Racial disparities in prosthesis use, satisfaction, and physical function in upper limb amputation and the impact of veteran status.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13275
Linda Resnik, Anthony I Roberts, Matthew Borgia
{"title":"Racial disparities in prosthesis use, satisfaction, and physical function in upper limb amputation and the impact of veteran status.","authors":"Linda Resnik, Anthony I Roberts, Matthew Borgia","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research found that Black veterans with upper limb amputation (ULA) reported greater disability and need for assistance compared to White veterans. The extent to which racial disparities in outcomes exist outside of the Department of Veterans Affairs has not been explored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine racial disparities in physical function and prosthesis satisfaction among individuals with ULA and assess the potential moderating role of veteran status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-dwelling participants.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>U.S. veterans and civilians with ULA.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Physical function measures included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity Amputation-specific (PROMIS-UE AMP), and Upper Extremity Functional Scale for Prosthesis Users (UEFS-P) for one-handed and two-handed tasks. Prosthesis satisfaction measures included the modified Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) Comfort, Appearance, and Utility scales, the CSD-8, and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Satisfaction (TAPES) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 713 participants, 79% were male, with mean age of 61.3 years. The racial composition was 83.6% White, 9.1% Black, and 7.3% other, with 75.4% identifying as veterans. Multivariable linear regression found that Black participants (compared to White) had lower PROMIS 13-UE AMP (β: -5.1, 95% CI: -7.7 to -2.5) and UEFS-P Two-Handed Task Scale (β: -4.0, 95% CI: -7.3 to -2.1) scores. Satisfaction scores were lower for Black participants as measured by modified CSD Comfort (β: -3.9, 95% CI: -7.2 to -0.6), Appearance (β: -4.4, 95% CI: -7.5 to -1.2), Utility (β: -3.9, 95% CI: -7.2 to -0.6), and CSD-8 (β: -3.9, 95% CI: -7.2 to -0.6) scales. Veteran status moderated the impact of Black race on the UEFS-P Two-Handed Task Scale and the TAPES.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black individuals with ULA had worse physical function and prosthesis satisfaction than White individuals. Although veteran status moderated these disparities, the reasons for these disparities remain unclear. Further research is essential to understand the causes of these disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior research found that Black veterans with upper limb amputation (ULA) reported greater disability and need for assistance compared to White veterans. The extent to which racial disparities in outcomes exist outside of the Department of Veterans Affairs has not been explored.

Objective: To examine racial disparities in physical function and prosthesis satisfaction among individuals with ULA and assess the potential moderating role of veteran status.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Community-dwelling participants.

Participants: U.S. veterans and civilians with ULA.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Physical function measures included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity Amputation-specific (PROMIS-UE AMP), and Upper Extremity Functional Scale for Prosthesis Users (UEFS-P) for one-handed and two-handed tasks. Prosthesis satisfaction measures included the modified Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) Comfort, Appearance, and Utility scales, the CSD-8, and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Satisfaction (TAPES) scale.

Results: Of 713 participants, 79% were male, with mean age of 61.3 years. The racial composition was 83.6% White, 9.1% Black, and 7.3% other, with 75.4% identifying as veterans. Multivariable linear regression found that Black participants (compared to White) had lower PROMIS 13-UE AMP (β: -5.1, 95% CI: -7.7 to -2.5) and UEFS-P Two-Handed Task Scale (β: -4.0, 95% CI: -7.3 to -2.1) scores. Satisfaction scores were lower for Black participants as measured by modified CSD Comfort (β: -3.9, 95% CI: -7.2 to -0.6), Appearance (β: -4.4, 95% CI: -7.5 to -1.2), Utility (β: -3.9, 95% CI: -7.2 to -0.6), and CSD-8 (β: -3.9, 95% CI: -7.2 to -0.6) scales. Veteran status moderated the impact of Black race on the UEFS-P Two-Handed Task Scale and the TAPES.

Conclusions: Black individuals with ULA had worse physical function and prosthesis satisfaction than White individuals. Although veteran status moderated these disparities, the reasons for these disparities remain unclear. Further research is essential to understand the causes of these disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上肢截肢患者在假肢使用、满意度和身体功能方面的种族差异以及退伍军人身份的影响。
背景:先前的研究发现,与白人退伍军人相比,上肢截肢(ULA)的黑人退伍军人的残疾程度更高,需要的援助也更多。但在退伍军人事务部之外,种族差异在多大程度上存在尚未探讨:研究 ULA 患者在身体功能和假肢满意度方面的种族差异,并评估退伍军人身份的潜在调节作用:设计:横断面调查:参与者:居住在社区的美国退伍军人和平民:干预措施:不适用:主要结果测量身体功能测量包括患者报告结果测量信息系统-上肢截肢特异性(PROMIS-UE AMP)和假肢使用者上肢功能量表(UEFS-P),分别用于单手和双手任务。假肢满意度测量包括改良的客户假肢满意度(CSD)舒适度、外观和实用性量表、CSD-8 量表以及三位一体截肢和假肢体验满意度(TAPES)量表:在 713 名参与者中,79% 为男性,平均年龄为 61.3 岁。种族构成中,白人占 83.6%,黑人占 9.1%,其他种族占 7.3%,75.4% 的人自称是退伍军人。多变量线性回归发现,黑人参与者(与白人相比)的 PROMIS 13-UE AMP(β:-5.1,95% CI:-7.7 至 -2.5)和 UEFS-P 双手任务量表(β:-4.0,95% CI:-7.3 至 -2.1)得分较低。根据修改后的 CSD 舒适度量表(β:-3.9,95% CI:-7.2 至-0.6)、外观量表(β:-4.4,95% CI:-7.5 至-1.2)、实用性量表(β:-3.9,95% CI:-7.2 至-0.6)和 CSD-8 量表(β:-3.9,95% CI:-7.2 至-0.6),黑人参与者的满意度得分较低。退伍军人身份调节了黑人种族对 UEFS-P 双手任务量表和 TAPES 的影响:结论:与白人相比,患有 ULA 的黑人的身体功能和假肢满意度更差。尽管退伍军人身份可以调节这些差异,但造成这些差异的原因仍不清楚。进一步的研究对于了解这些差异的原因至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle. Self-perceived preparedness for practice among graduating physical medicine & rehabilitation residents. Knee joint mechanics during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a partial or full thickness quadriceps tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery. Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury. Racial disparities in prosthesis use, satisfaction, and physical function in upper limb amputation and the impact of veteran status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1