Efficacy of Topical Finasteride 0.25% With Minoxidil 5% Versus Topical Minoxidil 5% Alone in Treatment of Male Pattern Androgenic Alopecia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Drugs in Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.36849/JDD.7826
Nazia Asad, Maria Naseer, Rabia Ghafoor
{"title":"Efficacy of Topical Finasteride 0.25% With Minoxidil 5% Versus Topical Minoxidil 5% Alone in Treatment of Male Pattern Androgenic Alopecia.","authors":"Nazia Asad, Maria Naseer, Rabia Ghafoor","doi":"10.36849/JDD.7826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Androgenetic Alopecia (AGA) (male pattern hair loss) is the most common form of alopecia in men, affecting 30% of men by the age of 30 years and 50% by the age of 50 years.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of topical finasteride 0.25% with minoxidil 5% versus topical minoxidil 5% alone in the treatment of male pattern androgenic alopecia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 164 male patients aged between 30 and 60 years, presenting with androgenic alopecia of more than 2 months duration, were included in this single-blind study conducted at the Department of Dermatology, JPMC, Karachi. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (topical finasteride 0.25% with minoxidil 5%) and Group B (topical minoxidil 5% alone). Patients were followed up for 12 weeks, and hair regrowth was assessed at each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age in Group A was 33.99&plusmn;5.97 years, and in Group B, it was 33.91&plusmn;5.71 years. At baseline, the mean salt score was 1.8&plusmn;0.7 in both groups. The efficacy of the treatment was significantly higher in Group A (86.7%) compared to Group B (69.1%; P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of topical finasteride 0.25% with minoxidil 5% provides superior efficacy in the treatment of male pattern androgenic alopecia compared to topical minoxidil 5% alone. These findings support the use of this combination therapy as a potential treatment option for patients with androgenic alopecia. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(11):1003-1008. doi:10.36849/JDD.7826.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":"23 11","pages":"1003-1008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.7826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Androgenetic Alopecia (AGA) (male pattern hair loss) is the most common form of alopecia in men, affecting 30% of men by the age of 30 years and 50% by the age of 50 years.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of topical finasteride 0.25% with minoxidil 5% versus topical minoxidil 5% alone in the treatment of male pattern androgenic alopecia.

Methods: A total of 164 male patients aged between 30 and 60 years, presenting with androgenic alopecia of more than 2 months duration, were included in this single-blind study conducted at the Department of Dermatology, JPMC, Karachi. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (topical finasteride 0.25% with minoxidil 5%) and Group B (topical minoxidil 5% alone). Patients were followed up for 12 weeks, and hair regrowth was assessed at each visit.

Results: The mean age in Group A was 33.99±5.97 years, and in Group B, it was 33.91±5.71 years. At baseline, the mean salt score was 1.8±0.7 in both groups. The efficacy of the treatment was significantly higher in Group A (86.7%) compared to Group B (69.1%; P=0.006).

Conclusion: The combination of topical finasteride 0.25% with minoxidil 5% provides superior efficacy in the treatment of male pattern androgenic alopecia compared to topical minoxidil 5% alone. These findings support the use of this combination therapy as a potential treatment option for patients with androgenic alopecia. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(11):1003-1008. doi:10.36849/JDD.7826.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外用非那雄胺 0.25%与外用米诺地尔 5%治疗男性雄激素性脱发的疗效对比。
背景:雄激素性脱发(AGA)(男性型脱发)是男性最常见的脱发形式,30%的男性在30岁前发病,50%的男性在50岁前发病:比较非那雄胺 0.25% 与米诺地尔 5%局部外用与单用米诺地尔 5%局部外用治疗男性雄激素性脱发的疗效:卡拉奇 JPMC 皮肤科开展的这项单盲研究共纳入了 164 名年龄在 30 至 60 岁之间、病程超过 2 个月的雄激素性脱发男性患者。患者被随机分为两组:A 组(外用非那雄胺 0.25%,米诺地尔 5%)和 B 组(仅外用米诺地尔 5%)。对患者进行为期 12 周的随访,并在每次随访时对毛发生长情况进行评估:A组患者的平均年龄为33.99+5.97岁,B组患者的平均年龄为33.91+5.71岁。基线时,两组的平均盐分均为 1.8±0.7。A组的疗效(86.7%)明显高于B组(69.1%;P=0.006):结论:非那雄胺 0.25% 与米诺地尔 5%联合外用治疗男性雄激素性脱发的疗效优于单独外用米诺地尔 5%。这些研究结果支持将这种联合疗法作为雄激素性脱发患者的一种潜在治疗选择。J Drugs Dermatol.2024;23(11):1003-1008. doi:10.36849/JDD.7826.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology. We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality. Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Topical Finasteride 0.25% With Minoxidil 5% Versus Topical Minoxidil 5% Alone in Treatment of Male Pattern Androgenic Alopecia. From CO2 to Er:YAG: A Comprehensive Review of Laser Treatments for Rhinophyma. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Dermatologist: Uses and Considerations. INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: All for One and One for All: The Three Musketeers of Topical Acne Treatment and the Current Landscape. A Review of Energy-Based Device Interventions to Treat Keloid Scars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1