To speak or not to speak? A secondary data analysis to further explore the context-insensitive avoidance scale.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0039
Pernilla Abrahamsson, Katja Boersma, Monica Buhrman
{"title":"To speak or not to speak? A secondary data analysis to further explore the context-insensitive avoidance scale.","authors":"Pernilla Abrahamsson, Katja Boersma, Monica Buhrman","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Inflexibly relying on avoidance of expression may increase and perpetuate pain-related emotional distress in patients with chronic pain. The context-insensitive avoidance (CIA) scale was recently developed to measure the degree to which patients avoid expressing their pain and distress in social situations. This study explored the psychometric properties of the CIA scale in a new sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses baseline data from a treatment trial for <i>n</i> = 115 patients with chronic pain and co-occurring emotional distress. Reliability and construct and criteria validity were studied using the same instruments as in the original psychometric study and further explored in two new measures. A series of multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between the CIA scale and criteria variables compared to the other psychological constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CIA scale showed good reliability. Significant correlations between high scores on the CIA scale and low scores on self-compassion and activity engagement could be replicated. Significant correlations between high scores on the CIA scale and high scores of pain intensity and pain interference could also be replicated. In the exploring part of this study, validity was extended to general problems with emotion regulation and to satisfaction with life in general and contact with friends but not to satisfaction with family, partner, or sexual life. Avoidance of expression was the only significant predictor of pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study could replicate acceptable psychometric properties of a scale measuring CIA of expression. As in the original study, avoidance of expression was associated with increased suffering. Clinically, this instrument may be used to identify patients who may otherwise remain in aggravating silence. Theoretically, it introduces the important concept of context sensitivity to the field of chronic pain. Limitations include uncertainty about causal relationships, and that several important social situations were not examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Inflexibly relying on avoidance of expression may increase and perpetuate pain-related emotional distress in patients with chronic pain. The context-insensitive avoidance (CIA) scale was recently developed to measure the degree to which patients avoid expressing their pain and distress in social situations. This study explored the psychometric properties of the CIA scale in a new sample.

Methods: This study uses baseline data from a treatment trial for n = 115 patients with chronic pain and co-occurring emotional distress. Reliability and construct and criteria validity were studied using the same instruments as in the original psychometric study and further explored in two new measures. A series of multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between the CIA scale and criteria variables compared to the other psychological constructs.

Results: The CIA scale showed good reliability. Significant correlations between high scores on the CIA scale and low scores on self-compassion and activity engagement could be replicated. Significant correlations between high scores on the CIA scale and high scores of pain intensity and pain interference could also be replicated. In the exploring part of this study, validity was extended to general problems with emotion regulation and to satisfaction with life in general and contact with friends but not to satisfaction with family, partner, or sexual life. Avoidance of expression was the only significant predictor of pain intensity.

Conclusion: This study could replicate acceptable psychometric properties of a scale measuring CIA of expression. As in the original study, avoidance of expression was associated with increased suffering. Clinically, this instrument may be used to identify patients who may otherwise remain in aggravating silence. Theoretically, it introduces the important concept of context sensitivity to the field of chronic pain. Limitations include uncertainty about causal relationships, and that several important social situations were not examined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
说还是不说?通过二手数据分析进一步探索对情境不敏感的回避量表。
目的:在慢性疼痛患者中,一味地回避表达可能会增加和延续与疼痛相关的情绪困扰。最近开发了情境敏感回避量表(CIA),用于测量患者在社交场合回避表达疼痛和痛苦的程度。本研究在一个新样本中探讨了 CIA 量表的心理测量特性:本研究使用的基线数据来自一项治疗试验,试验对象为 n = 115 名患有慢性疼痛并同时伴有情绪困扰的患者。使用与原始心理测量研究相同的工具研究了信度、结构效度和标准效度,并在两个新的测量工具中进行了进一步探讨。我们进行了一系列多元回归分析,以评估 CIA 量表和标准变量与其他心理结构之间的关系:结果:CIA量表显示出良好的可靠性。CIA量表的高分与自我同情和活动参与度的低分之间的显著相关性可以被复制。CIA 量表的高分与疼痛强度和疼痛干扰的高分之间的显著相关性也可以被复制。在本研究的探索部分,有效性扩展到了情绪调节的一般问题以及对生活和与朋友接触的满意度,但不包括对家庭、伴侣或性生活的满意度。避免表达是唯一能显著预测疼痛强度的因素:结论:本研究复制了一个测量 CIA 表达的量表,其心理测量特性是可以接受的。与最初的研究一样,回避表达与疼痛加剧有关。在临床上,该工具可用于识别那些可能会保持沉默的患者。从理论上讲,它将情境敏感性这一重要概念引入了慢性疼痛领域。不足之处包括因果关系的不确定性,以及没有对几种重要的社会情境进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Stellate ganglion block in disparate treatment-resistant mental health disorders: A case series. A scoping review of the effectiveness of underwater treadmill exercise in clinical trials of chronic pain. Corrigendum to "Patient characteristics in relation to opioid exposure in a chronic non-cancer pain population". Association between clinical laboratory indicators and WOMAC scores in Qatar Biobank participants: The impact of testosterone and fibrinogen on pain, stiffness, and functional limitation. Effectiveness of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation vs heart rate variability biofeedback interventions for chronic pain conditions: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1