Time Spent Near Maximal Oxygen Uptake During Exercise at Different Regions of the Severe-Intensity Domain.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004986
Robin Faricier, Pablo R Fleitas-Paniagua, Danilo Iannetta, Guillaume Y Millet, Daniel A Keir, Juan M Murias
{"title":"Time Spent Near Maximal Oxygen Uptake During Exercise at Different Regions of the Severe-Intensity Domain.","authors":"Robin Faricier, Pablo R Fleitas-Paniagua, Danilo Iannetta, Guillaume Y Millet, Daniel A Keir, Juan M Murias","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Faricier, R, Fleitas-Paniagua, PR, Iannetta, D, Millet, GY, Keir, DA, and Murias, JM. Time spent near maximal oxygen uptake during exercise at different regions of the severe-intensity domain. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study applied the critical power (CP) model and several bouts of constant-power exercise within different regions of the severe-intensity domain to determine whether there exists an optimal intensity to maximize time spent near V̇o2peak. Subjects visited the laboratory 9 times. After a ramp-incremental test to determine V̇o2peak and peak power output (POpeak), 9 active individuals (5 females) performed 4 constant-power bouts to task failure between 65 and 100%POpeak to estimate CP and total finite work above CP (W'). Subjects then completed 4 additional exhaustive trials predicted to result in task failure in ∼3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes. Time spent at V̇o2peak was calculated as the duration at which V̇o2 ≥ 95% of the trial-specific V̇o2peak. The level of significance set for the study was p < 0.05. Mean CP and W' were 201 ± 48 W and 17.6 ± 8.4 kJ, respectively. For each bout, time to task failure was 2.7 ± 0.5, 6.3 ± 0.6, 9.5 ± 1.2, and 13.1 ± 3.1 minutes for the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-minute conditions. Time spent at V̇o2peak during the 3-minute trial (45 ± 22 seconds) was shorter than during the 9-minute (204 ± 104 seconds; p = 0.002) and 12-minute trials (260 ± 155 seconds; p < 0.001). The 6-minute trial (117 ± 46 seconds) had shorter (p = 0.005) time spent at V̇o2peak compared with the 12-minute trial. At least when performing single bouts of exercise, intensities closer to CP (i.e., those sustainable for ∼9 minutes or longer) seem preferable compared with POs in the upper regions of the severe-intensity domain to maximize time at V̇o2peak.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Faricier, R, Fleitas-Paniagua, PR, Iannetta, D, Millet, GY, Keir, DA, and Murias, JM. Time spent near maximal oxygen uptake during exercise at different regions of the severe-intensity domain. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study applied the critical power (CP) model and several bouts of constant-power exercise within different regions of the severe-intensity domain to determine whether there exists an optimal intensity to maximize time spent near V̇o2peak. Subjects visited the laboratory 9 times. After a ramp-incremental test to determine V̇o2peak and peak power output (POpeak), 9 active individuals (5 females) performed 4 constant-power bouts to task failure between 65 and 100%POpeak to estimate CP and total finite work above CP (W'). Subjects then completed 4 additional exhaustive trials predicted to result in task failure in ∼3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes. Time spent at V̇o2peak was calculated as the duration at which V̇o2 ≥ 95% of the trial-specific V̇o2peak. The level of significance set for the study was p < 0.05. Mean CP and W' were 201 ± 48 W and 17.6 ± 8.4 kJ, respectively. For each bout, time to task failure was 2.7 ± 0.5, 6.3 ± 0.6, 9.5 ± 1.2, and 13.1 ± 3.1 minutes for the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-minute conditions. Time spent at V̇o2peak during the 3-minute trial (45 ± 22 seconds) was shorter than during the 9-minute (204 ± 104 seconds; p = 0.002) and 12-minute trials (260 ± 155 seconds; p < 0.001). The 6-minute trial (117 ± 46 seconds) had shorter (p = 0.005) time spent at V̇o2peak compared with the 12-minute trial. At least when performing single bouts of exercise, intensities closer to CP (i.e., those sustainable for ∼9 minutes or longer) seem preferable compared with POs in the upper regions of the severe-intensity domain to maximize time at V̇o2peak.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在运动中接近最大摄氧量的时间在严重强度域的不同区域。
Abstract: Faricier, R, Fleitas-Paniagua, PR, Iannetta, D, Millet, GY, Keir, DA, and Murias, JM.严重强度域不同区域运动时接近最大摄氧量的时间。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024--本研究应用临界功率(CP)模型和在剧烈强度域的不同区域进行的几次恒定功率运动,以确定是否存在最佳强度,从而最大限度地延长接近 V̇o2peak 的时间。受试者到实验室进行了 9 次锻炼。在进行斜坡递增测试以确定 V̇o2peak 和峰值功率输出(POpeak)之后,9 名活跃的受试者(5 名女性)在 65% 至 100%POpeak 之间进行了 4 次恒定功率测试,以估算 CP 和 CP 以上的总有限功(W')。然后,受试者分别在 3 分钟、6 分钟、9 分钟和 12 分钟内完成另外 4 次预计会导致任务失败的力竭试验。达到 V.J.o.2峰值的时间计算为 V.J.o.2≥特定试验 V.J.o.2峰值 95% 的持续时间。研究的显著性水平为 p <0.05。CP和W'的平均值分别为201 ± 48 W和17.6 ± 8.4 kJ。在 3 分钟、6 分钟、9 分钟和 12 分钟的条件下,每次任务失败的时间分别为 2.7 ± 0.5 分钟、6.3 ± 0.6 分钟、9.5 ± 1.2 分钟和 13.1 ± 3.1 分钟。在 3 分钟试验(45 ± 22 秒)中,达到 V̇2 峰值的时间短于 9 分钟试验(204 ± 104 秒;p = 0.002)和 12 分钟试验(260 ± 155 秒;p < 0.001)。与 12 分钟的试验相比,6 分钟的试验(117 ± 46 秒)花费在 V̇o2peak 的时间更短(p = 0.005)。至少在进行单次运动时,强度接近 CP(即可持续 9 分钟或更长时间)似乎比处于严重强度域上部区域的 PO 更佳,以最大限度地延长 V̇o2peak 时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Linear and Multidirectional Speed Testing (On-Field and Off-Field) Protocols in Senior and Elite Female Football. Understanding Training Load in Golf: A Survey of Swing Coaches, Performance Practitioners, and Medical Staff. Self-Regulated Learning Assessment in Young Soccer Players: Beyond Competitive Levels. Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1