Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add-on the rapyin persistent postural-perceptual dizziness

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES IBRO Neuroscience Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.10.005
Yao Jia , Hongbin Wang , Dan Li , Xingli Wu , Jiawen Yang , Weifei Min , Ting Ma , He Huang , Rui Li
{"title":"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add-on the rapyin persistent postural-perceptual dizziness","authors":"Yao Jia ,&nbsp;Hongbin Wang ,&nbsp;Dan Li ,&nbsp;Xingli Wu ,&nbsp;Jiawen Yang ,&nbsp;Weifei Min ,&nbsp;Ting Ma ,&nbsp;He Huang ,&nbsp;Rui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) when used as an add-on therapy for individuals with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized controlled, double-blind trial conducted at Shangluo Central Hospital, patients with PPPD diagnosed in the neurology departments were included. Participants were randomized into a rTMS treatment group and a control group in a 1:1 ratio by the randomized grouping method. Patients in both groups received conventional treatment, with the rTMS treatment group underwent daily rTMS sessions, whereas the control group received sham rTMS treatments following the same schedule. The effectiveness of the treatments was primarily assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), which measured symptoms of vertigo, anxiety, and depression at baseline, after two weeks, and at the end of four weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of the 46 participants recruited, 2 were excluded due to contraindications, 22 were randomly assigned to the rTMS treatment group, and 22 were assigned to the control group. Ultimately, 2 withdrew for personal reasons, and data from 42 participants were included in the outcome analysis. HAMA, HAMD and DHI scores were significantly lower in the rTMS treatment group than in the control group after 4 weeks of treatment (p&lt;0.05). A positive correlation was also observed between DHI scores and HAMA or HAMD scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pilot study demonstrated that rTMS is a beneficial add-on therapy for patients with PPPD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13195,"journal":{"name":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Pages 382-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) when used as an add-on therapy for individuals with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD).

Methods

In this randomized controlled, double-blind trial conducted at Shangluo Central Hospital, patients with PPPD diagnosed in the neurology departments were included. Participants were randomized into a rTMS treatment group and a control group in a 1:1 ratio by the randomized grouping method. Patients in both groups received conventional treatment, with the rTMS treatment group underwent daily rTMS sessions, whereas the control group received sham rTMS treatments following the same schedule. The effectiveness of the treatments was primarily assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), which measured symptoms of vertigo, anxiety, and depression at baseline, after two weeks, and at the end of four weeks.

Findings

Of the 46 participants recruited, 2 were excluded due to contraindications, 22 were randomly assigned to the rTMS treatment group, and 22 were assigned to the control group. Ultimately, 2 withdrew for personal reasons, and data from 42 participants were included in the outcome analysis. HAMA, HAMD and DHI scores were significantly lower in the rTMS treatment group than in the control group after 4 weeks of treatment (p<0.05). A positive correlation was also observed between DHI scores and HAMA or HAMD scores.

Conclusions

This pilot study demonstrated that rTMS is a beneficial add-on therapy for patients with PPPD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复性经颅磁刺激作为持续性姿势感知性头晕的附加疗法
背景本研究旨在评估重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为持续性姿势知觉性头晕(PPPD)患者的附加疗法的临床疗效。方法在商洛市中心医院进行的这项随机对照双盲试验中,纳入了在神经内科确诊的 PPPD 患者。试验采用随机分组法,将患者按 1:1 的比例随机分为经颅磁刺激治疗组和对照组。两组患者均接受常规治疗,经颅磁刺激治疗组每天接受经颅磁刺激治疗,而对照组则按照相同的时间表接受假经颅磁刺激治疗。治疗效果主要通过眩晕障碍量表(DHI)、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAMA)和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD)进行评估,分别测量基线、两周后和四周结束时的眩晕、焦虑和抑郁症状。最终,2人因个人原因退出,42名参与者的数据被纳入结果分析。治疗 4 周后,经颅磁刺激治疗组的 HAMA、HAMD 和 DHI 评分明显低于对照组(p<0.05)。DHI评分与HAMA或HAMD评分之间也呈正相关。结论这项试验性研究表明,经颅磁刺激疗法是一种有益于PPPD患者的附加疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IBRO Neuroscience Reports
IBRO Neuroscience Reports Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Post-stroke effects of IC87201 on neurobehavioral function and brain injuries: A stereological study Causes and countermeasures for the increased infection and COVID-19 mortality rates in patients with schizophrenia Alterations in Neuroligin-2 and BDNF proteins associated with anxiety-like behavior in salicylate-induced tinnitus rats Understanding the influence of digital technology on human cognitive functions: A narrative review Neonatal maternal separation impairs cognitive function and synaptic plasticity in adult male CD-1 mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1