Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Therapy With or Without Immunotherapy Followed By Pneumonectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.10.007
Zhixin Li, Leilei Wu, Chong Wang, Shaodong Wang, Qiankun Chen, Wenxin He
{"title":"Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Therapy With or Without Immunotherapy Followed By Pneumonectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.","authors":"Zhixin Li, Leilei Wu, Chong Wang, Shaodong Wang, Qiankun Chen, Wenxin He","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited data concerning pneumonectomy after preoperative induction therapy. Our study aimed to evaluate feasibility and safety of pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by assessing postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1187 patients who underwent pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed from 3 hospitals in China. Propensity score matching was adopted to form a balanced cohort between neoadjuvant therapy and non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Efficacy and survival were compared for neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neoadjuvant group had larger tumors (4.7 ± 2.2 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.9 cm [P < .001]; cT4, 36.3% vs 19.1% [P < .001]), had a greater rate of N2 metastases (64.5% vs 33.3%; P < .001), and were at a more advanced clinical TNM stage (stage III, 89.4% vs 58.6%; P < .001). No significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed between the groups before and after propensity score matching (43.5% vs 42.9% [P = .975]; 49.4% vs 41.9% [P = .162]). The complete pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was significantly superior to that of chemotherapy alone (27.7% vs 2.0%; P < .001), and no significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed in neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy. The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group also obtained a survival benefit with a 3-year overall survival (79.8% vs 67.5%; P = .001) and a 3-year event-free survival (63.3% vs 41.2%; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After neoadjuvant therapy with immunotherapy, pneumonectomy can be safely performed in selected patients without increased postoperative morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.10.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are limited data concerning pneumonectomy after preoperative induction therapy. Our study aimed to evaluate feasibility and safety of pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by assessing postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A total of 1187 patients who underwent pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed from 3 hospitals in China. Propensity score matching was adopted to form a balanced cohort between neoadjuvant therapy and non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Efficacy and survival were compared for neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy.

Results: The neoadjuvant group had larger tumors (4.7 ± 2.2 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.9 cm [P < .001]; cT4, 36.3% vs 19.1% [P < .001]), had a greater rate of N2 metastases (64.5% vs 33.3%; P < .001), and were at a more advanced clinical TNM stage (stage III, 89.4% vs 58.6%; P < .001). No significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed between the groups before and after propensity score matching (43.5% vs 42.9% [P = .975]; 49.4% vs 41.9% [P = .162]). The complete pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was significantly superior to that of chemotherapy alone (27.7% vs 2.0%; P < .001), and no significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed in neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy. The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group also obtained a survival benefit with a 3-year overall survival (79.8% vs 67.5%; P = .001) and a 3-year event-free survival (63.3% vs 41.2%; P = .004).

Conclusions: After neoadjuvant therapy with immunotherapy, pneumonectomy can be safely performed in selected patients without increased postoperative morbidity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非小细胞肺癌患者接受新辅助治疗(含/不含免疫疗法)后进行肺切除术的疗效。
背景:关于术前诱导治疗后的肺切除术的数据有限。我们的研究旨在通过评估术后结果,评估非小细胞肺癌患者接受新辅助免疫疗法后进行肺切除术的可行性和安全性:方法: 我们对中国三家医院的1187例非小细胞肺癌患者进行了回顾性分析。采用倾向分数匹配法(PSM)在新辅助治疗组和非新辅助治疗组之间建立平衡队列。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归来确定术后发病率的风险因素。比较了新辅助治疗联合或不联合免疫疗法的疗效和生存率:结果:新辅助治疗组的肿瘤更大(4.7±2.2 vs. 3.9±1.9cm,PC结论):经过免疫疗法的新辅助治疗后,可以安全地对部分患者实施肺切除术,且不会增加术后发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Contents Announcements Editorial Board Society Board Welcomed Insight Into Patients With Pneumothorax Who Have Connective Tissue Disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1