Equilibrium reinsurance strategies for catastrophe and secondary claims under α-maxmin mean–variance criterion

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103729
{"title":"Equilibrium reinsurance strategies for catastrophe and secondary claims under α-maxmin mean–variance criterion","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates optimal reinsurance under the consideration of contagious catastrophe claims and secondary claims, and the intensity of the latter is modeled as a shot noise process impacted by the former. Also, an <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>-maxmin mean–variance (MV) criterion is adopted to allow the insurer to have different levels of ambiguity aversion attitudes, and the general mean–variance premium principle is applied to calculate the reinsurance premiums. To overcome the time-inconsistency issue in the problem, this paper solves the optimization problem via studying the corresponding Extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (EHJB) equation. With the help of some auxiliary problems, the existence and uniqueness of the optimal reinsurance strategies are demonstrated. Our research indicates that an insurer’s reinsurance strategy for catastrophe claims is influenced by the strategy for secondary claims, but not vice versa. Additionally, it is observed that, for catastrophe insurance businesses, the proportional reinsurance contract is optimal when applying variance premium principle, while the excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty is generally preferred under the expected value premium principle. Finally, the sensitivity analysis for optimal reinsurance strategies with respect to several model parameters are performed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924006616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates optimal reinsurance under the consideration of contagious catastrophe claims and secondary claims, and the intensity of the latter is modeled as a shot noise process impacted by the former. Also, an α-maxmin mean–variance (MV) criterion is adopted to allow the insurer to have different levels of ambiguity aversion attitudes, and the general mean–variance premium principle is applied to calculate the reinsurance premiums. To overcome the time-inconsistency issue in the problem, this paper solves the optimization problem via studying the corresponding Extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (EHJB) equation. With the help of some auxiliary problems, the existence and uniqueness of the optimal reinsurance strategies are demonstrated. Our research indicates that an insurer’s reinsurance strategy for catastrophe claims is influenced by the strategy for secondary claims, but not vice versa. Additionally, it is observed that, for catastrophe insurance businesses, the proportional reinsurance contract is optimal when applying variance premium principle, while the excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty is generally preferred under the expected value premium principle. Finally, the sensitivity analysis for optimal reinsurance strategies with respect to several model parameters are performed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
α-最大均值方差准则下巨灾和二次理赔的均衡再保险策略
本文研究了在考虑传染性巨灾索赔和二次索赔的情况下的最优再保险,并将后者的强度模拟为受前者影响的射频噪声过程。同时,采用α-最大最小均值方差(MV)准则,允许保险人有不同程度的模糊厌恶态度,并应用一般均值方差保费原理计算再保险费。为了克服问题中的时间不一致问题,本文通过研究相应的扩展汉密尔顿-雅各比-贝尔曼(EHJB)方程来解决优化问题。在一些辅助问题的帮助下,证明了最优再保险策略的存在性和唯一性。我们的研究表明,保险公司的巨灾理赔再保险策略受二次理赔策略的影响,反之亦然。此外,我们还发现,对于巨灾保险业务而言,在采用差异溢价原则时,比例再保险合同是最优的,而在预期价值溢价原则下,损失溢额再保险条款通常是首选。最后,对最优再保险策略的几个模型参数进行了敏感性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Sovereign momentum currency returns When the tide wanes: A study of post systemic collapse portfolio management Evaluating the sophisticated digital assets and cryptocurrencies capacities of substituting international currencies in inflationary eras Do regional trusts alleviate bond market risks? Evidence from the Chinese municipal corporate bond pricing The unintended consequence of environmental centralization: Evidence from firm financialization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1