A narrative review on the performance and outcomes of penile and scrotal surgery in the ambulatory setting.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001243
Jainik Shah, Maximilian G Fidel, Ahmed Mousa Almuhanna, Dhiraj S Bal, Premal Patel
{"title":"A narrative review on the performance and outcomes of penile and scrotal surgery in the ambulatory setting.","authors":"Jainik Shah, Maximilian G Fidel, Ahmed Mousa Almuhanna, Dhiraj S Bal, Premal Patel","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Following the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical wait times have surged, creating a backlog in elective urological procedures. This review aims to address the need to explore ambulatory care for penile and scrotal surgeries, which can offer benefits by shifting these procedures away from traditional inpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies confirm the safety and efficacy of performing penile and scrotal procedures in an ambulatory setting using local anesthesia (LA) or loco-sedative techniques. Of 616 reviewed cases, over 90% of patients expressed high satisfaction with LA and reported minimal postoperative complications. Pain management advancements, particularly the use of liposomal bupivacaine, reduced the need for opioids postoperatively. Importantly, no intraoperative complications or hospital admissions were reported, and adverse events were managed conservatively. The data highlighted in this review supports a move towards outpatient surgeries as a safe alternative to inpatient care for select cases.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review highlights the strong potential for ambulatory urological surgeries to alleviate surgical backlogs significantly, while reducing strain on hospital resources, and maintaining high levels of patient satisfaction. As evidence continues to grow on the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of LA in office-based procedures, expanding ambulatory urological will be quintessential in modernizing patient care and reducing healthcare burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"142-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Following the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical wait times have surged, creating a backlog in elective urological procedures. This review aims to address the need to explore ambulatory care for penile and scrotal surgeries, which can offer benefits by shifting these procedures away from traditional inpatient settings.

Recent findings: Recent studies confirm the safety and efficacy of performing penile and scrotal procedures in an ambulatory setting using local anesthesia (LA) or loco-sedative techniques. Of 616 reviewed cases, over 90% of patients expressed high satisfaction with LA and reported minimal postoperative complications. Pain management advancements, particularly the use of liposomal bupivacaine, reduced the need for opioids postoperatively. Importantly, no intraoperative complications or hospital admissions were reported, and adverse events were managed conservatively. The data highlighted in this review supports a move towards outpatient surgeries as a safe alternative to inpatient care for select cases.

Summary: This review highlights the strong potential for ambulatory urological surgeries to alleviate surgical backlogs significantly, while reducing strain on hospital resources, and maintaining high levels of patient satisfaction. As evidence continues to grow on the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of LA in office-based procedures, expanding ambulatory urological will be quintessential in modernizing patient care and reducing healthcare burdens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于门诊环境下阴茎和阴囊手术的表现和结果的叙述性综述。
审查目的:COVID-19 大流行后,手术等待时间激增,造成了泌尿外科择期手术的积压。本综述旨在探讨非住院治疗阴茎和阴囊手术的必要性,因为非住院治疗可将这些手术从传统的住院环境中转移出来,从而带来益处:最近的研究证实,在非住院环境下使用局部麻醉(LA)或局部镇静技术进行阴茎和阴囊手术既安全又有效。在616个回顾病例中,90%以上的患者对LA表示高度满意,并称术后并发症极少。疼痛管理的进步,尤其是脂质体布比卡因的使用,减少了术后对阿片类药物的需求。重要的是,没有术中并发症或住院的报告,不良事件也得到了保守处理。本综述强调的数据支持将门诊手术作为特定病例住院治疗的安全替代方案。摘要:本综述强调了门诊泌尿外科手术的巨大潜力,可显著缓解手术积压,同时减少医院资源的压力,并保持较高的患者满意度。随着越来越多的证据表明LA在诊室手术中的安全性、可行性和有效性,扩大非卧床泌尿外科将是实现病人护理现代化和减轻医疗负担的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Medical therapy for male infertility. A narrative review on the performance and outcomes of penile and scrotal surgery in the ambulatory setting. The role of MRI in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an update from the last two years. Prostatectomy and other local treatments for oligometastatic prostate cancer: recent and ongoing trials. The changing landscape of nonobstructive azoospermia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1