Margaret Swarbrick, Angelo Di Bello, SunHee Jang Eissenstat, Patricia B Nemec, Denise Aimee Hien, Kenneth J Gill
{"title":"Factor Structure, Reliability, and Construct Validity of the Wellness Inventory.","authors":"Margaret Swarbrick, Angelo Di Bello, SunHee Jang Eissenstat, Patricia B Nemec, Denise Aimee Hien, Kenneth J Gill","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Wellness has been associated with various general medical and mental health outcomes; however, few empirically supported measures capture the breadth of the wellness construct. The first author had previously developed the Wellness Inventory through an iterative process with key stakeholders to establish face and content validity and examined the psychometric properties of the Wellness Inventory as a tool for assessing wellness across eight dimensions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors assessed the Wellness Inventory by using data from self-report online surveys in three samples of data collected from two groups of respondents: students and faculty members in a public university and behavioral health providers (N=3,446; 50% White and 43% female). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and data from samples 1 and 2 were used to examine the factor structure and fit of the inventory. Data from sample 3 were used to assess test-retest reliability and convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analyses yielded a one-factor model comprising 54 items. A revised instrument based on this model revealed good fit to the data, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability and reasonable construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Wellness Inventory is a comprehensive and psychometrically valid tool for assessing wellness. The findings support a single dimension of wellness, suggesting wellness as a holistic, general construct. This inventory has implications for research on health promotion and prevention and clinical outcomes in both research and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Wellness has been associated with various general medical and mental health outcomes; however, few empirically supported measures capture the breadth of the wellness construct. The first author had previously developed the Wellness Inventory through an iterative process with key stakeholders to establish face and content validity and examined the psychometric properties of the Wellness Inventory as a tool for assessing wellness across eight dimensions.
Methods: The authors assessed the Wellness Inventory by using data from self-report online surveys in three samples of data collected from two groups of respondents: students and faculty members in a public university and behavioral health providers (N=3,446; 50% White and 43% female). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and data from samples 1 and 2 were used to examine the factor structure and fit of the inventory. Data from sample 3 were used to assess test-retest reliability and convergent and discriminant validity.
Results: Factor analyses yielded a one-factor model comprising 54 items. A revised instrument based on this model revealed good fit to the data, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability and reasonable construct validity.
Conclusions: The Wellness Inventory is a comprehensive and psychometrically valid tool for assessing wellness. The findings support a single dimension of wellness, suggesting wellness as a holistic, general construct. This inventory has implications for research on health promotion and prevention and clinical outcomes in both research and treatment.
期刊介绍：
Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
