Assessing Facility Readiness to Provide Equitable Birthing Care in New York State: A Baseline Survey.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Management and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000001997
Sahar Gowani, Jacqueline Kellachan, Chiagbanwe Enwere, Marilyn Kacica
{"title":"Assessing Facility Readiness to Provide Equitable Birthing Care in New York State: A Baseline Survey.","authors":"Sahar Gowani, Jacqueline Kellachan, Chiagbanwe Enwere, Marilyn Kacica","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Facility policies, practices, and culture contribute to inequities in maternal outcomes. In New York State (NYS), Black birthing people are 4 to 5 times more likely to experience maternal mortality than White birthing people.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understanding the racial, ethnic, linguistic, and gender equity policies at NYS birthing facilities can identify areas of improvement to impact care and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The design was a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The setting was NYS birthing facilities, which included hospitals and birthing centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Facility leadership completed self-reported surveys from December 2020 through June 2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Facility equity data were obtained across 4 domains: (1) organizational commitment to equity, (2) staff equity training and evaluation, (3) leadership and staff composition, and (4) patient data, voice, and influence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over half of NYS birthing facilities documented a public commitment to equity in their mission, but only 15% had a written equity plan with processes for monitoring progress. Less than one-third of facilities stated that staff from underrepresented racial, ethnic, and language, gender (REaLG) groups were proportionally represented in leadership and management positions. About half of the facilities reported their staff composition reflects their patient population, but only a quarter analyzed staff REaLG demographics to serve diverse patients. Twenty-eight percent of facilities assess diversity in their board of directors, facility leadership, medical leadership, medical staff, and administrative staff. One-third required staff implicit bias training; 17% collected and used data on patient satisfaction regarding racial equity; and 12% engaged affected communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facilities differed in their implementation of policies and practices that support equitable care. Survey data provide facilities with specific areas of improvement to focus their efforts. Equity assessments are an important step for facilities to evaluate their policies and practices and for statewide institutions to develop programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Facility policies, practices, and culture contribute to inequities in maternal outcomes. In New York State (NYS), Black birthing people are 4 to 5 times more likely to experience maternal mortality than White birthing people.

Objectives: Understanding the racial, ethnic, linguistic, and gender equity policies at NYS birthing facilities can identify areas of improvement to impact care and outcomes.

Design: The design was a cross-sectional study.

Setting: The setting was NYS birthing facilities, which included hospitals and birthing centers.

Participants: Facility leadership completed self-reported surveys from December 2020 through June 2021.

Main outcome measure: Facility equity data were obtained across 4 domains: (1) organizational commitment to equity, (2) staff equity training and evaluation, (3) leadership and staff composition, and (4) patient data, voice, and influence.

Results: Over half of NYS birthing facilities documented a public commitment to equity in their mission, but only 15% had a written equity plan with processes for monitoring progress. Less than one-third of facilities stated that staff from underrepresented racial, ethnic, and language, gender (REaLG) groups were proportionally represented in leadership and management positions. About half of the facilities reported their staff composition reflects their patient population, but only a quarter analyzed staff REaLG demographics to serve diverse patients. Twenty-eight percent of facilities assess diversity in their board of directors, facility leadership, medical leadership, medical staff, and administrative staff. One-third required staff implicit bias training; 17% collected and used data on patient satisfaction regarding racial equity; and 12% engaged affected communities.

Conclusions: Facilities differed in their implementation of policies and practices that support equitable care. Survey data provide facilities with specific areas of improvement to focus their efforts. Equity assessments are an important step for facilities to evaluate their policies and practices and for statewide institutions to develop programming.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估纽约州医疗机构提供公平分娩护理的准备情况:基线调查。
背景:医疗机构的政策、实践和文化造成了孕产妇结果的不平等。在纽约州(NYS),黑人分娩者的孕产妇死亡率是白人分娩者的 4 到 5 倍:目的:了解纽约州分娩机构的种族、民族、语言和性别平等政策,可以确定需要改进的领域,从而对护理和结果产生影响:设计:设计为横断面研究:环境:环境为纽约州的分娩设施,包括医院和分娩中心:主要结果测量:主要结果测量:从以下 4 个领域获取设施公平数据:(1)组织对公平的承诺;(2)员工公平培训和评估;(3)领导层和员工组成;以及(4)患者数据、发言权和影响力:超过一半的纽约州分娩机构在其使命中记录了对公平的公开承诺,但只有 15%的机构制定了书面的公平计划,并有监督进展的流程。不到三分之一的医疗机构表示,来自代表人数不足的种族、民族、语言和性别(REaLG)群体的员工在领导和管理职位上占有一定比例。约有一半的医疗机构报告说,他们的员工构成反映了病人群体的情况,但只有四分之一的医疗机构分析了员工 REaLG 人口统计数据,以便为不同的病人提供服务。28% 的机构对董事会、机构领导层、医疗领导层、医务人员和行政人员的多样性进行了评估。三分之一的机构要求员工接受隐性偏见培训;17%的机构收集并使用了患者对种族公平满意度的数据;12%的机构让受影响的社区参与进来:各医疗机构在实施支持公平医疗的政策和实践方面存在差异。调查数据为医疗机构提供了需要改进的具体领域,以便他们集中精力加以改进。公平评估是医疗机构评估其政策和实践的重要步骤,也是全州医疗机构制定计划的重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Criticality and Frequency of Tasks by the Public Health Workforce, 2022. Real-Time Dashboard for Identifying Overdose Touchpoints in Indiana. Assessing Facility Readiness to Provide Equitable Birthing Care in New York State: A Baseline Survey. Training the Next Generation of Local Public Health Leaders: A Case Study of Community Health Organizers in Pennsylvania. Maintaining and Improving Virtual Call Centers for Public Health: The CUNY Recovery Corps Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1