Behaviorally Informed Text Message Nudges to Schedule COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09170-2
Ashok Reddy, John Geyer, Chelle Wheat, Linnaea Schuttner, Anders Chen, Stephanie Deeds, Joshua M Liao, Nidhi Agrawal, Karin M Nelson
{"title":"Behaviorally Informed Text Message Nudges to Schedule COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ashok Reddy, John Geyer, Chelle Wheat, Linnaea Schuttner, Anders Chen, Stephanie Deeds, Joshua M Liao, Nidhi Agrawal, Karin M Nelson","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09170-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy, especially related to COVID-19 vaccinations among Veterans, may limit uptake. Behaviorally informed text-based messages have the potential to improve uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of two different behaviorally informed text message nudges on COVID-19 vaccine scheduling and completion, compared to standard control message.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, three-arm patient-level randomized quality improvement trial.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Between March and May 2021, 20,523 Veterans were eligible for the initial series of COVID-19 vaccination, enrolled at two large Veterans Health Administration sites.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Arm 1 (Control): standard scheduling message; Arm 2 (Social Good): standard message plus behaviorally informed text message \"When you get a vaccine now, you help protect yourself, your family, and your community\"; and Arm 3 (Scarcity): standard plus behaviorally informed text message \"Only a limited number of vaccine appointments are available.\"</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Outcomes were vaccine scheduling and/or completion rate within 7 days of receipt of text message (primary), and within 14 days and 30 days after receipt of text message (secondary).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Veterans had an overall rate of 19% of scheduling or receiving a vaccination in 7 days. In our adjusted intention-to-treat analysis, we found no difference between intervention social good or scarcity (aOR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.88-1.09, for both arms) compared to standard scheduling message. We found no statistical differences in our secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the initial phases of vaccine roll-out, two behaviorally informed text messages did not increase COVID-19 vaccination rates among Veterans compared to a standard scheduling message.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09170-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaccine hesitancy, especially related to COVID-19 vaccinations among Veterans, may limit uptake. Behaviorally informed text-based messages have the potential to improve uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of two different behaviorally informed text message nudges on COVID-19 vaccine scheduling and completion, compared to standard control message.

Design: Prospective, three-arm patient-level randomized quality improvement trial.

Participants: Between March and May 2021, 20,523 Veterans were eligible for the initial series of COVID-19 vaccination, enrolled at two large Veterans Health Administration sites.

Intervention: Arm 1 (Control): standard scheduling message; Arm 2 (Social Good): standard message plus behaviorally informed text message "When you get a vaccine now, you help protect yourself, your family, and your community"; and Arm 3 (Scarcity): standard plus behaviorally informed text message "Only a limited number of vaccine appointments are available."

Main measures: Outcomes were vaccine scheduling and/or completion rate within 7 days of receipt of text message (primary), and within 14 days and 30 days after receipt of text message (secondary).

Key results: Veterans had an overall rate of 19% of scheduling or receiving a vaccination in 7 days. In our adjusted intention-to-treat analysis, we found no difference between intervention social good or scarcity (aOR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.88-1.09, for both arms) compared to standard scheduling message. We found no statistical differences in our secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: During the initial phases of vaccine roll-out, two behaviorally informed text messages did not increase COVID-19 vaccination rates among Veterans compared to a standard scheduling message.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为信息短信提示安排 COVID-19 疫苗接种:随机对照试验。
背景:疫苗接种犹豫不决,尤其是退伍军人中的 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫不决,可能会限制疫苗的接种率。基于行为信息的短信有可能提高 COVID-19 疫苗的接种率:与标准对照信息相比,评估两种不同的行为信息提示对 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划和完成率的影响:设计:前瞻性三臂患者级随机质量改进试验:在 2021 年 3 月至 5 月期间,20523 名退伍军人符合接种 COVID-19 疫苗初始系列的条件,他们在退伍军人健康管理局的两个大型站点注册:干预措施:第 1 组(对照组):标准安排信息;第 2 组(社会公益组):标准信息加行为信息短信 "现在接种疫苗,有助于保护您自己、您的家人和您的社区";第 3 组(稀缺组):标准信息加行为信息短信 "仅提供数量有限的疫苗预约":结果为收到短信后 7 天内的疫苗预约率和/或完成率(主要结果),以及收到短信后 14 天和 30 天内的疫苗预约率和/或完成率(次要结果):退伍军人在 7 天内安排或接受疫苗接种的总比例为 19%。在调整后的意向治疗分析中,我们发现与标准日程安排短信相比,干预的社会公益性或稀缺性没有差异(两组的 aOR 均为 0.98,95% CI 均为 0.88-1.09)。我们在次要结果中也没有发现统计学差异:结论:在疫苗推广的最初阶段,与标准日程安排短信相比,两条行为信息短信并没有提高退伍军人的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study. Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis. The Master Adaptive Clinician Educator: A Framework for Future Educational Leaders in Academic Medicine. Empagliflozin in Diuretic-Refractory Ascites (DRAin-Em): Results of a Single-Center Feasibility Study. Effectiveness of a Novel Global Telemedicine Curriculum for Medical Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1