Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Ureteral Frozen Section Analysis During Radical Cystectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2024-11-03 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.72908
Saleh Al-Gburi, Magi Williams, Ketan Agarwal, Thiagarajan Nambirajan
{"title":"Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Ureteral Frozen Section Analysis During Radical Cystectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Saleh Al-Gburi, Magi Williams, Ketan Agarwal, Thiagarajan Nambirajan","doi":"10.7759/cureus.72908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The objective of this study is to find out if there are any differences in upper urinary tract recurrence and overall mortality between patients who underwent a frozen section analysis during radical cystectomy and those who did not. Materials and methods In an observational retrospective cohort study, we evaluated data from 164 patients who underwent radical cystectomy in our institution over a five-year period from 2013 to 2018. Fisher's exact test was applied to find any difference in upper urinary tract recurrence between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to determine differences or equivalence between treatment groups. Results The sensitivity was 84.6% and the specificity was 95.3% for the frozen section. There was no statistically significant relationship between performing a frozen section and upper urinary tract recurrence, as indicated by Fisher's exact test (p=0.619). The Kaplan-Meier test showed no statistically significant relationship between performing a frozen section analysis and overall mortality. Discussion The use of ureteric frozen section analysis during radical cystectomy is traditionally taught during surgical training, but the evidence base for this practice is sketchy. Frozen section analysis is thought to reduce the chances of local recurrence and arguably upper urinary tract recurrence. The overall upper urinary tract recurrence after radical cystectomy is reported to be 2-6%, consistent with the 3.3% observed in our study. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that while frozen section analysis is sensitive and specific in detecting dysplasia, it does not significantly impact upper tract recurrence or overall mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The objective of this study is to find out if there are any differences in upper urinary tract recurrence and overall mortality between patients who underwent a frozen section analysis during radical cystectomy and those who did not. Materials and methods In an observational retrospective cohort study, we evaluated data from 164 patients who underwent radical cystectomy in our institution over a five-year period from 2013 to 2018. Fisher's exact test was applied to find any difference in upper urinary tract recurrence between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to determine differences or equivalence between treatment groups. Results The sensitivity was 84.6% and the specificity was 95.3% for the frozen section. There was no statistically significant relationship between performing a frozen section and upper urinary tract recurrence, as indicated by Fisher's exact test (p=0.619). The Kaplan-Meier test showed no statistically significant relationship between performing a frozen section analysis and overall mortality. Discussion The use of ureteric frozen section analysis during radical cystectomy is traditionally taught during surgical training, but the evidence base for this practice is sketchy. Frozen section analysis is thought to reduce the chances of local recurrence and arguably upper urinary tract recurrence. The overall upper urinary tract recurrence after radical cystectomy is reported to be 2-6%, consistent with the 3.3% observed in our study. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that while frozen section analysis is sensitive and specific in detecting dysplasia, it does not significantly impact upper tract recurrence or overall mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估根治性膀胱切除术中输尿管冷冻切片分析的临床影响:单中心回顾性研究
引言 本研究旨在了解在根治性膀胱切除术中接受冰冻切片分析的患者与未接受冰冻切片分析的患者在上尿路复发率和总死亡率方面是否存在差异。材料和方法 在一项观察性回顾性队列研究中,我们评估了从 2013 年到 2018 年五年间在我院接受根治性膀胱切除术的 164 名患者的数据。采用费雪精确检验来发现两组患者上尿路复发率的差异。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和对数秩(Mantel-Cox)检验来确定治疗组之间的差异或等效性。结果 冷冻切片的敏感性为 84.6%,特异性为 95.3%。费舍尔精确检验(P=0.619)表明,进行冰冻切片与上尿路复发之间没有统计学意义上的显著关系。Kaplan-Meier 检验显示,进行冰冻切片分析与总死亡率之间没有统计学意义。讨论 根治性膀胱切除术中使用输尿管冰冻切片分析是外科培训的传统教学内容,但这种做法的证据基础并不充分。冷冻切片分析被认为可以降低局部复发的几率,也可以说降低了上尿路复发的几率。据报道,根治性膀胱切除术后上尿路总复发率为 2-6%,与我们研究中观察到的 3.3% 相一致。结论 我们的研究表明,虽然冰冻切片分析在检测发育不良方面具有敏感性和特异性,但对上尿路复发或总死亡率并无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Current Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Detection of Its Complications: A Systematic Review. Assessment of Optimal Treatment Strategies and Their Outcomes in T3N1 Rectal Cancers. Effective Pain Management of Postherpetic Neuralgia Using a Combination of Analgesics and Conservative Measures. Evaluation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Exacerbation of Hyperbilirubinemia by Falciparum Malaria in a Patient With Coexisting Gilbert's Syndrome and Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1