New evidence for a 30–10 ka lithic assemblage at Jianshan Cave, Guangxi, South China

Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ara.2024.100563
Chun Tian , Hua Liang , Yanyan Yao , Jiazhi Li , Qizhi Jiang , Xi Mo , Bingsong Liang , Jianjun Guo , Wei Liao , Christopher J. Bae , Wei Wang
{"title":"New evidence for a 30–10 ka lithic assemblage at Jianshan Cave, Guangxi, South China","authors":"Chun Tian ,&nbsp;Hua Liang ,&nbsp;Yanyan Yao ,&nbsp;Jiazhi Li ,&nbsp;Qizhi Jiang ,&nbsp;Xi Mo ,&nbsp;Bingsong Liang ,&nbsp;Jianjun Guo ,&nbsp;Wei Liao ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Bae ,&nbsp;Wei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2024.100563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In South China, the terminal Pleistocene to early Holocene marks a crucial period of substantial changes in lithic technologies. However, due to a limited number of well-studied sites, the nature of lithic industries in some key geographic areas of South China remains unclear. This paper presents the technological analysis of the first reported Paleolithic site, Jianshan Cave, in the eastern part of Guangxi, South China. AMS <sup>14</sup>C dating of this site indicates a terminal Pleistocene to early Holocene age range (26000–10,000 cal. a BP). Technologically, the stone artifacts at this site were produced from low-quality and near-source raw materials, such as sandstone and igneous rock. The assemblage shows evidence of both direct hard hammer and bipolar percussion methods, but the cores are notably simple. Tool production is also simple and lacks regularity, with roughly retouched choppers and scrapers dominating the tool assemblage. Overall, the lithic technology at this site exhibits a strong sense of simplicity and expediency. Contrary to evidence from other South China sites, such simplicity and expediency have not been commonly observed during this period. Comparisons with contemporaneous sites reveal that the Jianshan lithic assemblage does not neatly conform to a specific cultural type, reinforcing the idea that significant complexity and variability existed among Late Paleolithic sites in southern China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226724000643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In South China, the terminal Pleistocene to early Holocene marks a crucial period of substantial changes in lithic technologies. However, due to a limited number of well-studied sites, the nature of lithic industries in some key geographic areas of South China remains unclear. This paper presents the technological analysis of the first reported Paleolithic site, Jianshan Cave, in the eastern part of Guangxi, South China. AMS 14C dating of this site indicates a terminal Pleistocene to early Holocene age range (26000–10,000 cal. a BP). Technologically, the stone artifacts at this site were produced from low-quality and near-source raw materials, such as sandstone and igneous rock. The assemblage shows evidence of both direct hard hammer and bipolar percussion methods, but the cores are notably simple. Tool production is also simple and lacks regularity, with roughly retouched choppers and scrapers dominating the tool assemblage. Overall, the lithic technology at this site exhibits a strong sense of simplicity and expediency. Contrary to evidence from other South China sites, such simplicity and expediency have not been commonly observed during this period. Comparisons with contemporaneous sites reveal that the Jianshan lithic assemblage does not neatly conform to a specific cultural type, reinforcing the idea that significant complexity and variability existed among Late Paleolithic sites in southern China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
中国南方广西尖山洞 30-10 ka ka 石器组合的新证据
在华南地区,晚更新世至全新世早期是石器技术发生重大变化的关键时期。然而,由于得到充分研究的遗址数量有限,华南一些重要地区的石器工业性质仍不清楚。本文对首次报道的旧石器时代遗址--位于华南广西东部的尖山洞--进行了技术分析。该遗址的 AMS 14C 测定结果表明,其年代在更新世末期至全新世早期(公元前 26000-10000 年)。从技术角度看,该遗址的石制品是用砂岩和火成岩等低质近源原料制作的。石器组合显示了直接硬锤法和双极打击法的痕迹,但石核明显简单。工具的制作也很简单,而且缺乏规律性,工具组合中以粗糙修饰的砍刀和刮削器为主。总体而言,该遗址的石器技术表现出强烈的简单性和便利性。与其他华南遗址的证据相反,在这一时期,这种简洁性和便利性并不常见。与同时代遗址的比较显示,尖山的石器组合并不完全符合某种特定的文化类型,这进一步证实了华南旧石器时代晚期遗址之间存在着巨大的复杂性和变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1