic introduced stresses on hospitals due to the surge in demand for care and to staffing shortages. The implications of these stresses for patient safety are not well understood.

Objective: To assess whether hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with the rate of in-hospital adverse effects (AEs).

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Quality and Safety Review System, a surveillance system that tracks the frequency of AEs among selected hospital admissions across the US. The study sample included randomly selected Medicare patient admissions to acute care hospitals in the US between September 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was the association between frequency of AEs and hospital-specific weekly COVID-19 burden. Observed and risk-adjusted rates of AEs per 1000 admissions were stratified by the weekly hospital-specific COVID-19 burden (daily mean number of COVID-19 inpatients per 100 hospital beds each week), presented as less than the 25th percentile (lowest burden), 25th to 75th percentile (intermediate burden), and greater than the 75th percentile (highest burden). Risk adjustment variables included patient and hospital characteristics.

Results: The study included 40 737 Medicare hospital admissions (4114 patients [10.1%] with COVID-19 and 36 623 [89.9%] without); mean (SD) patient age was 73.8 (12.1) years, 53.8% were female, and the median number of Elixhauser comorbidities was 4 (IQR, 2-5). There were 59.1 (95% CI, 54.5-64.0) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 77.0 (95% CI, 73.3-80.9) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 97.4 (95% CI, 91.6-103.7) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. Among patients without COVID-19, there were 55.7 (95% CI, 51.1-60.8) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 74.0 (95% CI, 70.2-78.1) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 79.3 (95% CI, 73.7-85.3) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. A similar pattern was seen among patients with COVID-19. After risk adjustment, the relative risk (RR) for AEs among patients admitted during weeks with high compared with low COVID-19 burden for all patients was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P < .001), with similar results seen in the cohorts with (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = .03) and without (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = .002) COVID-19 individually.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of hospital admissions among Medicare patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, greater hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital AEs among both patients with and without COVID-19. These results illustrate the need for greater hospital resilience and surge capacity to prevent declines in patient safety during surges in demand.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院 COVID-19 负担和不良事件发生率。
重要性:COVID-19 大流行给医院带来了压力,原因是护理需求激增和人员短缺。这些压力对患者安全的影响尚不十分清楚:评估医院的 COVID-19 负担是否与院内不良反应(AEs)率有关:这项队列研究使用的数据来自美国医疗保健研究与质量局的质量与安全审查系统,该系统是一个监测系统,用于跟踪全美选定入院患者的不良反应发生频率。研究样本包括 2020 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间随机抽取的美国急症医院住院的医疗保险患者:主要结果是AEs频率与特定医院每周COVID-19负担之间的关联。每1000例入院患者中观察到的AEs发生率和风险调整后的发生率按医院特异性每周COVID-19负担(每周每100张病床COVID-19住院患者的日平均人数)进行分层,分别为小于第25百分位数(最低负担)、第25至75百分位数(中等负担)和大于第75百分位数(最高负担)。风险调整变量包括患者和医院特征:研究纳入了 40 737 名医保住院患者(4114 名患者[10.1%]患有 COVID-19,36 623 名患者[89.9%]未患有 COVID-19);患者平均(标清)年龄为 73.8(12.1)岁,53.8% 为女性,Elixhauser 合并症的中位数为 4(IQR,2-5)。在 COVID-19 负担最低的几周内,每 1000 例住院患者中有 59.1 例(95% CI,54.5-64.0)AEs;在 COVID-19 负担居中的几周内,每 1000 例住院患者中有 77.0 例(95% CI,73.3-80.9)AEs;在 COVID-19 负担最高的几周内,每 1000 例住院患者中有 97.4 例(95% CI,91.6-103.7)AEs。在没有 COVID-19 的患者中,在 COVID-19 负担最低的几周,每 1000 例入院患者中发生 55.7 例(95% CI,51.1-60.8)AEs;在 COVID-19 负担中等的几周,每 1000 例入院患者中发生 74.0 例(95% CI,70.2-78.1)AEs;在 COVID-19 负担最高的几周,每 1000 例入院患者中发生 79.3 例(95% CI,73.7-85.3)AEs。在 COVID-19 患者中也出现了类似的情况。经风险调整后,所有患者在 COVID-19 负担较高与较低的几周内入院发生 AEs 的相对风险 (RR) 为 1.23(95% CI,1.09-1.39;P 结论及意义:在这项关于 COVID-19 大流行期间医保患者入院情况的队列研究中,COVID-19 负担越重的医院与 COVID-19 患者和非 COVID-19 患者的院内 AEs 风险增加相关。这些结果表明,在需求激增时,医院需要提高应变能力和应急能力,以防止患者安全下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Network Open. Meal Timing Interventions for Weight Loss and Metabolic Health-What Does the Evidence Tell Us So Far? Saving Children's Lives Through Universal Pediatric Readiness Is a Wise Investment. Anemia Acuity Effect on Transfusion Strategies in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the MINT Trial. Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1