[Long-term Reproducibility Evaluation of Fluoroscopy Dose Rate in Angiography Equipment].

Kazuya Mori, Kouhei Makabe, Ryou Sekiguchi, Toru Negishi, Takuji Tsuchida
{"title":"[Long-term Reproducibility Evaluation of Fluoroscopy Dose Rate in Angiography Equipment].","authors":"Kazuya Mori, Kouhei Makabe, Ryou Sekiguchi, Toru Negishi, Takuji Tsuchida","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are defined as fluoroscopic dose rate measurements that are used for patient dose management in angiography. It is recommended that DRLs be measured at least once a year. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term fluctuations of fluoroscopic dose rate in an angiography system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An unconnected X-ray output analyzer was used to measure the fluoroscopic dose rate (air kerma rate) at the patient's entrance reference point for a specific angiography system. The target period was from 2015 to 2022, and four measurements per year were made. First, the fluoroscopic dose rate was measured, and the average value and standard deviation for the target period were calculated. Next, the uncertainty of the measured values and the coefficient of variation were calculated. Finally, we calculated the fluoroscopic dose rate measurement error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average±standard deviation of the fluoroscopic dose rate was 353.29±9.11 µGy/s. The maximum uncertainty and coefficient of variation for each year were 5.41 µGy/s and 0.03, respectively. The maximum measurement error was 4.67%, where the mean measured value was taken as the true value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fluctuation in the measured value of the fluoroscopic dose rate by an angiography system for 8 years is within ±5%, indicating stable X-ray output.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are defined as fluoroscopic dose rate measurements that are used for patient dose management in angiography. It is recommended that DRLs be measured at least once a year. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term fluctuations of fluoroscopic dose rate in an angiography system.

Methods: An unconnected X-ray output analyzer was used to measure the fluoroscopic dose rate (air kerma rate) at the patient's entrance reference point for a specific angiography system. The target period was from 2015 to 2022, and four measurements per year were made. First, the fluoroscopic dose rate was measured, and the average value and standard deviation for the target period were calculated. Next, the uncertainty of the measured values and the coefficient of variation were calculated. Finally, we calculated the fluoroscopic dose rate measurement error.

Results: The average±standard deviation of the fluoroscopic dose rate was 353.29±9.11 µGy/s. The maximum uncertainty and coefficient of variation for each year were 5.41 µGy/s and 0.03, respectively. The maximum measurement error was 4.67%, where the mean measured value was taken as the true value.

Conclusion: The fluctuation in the measured value of the fluoroscopic dose rate by an angiography system for 8 years is within ±5%, indicating stable X-ray output.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[血管造影设备透视剂量率的长期可重复性评估]。
目的:诊断参考水平 (DRL) 是指用于血管造影术患者剂量管理的透视剂量率测量值。建议至少每年测量一次 DRL。本研究旨在评估血管造影系统中透视剂量率的长期波动:方法:使用未连接的 X 射线输出分析仪测量特定血管造影系统在患者入口参考点处的透视剂量率(空气开玛率)。目标时间段为 2015 年至 2022 年,每年进行四次测量。首先,测量透视剂量率,并计算目标期间的平均值和标准偏差。然后,计算测量值的不确定性和变异系数。最后,我们计算了透视剂量率测量误差:结果:透视剂量率的平均值(标准偏差)为 353.29±9.11 µGy/s。每年的最大不确定性和变异系数分别为 5.41 µGy/s 和 0.03。最大测量误差为 4.67%,测量值的平均值被视为真实值:结论:血管造影系统 8 年来的透视剂量率测量值波动在 ±5% 以内,表明 X 射线输出稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Long-term Reproducibility Evaluation of Fluoroscopy Dose Rate in Angiography Equipment]. [Root Cause Analysis for Incident Reporting Cases of Radiological Technologists Based on Years of Experience]. [Effect of Training Data Differences on Accuracy in MR Image Generation Using Pix2pix]. [Noise Characteristics of Summary Maps for Brain CT Perfusion: A Simulation Study Using a Digital Phantom and Clinical Images]. [Effect of Pulse Wave Synchronization on T1 Value in Cardiac T1 Mapping: Is Pulse Wave Synchronization a Substitute for Electrocardiogram Gating?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1