Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4
Hong Tao, Fang Yu, Li Yang, Xiaozhu Pei, Saiping Mao, Xing Fan
{"title":"Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population.","authors":"Hong Tao, Fang Yu, Li Yang, Xiaozhu Pei, Saiping Mao, Xing Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1<sup>m</sup>) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPC<sup>m</sup>), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance.

Methods: A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPCm), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1m and GYPCm in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1m and GYPCm were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1m and GYPCm for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1m and GYPCm for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1m and GYPCm resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results.

Conclusions: PAX1m and GYPCm demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较脱氧核糖核酸甲基化分析和细胞学检测妇科门诊患者中人类乳头瘤病毒阳性高危妇女宫颈癌(前)的性能。
背景:在中国,高危人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)初筛和对非16/18 hrHPV阳性妇女进行细胞学分流已成为流行趋势。然而,细胞学检查依赖于病理学家的主观判断,导致临床表现不一致:方法:本横断面研究共纳入 657 名 hrHPV 阳性女性,年龄在 25-64 岁之间。所有参与者都在细胞学分流后接受了阴道镜活检,细胞学残留标本接受了 DNA 甲基化检测。比较了不同分流策略对 CIN2+ 和 CIN3+ 的敏感性和特异性(n=487):结果显示:PAX1甲基化(PAX1m)、糖蛋白C甲基化(GYPCm)、细胞学以及它们之间的组合或与HPV16/18的组合之间的敏感性和特异性进行了比较:PAX1m和GYPCm检测CIN2或更差(CIN2+)的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.867(95%置信区间[CI]:0.796-0.937)和0.873(95%置信区间:0.808-0.938)。PAX1m 和 GYPCm 对 CIN2+ 和 CIN3+ 检测的敏感性与细胞学检测一致。与细胞学相比,PAX1m 和 GYPCm 检测 CIN2+ 的相对特异性分别为 2.83(95% CI:2.33-2.45)和 3.09(95% CI:2.40-3.98)。与细胞学相比,HPV 16/18与PAX1m和GYPCm联合检测CIN2+的相对特异性分别为3.38(95% CI:2.96-3.86)和3.67(95% CI:3.15-4.27)。与低水平的DNA甲基化相比,高水平的PAX1m和GYPCm导致CIN3+的奇数比(ORs)分别为57.66(95% CI:13.57-409.12,p <0.001)和23.87(95% CI:6.49-115.42,p <0.001),并根据HPV 16/18和细胞学结果进行了调整:PAX1m和GYPCm在识别宫颈癌前病变和宫颈癌方面表现出卓越的能力,AUC值均超过0.85。对于检测hrHPV阳性妇女的CIN2+/CIN3+,DNA甲基化(结合HPV 16/18)比细胞学(结合HPV 16/18)显示出更高的特异性,是检测宫颈(癌前)病变的潜在分子生物标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Cerebrospinal fluid IL-6 and IL-10 as promising diagnostic and therapeutic prognostic biomarkers for secondary central nervous system lymphoma. Prospective study on the association between 36 human blood cell traits and pan-cancer outcomes: a mendelian randomization analysis. Relevant factors for policy concerning comprehensive genomic profiling in oncology: stakeholder perspectives. Roles of the lncRNAs MEG3, PVT1 and H19 tagSNPs in gastric cancer susceptibility. The complexity of needs and roles of family members during breast cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1