[General dental practitioners' and dental hygienists' perspectives on the guideline for periodontal screening, diagnostics, and treatment in general practice].

J C L den Boer, B A F M van Dam, G A van der Weijden, J J M Bruers
{"title":"[General dental practitioners' and dental hygienists' perspectives on the guideline for periodontal screening, diagnostics, and treatment in general practice].","authors":"J C L den Boer, B A F M van Dam, G A van der Weijden, J J M Bruers","doi":"10.5177/ntvt.2024.11.24054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In January 2021, the guideline 'Periodontal screening, diagnosis, and treatment in general practice' was introduced as a successor to the so-called paro protocol. Simultaneously, the Dutch Periodontal Screening Index was replaced by the Periodic Periodontal Screening. The experiences of general dental practitioners and dental hygienists with the new guideline were evaluated in the autumn of 2022. Random groups of 1,000 general dental practitioners and 400 dental hygienists were invited to answer an online questionnaire on this topic: 125 (12.5%) general dental practitioners and 102 (25.5%) dental hygienists responded. By the end of 2022, a large majority of both groups were using the Periodic Periodontal Screening. Both professional groups were satisfied with the new guideline. Dental hygienists used the Periodic Periodontal Screening in more cases than general dental practitioners and were also more frequently satisfied with the new guideline. Both oral healthcare professionals believed that the Periodic Periodontal Screening offers better opportunities to involve the patient in periodontal care compared to the Dutch Periodontal Screening Index.</p>","PeriodicalId":74255,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","volume":"131 11","pages":"493-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2024.11.24054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In January 2021, the guideline 'Periodontal screening, diagnosis, and treatment in general practice' was introduced as a successor to the so-called paro protocol. Simultaneously, the Dutch Periodontal Screening Index was replaced by the Periodic Periodontal Screening. The experiences of general dental practitioners and dental hygienists with the new guideline were evaluated in the autumn of 2022. Random groups of 1,000 general dental practitioners and 400 dental hygienists were invited to answer an online questionnaire on this topic: 125 (12.5%) general dental practitioners and 102 (25.5%) dental hygienists responded. By the end of 2022, a large majority of both groups were using the Periodic Periodontal Screening. Both professional groups were satisfied with the new guideline. Dental hygienists used the Periodic Periodontal Screening in more cases than general dental practitioners and were also more frequently satisfied with the new guideline. Both oral healthcare professionals believed that the Periodic Periodontal Screening offers better opportunities to involve the patient in periodontal care compared to the Dutch Periodontal Screening Index.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[全科牙医和牙科保健师对全科牙周筛查、诊断和治疗指南的看法]。
2021 年 1 月,"全科牙周筛查、诊断和治疗 "指南作为所谓的 paro 协议的继承者被引入。与此同时,荷兰牙周筛查指数也被定期牙周筛查所取代。2022 年秋季,对全科牙医和牙科保健师使用新指南的经验进行了评估。随机邀请了 1000 名全科牙医和 400 名牙科保健师回答有关该主题的在线问卷:125名(12.5%)全科牙科医生和102名(25.5%)牙科卫生学家作了回答。到 2022 年底,这两个群体中的绝大多数人都在使用定期牙周筛查。两个专业群体都对新指南表示满意。牙科保健师使用牙周定期筛查的案例多于普通牙科医生,对新指南的满意度也更高。与荷兰牙周筛查指数相比,两位口腔医疗保健专业人员都认为定期牙周筛查为患者参与牙周护理提供了更好的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[A PhD completed. Issues related to indication, surgery, and outcome of maxillomandibular advancement in obstructive sleep apnea]. [Distal surface caries in the mandibular second molar in the presence of a partially erupted/impacted third molar]. [General dental practitioners' and dental hygienists' perspectives on the guideline for periodontal screening, diagnostics, and treatment in general practice]. [Multidisciplinary treatment of orofacial pain and dysfunction after a transoral condylectomy: the role of pain, sleep, and psychotrauma]. [White lesions of the buccal mucosa: think outside the box, too].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1