{"title":"To speak or not to speak? A secondary data analysis to further explore the context-insensitive avoidance scale.","authors":"Pernilla Abrahamsson, Katja Boersma, Monica Buhrman","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Inflexibly relying on avoidance of expression may increase and perpetuate pain-related emotional distress in patients with chronic pain. The context-insensitive avoidance (CIA) scale was recently developed to measure the degree to which patients avoid expressing their pain and distress in social situations. This study explored the psychometric properties of the CIA scale in a new sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses baseline data from a treatment trial for <i>n</i> = 115 patients with chronic pain and co-occurring emotional distress. Reliability and construct and criteria validity were studied using the same instruments as in the original psychometric study and further explored in two new measures. A series of multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between the CIA scale and criteria variables compared to the other psychological constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CIA scale showed good reliability. Significant correlations between high scores on the CIA scale and low scores on self-compassion and activity engagement could be replicated. Significant correlations between high scores on the CIA scale and high scores of pain intensity and pain interference could also be replicated. In the exploring part of this study, validity was extended to general problems with emotion regulation and to satisfaction with life in general and contact with friends but not to satisfaction with family, partner, or sexual life. Avoidance of expression was the only significant predictor of pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study could replicate acceptable psychometric properties of a scale measuring CIA of expression. As in the original study, avoidance of expression was associated with increased suffering. Clinically, this instrument may be used to identify patients who may otherwise remain in aggravating silence. Theoretically, it introduces the important concept of context sensitivity to the field of chronic pain. Limitations include uncertainty about causal relationships, and that several important social situations were not examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Inflexibly relying on avoidance of expression may increase and perpetuate pain-related emotional distress in patients with chronic pain. The context-insensitive avoidance (CIA) scale was recently developed to measure the degree to which patients avoid expressing their pain and distress in social situations. This study explored the psychometric properties of the CIA scale in a new sample.
Methods: This study uses baseline data from a treatment trial for n = 115 patients with chronic pain and co-occurring emotional distress. Reliability and construct and criteria validity were studied using the same instruments as in the original psychometric study and further explored in two new measures. A series of multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between the CIA scale and criteria variables compared to the other psychological constructs.
Results: The CIA scale showed good reliability. Significant correlations between high scores on the CIA scale and low scores on self-compassion and activity engagement could be replicated. Significant correlations between high scores on the CIA scale and high scores of pain intensity and pain interference could also be replicated. In the exploring part of this study, validity was extended to general problems with emotion regulation and to satisfaction with life in general and contact with friends but not to satisfaction with family, partner, or sexual life. Avoidance of expression was the only significant predictor of pain intensity.
Conclusion: This study could replicate acceptable psychometric properties of a scale measuring CIA of expression. As in the original study, avoidance of expression was associated with increased suffering. Clinically, this instrument may be used to identify patients who may otherwise remain in aggravating silence. Theoretically, it introduces the important concept of context sensitivity to the field of chronic pain. Limitations include uncertainty about causal relationships, and that several important social situations were not examined.
目的:在慢性疼痛患者中,一味地回避表达可能会增加和延续与疼痛相关的情绪困扰。最近开发了情境敏感回避量表(CIA),用于测量患者在社交场合回避表达疼痛和痛苦的程度。本研究在一个新样本中探讨了 CIA 量表的心理测量特性:本研究使用的基线数据来自一项治疗试验,试验对象为 n = 115 名患有慢性疼痛并同时伴有情绪困扰的患者。使用与原始心理测量研究相同的工具研究了信度、结构效度和标准效度,并在两个新的测量工具中进行了进一步探讨。我们进行了一系列多元回归分析,以评估 CIA 量表和标准变量与其他心理结构之间的关系:结果:CIA量表显示出良好的可靠性。CIA量表的高分与自我同情和活动参与度的低分之间的显著相关性可以被复制。CIA 量表的高分与疼痛强度和疼痛干扰的高分之间的显著相关性也可以被复制。在本研究的探索部分,有效性扩展到了情绪调节的一般问题以及对生活和与朋友接触的满意度,但不包括对家庭、伴侣或性生活的满意度。避免表达是唯一能显著预测疼痛强度的因素:结论:本研究复制了一个测量 CIA 表达的量表,其心理测量特性是可以接受的。与最初的研究一样,回避表达与疼痛加剧有关。在临床上,该工具可用于识别那些可能会保持沉默的患者。从理论上讲,它将情境敏感性这一重要概念引入了慢性疼痛领域。不足之处包括因果关系的不确定性,以及没有对几种重要的社会情境进行研究。