Periarticular Injection With or Without Adductor Canal Block for Pain Control Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.104
Ruth E Galle, Taylor P Stauffer, Niall H Cochrane, Justin Leal, William I Jiranek, Thorsten M Seyler, Michael P Bolognesi, Samuel S Wellman, Sean P Ryan
{"title":"Periarticular Injection With or Without Adductor Canal Block for Pain Control Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Ruth E Galle, Taylor P Stauffer, Niall H Cochrane, Justin Leal, William I Jiranek, Thorsten M Seyler, Michael P Bolognesi, Samuel S Wellman, Sean P Ryan","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Periarticular injections (PAIs) have become a critical part of multimodal anesthetic regimens for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study assessed the effect of adductor canal blocks (ACBs) alone, periarticular injections (PAIs) alone, and the combination of both ACBs and PAIs on postoperative pain management in patients undergoing primary TKA. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in postoperative outcomes, including pain scores and narcotic use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary TKA were retrospectively identified from February 2022 to February 2023. Patients were stratified based on perioperative local/regional anesthetic regimen (PAI only, PAI with an ACB, and ACB only) and matched in a 1:1:1 ratio. Patients were propensity score matched based on age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative narcotic usage. Patient demographics, as well as intra- and postoperative variables including narcotic refills, postoperative morphine requirements, pain scores, and readmissions, were compared. After successful matching, there were 40 patients in each cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores after surgery were not significantly different across all groups (P = 0.082). Pair-wise comparisons of patients receiving either PAI alone or ACB alone showed that patients receiving PAIs had lower narcotic usage at six hours (P = 0.037). A PAI alone also demonstrated a shorter length of stay compared to ACB alone (P = 0.001). Postoperative narcotics refills were similar between ACB only and PAI only (P = 0.056); however, PAI with an ACB had lower postoperative narcotic refills (P = 0.017). The rate of same-day physical therapy (PT) clearance was lowest in the ACB only group (37.5% [15 of 40]) (P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As hypothesized, there was no difference in pain scores immediately after surgery; however, postoperative morphine requirements at six hours, same-day physical therapy clearance, and length of stay were better in the PAI group. The use of PAIs may confer a benefit for both patients and healthcare systems as an adjunct to perioperative pain control.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Periarticular injections (PAIs) have become a critical part of multimodal anesthetic regimens for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study assessed the effect of adductor canal blocks (ACBs) alone, periarticular injections (PAIs) alone, and the combination of both ACBs and PAIs on postoperative pain management in patients undergoing primary TKA. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in postoperative outcomes, including pain scores and narcotic use.

Methods: Patients who underwent primary TKA were retrospectively identified from February 2022 to February 2023. Patients were stratified based on perioperative local/regional anesthetic regimen (PAI only, PAI with an ACB, and ACB only) and matched in a 1:1:1 ratio. Patients were propensity score matched based on age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative narcotic usage. Patient demographics, as well as intra- and postoperative variables including narcotic refills, postoperative morphine requirements, pain scores, and readmissions, were compared. After successful matching, there were 40 patients in each cohort.

Results: First post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores after surgery were not significantly different across all groups (P = 0.082). Pair-wise comparisons of patients receiving either PAI alone or ACB alone showed that patients receiving PAIs had lower narcotic usage at six hours (P = 0.037). A PAI alone also demonstrated a shorter length of stay compared to ACB alone (P = 0.001). Postoperative narcotics refills were similar between ACB only and PAI only (P = 0.056); however, PAI with an ACB had lower postoperative narcotic refills (P = 0.017). The rate of same-day physical therapy (PT) clearance was lowest in the ACB only group (37.5% [15 of 40]) (P = 0.002).

Conclusion: As hypothesized, there was no difference in pain scores immediately after surgery; however, postoperative morphine requirements at six hours, same-day physical therapy clearance, and length of stay were better in the PAI group. The use of PAIs may confer a benefit for both patients and healthcare systems as an adjunct to perioperative pain control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术后用关节周围注射配合或不配合内收肌窦阻滞止痛。
简介:关节周围注射(PAIs)已成为全膝关节置换术(TKA)多模式麻醉方案的重要组成部分。本研究评估了单独使用内收肌阻滞(ACB)、单独使用关节周围注射(PAIs)以及联合使用 ACB 和 PAIs 对初级 TKA 患者术后疼痛控制的影响。我们假设术后结果(包括疼痛评分和麻醉药使用)没有明显差异:我们对 2022 年 2 月至 2023 年 2 月期间接受初次 TKA 手术的患者进行了回顾性鉴定。根据围手术期局部/区域麻醉方案(仅 PAI、PAI 与 ACB 和仅 ACB)对患者进行分层,并按 1:1:1 的比例进行匹配。根据年龄、美国麻醉医师协会 (ASA) 评分、体重指数 (BMI) 和术前麻醉剂使用情况对患者进行倾向评分匹配。比较了患者的人口统计学特征以及术中和术后变量,包括麻醉剂补充量、术后吗啡需求量、疼痛评分和再入院率。配对成功后,每个队列中有 40 名患者:麻醉后护理病房(PACU)术后首次视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)评分在各组间无显著差异(P = 0.082)。对单独接受 PAI 或单独接受 ACB 的患者进行配对比较后发现,接受 PAI 的患者在六小时内使用的麻醉剂较少(P = 0.037)。与单纯 ACB 相比,单纯 PAI 患者的住院时间也更短(P = 0.001)。仅使用 ACB 和仅使用 PAI 的术后麻醉剂补给量相似(P = 0.056);但使用 ACB 的 PAI 术后麻醉剂补给量较低(P = 0.017)。仅使用 ACB 组的当天物理治疗(PT)清除率最低(37.5% [40 例中的 15 例])(P = 0.002):正如假设的那样,术后即刻疼痛评分没有差异;然而,PAI 组术后 6 小时吗啡需求量、当天物理治疗清除率和住院时间都更好。作为围手术期疼痛控制的辅助手段,使用 PAIs 可为患者和医疗系统带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review of Gender and Sex Terminology Use in Arthroplasty Research: There Is Room for Improvement. Recognizing the Sex Disparity in Surgeons Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty. Decreased Risk of Readmission and Complications With Preoperative GLP-1 Analog Use in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty. Increased Involvement of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the Rise of Polymicrobial Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Concomitant Extensor Mechanism Disruption and Soft-Tissue Defect: The Knee Arthroplasty Terrible Triad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1