Quality Improvement to Identify and Address Food Insecurity During Pediatric Hospitalizations.

IF 2.1 Q1 Nursing Hospital pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2024-007926
Cristin Q Fritz, Gabrielle C Lyons, Amber R Monaghan, Joseph R Starnes, Sarah Hart, Caroline B Khanna, David P Johnson
{"title":"Quality Improvement to Identify and Address Food Insecurity During Pediatric Hospitalizations.","authors":"Cristin Q Fritz, Gabrielle C Lyons, Amber R Monaghan, Joseph R Starnes, Sarah Hart, Caroline B Khanna, David P Johnson","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-007926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hospitalized children represent a vulnerable population with high rates of unidentified food insecurity (FI). We aimed to improve FI screening for eligible families from 0% to 60%. Secondarily, we sought to provide location-based food resources to families that screened positive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2021, we developed a multidisciplinary team and used the Model for Improvement to improve routine FI screening for eligible children on 1 inpatient unit at a single institution. Our primary measure was the overall percentage of eligible families screened for FI. Our secondary measure was the percentage of families with FI who received food resource information. Statistical process control charts were used to analyze the impact of our interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8850 families were eligible for screening during the project period. The percentage of eligible families screened for FI increased from 0 to a mean of 77%, exceeding our goal, with special cause variation noted by 5 centerline shifts. The most impactful interventions were expansion of screening to patients admitted to all services and making FI screening questions required nursing admission documentation. Eleven percent of families screened positive for FI. Provision of resources increased from 56% with manual resource insertion into the after-visit summary to 100% with special cause variation associated with automated resource provision for positive screens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating FI screening into the nursing admission workflow with automated resource provision for positive screens is a feasible approach to integrating FI screening into routine clinical practice during pediatric hospitalizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"963-972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Hospitalized children represent a vulnerable population with high rates of unidentified food insecurity (FI). We aimed to improve FI screening for eligible families from 0% to 60%. Secondarily, we sought to provide location-based food resources to families that screened positive.

Methods: In February 2021, we developed a multidisciplinary team and used the Model for Improvement to improve routine FI screening for eligible children on 1 inpatient unit at a single institution. Our primary measure was the overall percentage of eligible families screened for FI. Our secondary measure was the percentage of families with FI who received food resource information. Statistical process control charts were used to analyze the impact of our interventions.

Results: A total of 8850 families were eligible for screening during the project period. The percentage of eligible families screened for FI increased from 0 to a mean of 77%, exceeding our goal, with special cause variation noted by 5 centerline shifts. The most impactful interventions were expansion of screening to patients admitted to all services and making FI screening questions required nursing admission documentation. Eleven percent of families screened positive for FI. Provision of resources increased from 56% with manual resource insertion into the after-visit summary to 100% with special cause variation associated with automated resource provision for positive screens.

Conclusions: Integrating FI screening into the nursing admission workflow with automated resource provision for positive screens is a feasible approach to integrating FI screening into routine clinical practice during pediatric hospitalizations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高质量,识别并解决儿科住院期间的食物不安全问题。
目的:住院儿童是一个弱势人群,他们的食物不安全(FI)率很高。我们的目标是将合格家庭的食物无保障筛查率从 0% 提高到 60%。其次,我们试图为筛查结果呈阳性的家庭提供基于地点的食物资源:2021 年 2 月,我们成立了一个多学科团队,并使用 "改进模式 "改进了一家机构 1 个住院部符合条件的儿童的常规 FI 筛查。我们的主要衡量指标是接受 FI 筛查的合格家庭的总体比例。我们的次要衡量指标是获得食物资源信息的 FI 家庭的百分比。我们使用统计过程控制图来分析干预措施的效果:在项目实施期间,共有 8850 个家庭符合筛查条件。符合筛查条件的家庭中获得食物资源信息的比例从 0% 增加到了平均 77%,超过了我们的目标,其中有 5 个中心线班次出现了特殊原因的变化。最有影响的干预措施是将筛查范围扩大到所有服务机构的入院病人,并将 FI 筛查问题作为护理入院文件的必备内容。11% 的家庭筛查出 FI 阳性。资源提供率从人工将资源插入诊后摘要的 56% 提高到了 100%,但与筛查结果呈阳性的自动资源提供相关的特殊原因变异有所增加:结论:将 FI 筛查纳入护理入院工作流程,并对阳性筛查自动提供资源,是将 FI 筛查纳入儿科住院期间常规临床实践的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
期刊最新文献
Forming Community Partnerships to Create Social Needs Referral Programs. Disparities in the Care of Febrile Infants: Embedding Equity in Every Step of Quality Improvement. A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Febrile Young Infants. The National Landscape of Hospitalizations for Children With Medical Complexity. Institutional Variation in Fentanyl Use for Children on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1