Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in elderly patients following sacral pressure sore reconstruction.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05526-9
Ji Won Jeong, Seungkeun Lee, Jun Ho Park
{"title":"Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in elderly patients following sacral pressure sore reconstruction.","authors":"Ji Won Jeong, Seungkeun Lee, Jun Ho Park","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05526-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure sores significantly affect elderly patients, with the sacrum being especially vulnerable, often due to its proximity to the anus and potential for fecal contamination. Despite preventive measures such as frequent repositioning and specialized cushions, some sores still necessitate surgical intervention. Postoperative care focuses on monitoring, hygiene, and pressure alleviation. This study assessed the efficacy of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (CI-NPWT) for postoperative wound management in patients with sacral pressure sores treated with local flaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on sacral sore patients who underwent reconstructive surgery from March 2019 through April 2023. Surgical procedures involved debridement and wound coverage using gluteal artery perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps, followed by postoperative monitoring. Patients were grouped into conventional monitoring or NPWT management, with the latter utilizing the INFOV.A.C. The therapy unit was calibrated to 125 mmHg. Data on patient demographics, flap metrics, fluid drainage amounts, and six-month postoperative outcomes were collected, and then analyzed with SPSS Statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study of 52 patients with sacral pressure sores, the NPWT group (n = 25) showed significantly fewer flap complications and a lower drainage volume on the seventh postoperative day (mean 17.2 cc) compared to the conventional dressing group (mean 27.8 cc, P < 0.05). No postoperative complications were observed in the NPWT group, whereas the conventional group (n = 27) experienced one infection and three cases of dehiscence. Both groups achieved a 100% flap survival rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (CI-NPWT) shows promise in reducing wound dehiscence and infection rates in elderly patients undergoing sacral pressure sore reconstruction with local flaps. However, further research with larger, randomized studies is needed to confirm its effectiveness as an alternative to conventional postoperative care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was retrospectively registered by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (No. 20-2023-25, Date: Mar. 24 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05526-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressure sores significantly affect elderly patients, with the sacrum being especially vulnerable, often due to its proximity to the anus and potential for fecal contamination. Despite preventive measures such as frequent repositioning and specialized cushions, some sores still necessitate surgical intervention. Postoperative care focuses on monitoring, hygiene, and pressure alleviation. This study assessed the efficacy of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (CI-NPWT) for postoperative wound management in patients with sacral pressure sores treated with local flaps.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on sacral sore patients who underwent reconstructive surgery from March 2019 through April 2023. Surgical procedures involved debridement and wound coverage using gluteal artery perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps, followed by postoperative monitoring. Patients were grouped into conventional monitoring or NPWT management, with the latter utilizing the INFOV.A.C. The therapy unit was calibrated to 125 mmHg. Data on patient demographics, flap metrics, fluid drainage amounts, and six-month postoperative outcomes were collected, and then analyzed with SPSS Statistics.

Results: In this study of 52 patients with sacral pressure sores, the NPWT group (n = 25) showed significantly fewer flap complications and a lower drainage volume on the seventh postoperative day (mean 17.2 cc) compared to the conventional dressing group (mean 27.8 cc, P < 0.05). No postoperative complications were observed in the NPWT group, whereas the conventional group (n = 27) experienced one infection and three cases of dehiscence. Both groups achieved a 100% flap survival rate.

Conclusion: Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (CI-NPWT) shows promise in reducing wound dehiscence and infection rates in elderly patients undergoing sacral pressure sore reconstruction with local flaps. However, further research with larger, randomized studies is needed to confirm its effectiveness as an alternative to conventional postoperative care.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (No. 20-2023-25, Date: Mar. 24 2023).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骶骨压疮重建术后老年患者的闭合切口负压伤口疗法(NPWT)。
背景:褥疮对老年患者的影响很大,骶骨尤其容易受到影响,这通常是因为骶骨靠近肛门,有可能受到粪便污染。尽管采取了经常调整体位和专用坐垫等预防措施,但仍有一些褥疮需要手术治疗。术后护理的重点是监测、卫生和减轻压力。本研究评估了闭合切口负压伤口疗法(CI-NPWT)在使用局部皮瓣治疗骶骨压疮患者术后伤口管理方面的疗效:对2019年3月至2023年4月期间接受重建手术的骶骨疮患者进行回顾性分析。手术过程包括清创和使用臀动脉穿孔筋膜皮瓣覆盖伤口,然后进行术后监测。患者被分为传统监测组和 NPWT 管理组,后者使用 INFOV.A.C。研究人员收集了有关患者人口统计学、皮瓣指标、液体引流量和术后六个月疗效的数据,然后用 SPSS 统计软件进行了分析:结果:在这项对 52 名骶骨压疮患者进行的研究中,与传统敷料组(平均 27.8 毫升,P 结论)相比,闭合切口负压伤口疗法组(n = 25)的皮瓣并发症明显较少,术后第七天的引流量也较低(平均 17.2 毫升):闭合切口负压伤口疗法(CI-NPWT)有望降低接受骶骨压疮局部皮瓣重建术的老年患者的伤口开裂率和感染率。不过,还需要进一步开展更大规模的随机研究,以确认其作为传统术后护理替代方案的有效性:该研究已在首尔市政府-首尔国立大学博罗前医疗中心机构审查委员会进行了回顾性注册(编号:20-2023-25,日期:2023年3月24日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Impact of dementia on post-hip fracture walking ability: a stratified analysis based on pre-fracture mobility in Swedish cohorts of older adults. Quality of life and associated characteristics in long-term care residents with advanced dementia in Macao: a cross-sectional study. Home physical therapy versus telerehabilitation in improving motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1