Effect of Microbubble Size, Composition, and Multiple Sonication Points on Sterile Inflammatory Response in Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00777
Payton J Martinez, Jane J Song, Jair I Castillo, John DeSisto, Kang-Ho Song, Adam L Green, Mark Borden
{"title":"Effect of Microbubble Size, Composition, and Multiple Sonication Points on Sterile Inflammatory Response in Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening.","authors":"Payton J Martinez, Jane J Song, Jair I Castillo, John DeSisto, Kang-Ho Song, Adam L Green, Mark Borden","doi":"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) using focused ultrasound (FUS) and microbubbles (MBs) has emerged as a promising technique for delivering therapeutics to the brain. However, the influence of various FUS and MB parameters on BBBO and subsequent sterile inflammatory response (SIR) remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of MB size and composition, as well as the number of FUS sonication points, on BBBO and SIR in an immunocompetent mouse model. Using MRI-guided MB + FUS, we targeted the striatum and assessed extravasation of an MRI contrast agent to assess BBBO and RNaseq to assess SIR. Our results revealed distinct effects of these parameters on BBBO and SIR. Specifically, at a matched microbubble volume dose (MVD), MB size did not affect the extent of BBBO, but smaller (1 μm diameter) MBs exhibited a lower classification of SIR than larger (3 or 5 μm diameter) MBs. Lipid-shelled microbubbles exhibited greater BBBO and a more pronounced SIR compared to albumin-shelled microbubbles, likely owing to the latter's poor <i>in vivo</i> stability. As expected, increasing the number of sonication points resulted in greater BBBO and SIR. Furthermore, correlation analysis revealed strong associations between passive cavitation detection measurements of harmonic and inertial MB echoes, BBBO, and the expression of SIR gene sets. Our findings highlight the critical role of MB and FUS parameters in modulating BBBO and subsequent SIR in the brain. These insights inform the development of targeted drug delivery strategies and the mitigation of adverse inflammatory reactions in neurological disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) using focused ultrasound (FUS) and microbubbles (MBs) has emerged as a promising technique for delivering therapeutics to the brain. However, the influence of various FUS and MB parameters on BBBO and subsequent sterile inflammatory response (SIR) remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of MB size and composition, as well as the number of FUS sonication points, on BBBO and SIR in an immunocompetent mouse model. Using MRI-guided MB + FUS, we targeted the striatum and assessed extravasation of an MRI contrast agent to assess BBBO and RNaseq to assess SIR. Our results revealed distinct effects of these parameters on BBBO and SIR. Specifically, at a matched microbubble volume dose (MVD), MB size did not affect the extent of BBBO, but smaller (1 μm diameter) MBs exhibited a lower classification of SIR than larger (3 or 5 μm diameter) MBs. Lipid-shelled microbubbles exhibited greater BBBO and a more pronounced SIR compared to albumin-shelled microbubbles, likely owing to the latter's poor in vivo stability. As expected, increasing the number of sonication points resulted in greater BBBO and SIR. Furthermore, correlation analysis revealed strong associations between passive cavitation detection measurements of harmonic and inertial MB echoes, BBBO, and the expression of SIR gene sets. Our findings highlight the critical role of MB and FUS parameters in modulating BBBO and subsequent SIR in the brain. These insights inform the development of targeted drug delivery strategies and the mitigation of adverse inflammatory reactions in neurological disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微泡大小、成分和多个超声点对聚焦超声介导的血脑屏障开放过程中无菌炎症反应的影响
利用聚焦超声(FUS)和微气泡(MBs)打开血脑屏障(BBBO)已成为向大脑输送治疗药物的一种前景广阔的技术。然而,各种 FUS 和微气泡参数对 BBBO 和随后的无菌炎症反应(SIR)的影响仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们研究了在免疫功能正常的小鼠模型中,MB的大小和组成以及FUS超声点的数量对BBBO和SIR的影响。利用 MRI 引导的 MB + FUS,我们以纹状体为靶点,评估 MRI 造影剂的外渗以评估 BBBO,评估 RNaseq 以评估 SIR。我们的结果表明,这些参数对 BBBO 和 SIR 有不同的影响。具体来说,在相匹配的微泡体积剂量(MVD)下,微泡大小不会影响BBBO的程度,但较小(直径1微米)的微泡表现出的SIR分类低于较大(直径3或5微米)的微泡。与白蛋白外壳的微泡相比,脂质外壳的微泡表现出更大的 BBBO 和更明显的 SIR,这可能是由于后者在体内的稳定性较差。不出所料,增加超声点数会导致更大的 BBBO 和 SIR。此外,相关分析表明,被动空化检测测量的谐波和惯性 MB 回声、BBBO 和 SIR 基因组的表达之间存在密切联系。我们的研究结果凸显了 MB 和 FUS 参数在调节脑内 BBBO 和随后的 SIR 中的关键作用。这些见解为开发有针对性的给药策略和减轻神经系统疾病的不良炎症反应提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Materials Science-Biomaterials
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
413
期刊介绍: ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics: Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture
期刊最新文献
Effect of Microbubble Size, Composition, and Multiple Sonication Points on Sterile Inflammatory Response in Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening. Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds: Recent Advances and Emerging Strategies in Bone Tissue Engineering. Enhanced Biodegradation of Silk Fibroin Hydrogel for Preventing Postoperative Adhesion. Platelet Membrane-Camouflaged Copper Doped CaO2 Biomimetic Nanomedicines for Breast Cancer Combination Treatment. Impact of Porosity and Stiffness of 3D Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds on Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Activation of Dendritic Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1