Spatial analysis techniques for assessing groundwater vulnerability: a strategic approach to proactive conservation and mitigation strategies

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-11930-6
Yani Xiong, Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem, Linze Li, Abiodun Yusuff Moshood, Wei Zhang, Yanyan Zhang, Jiandong Hu
{"title":"Spatial analysis techniques for assessing groundwater vulnerability: a strategic approach to proactive conservation and mitigation strategies","authors":"Yani Xiong,&nbsp;Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem,&nbsp;Linze Li,&nbsp;Abiodun Yusuff Moshood,&nbsp;Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Yanyan Zhang,&nbsp;Jiandong Hu","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11930-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Groundwater is a critical resource that supports agriculture and ecosystems which is increasingly threatened by anthropogenic activities and climate change. Despite the advancements in spatial analysis methods, there remains a lack of comprehensive reviews that synthesize these techniques specifically for groundwater vulnerability assessment as existing literature often focuses on isolated methodologies without integrating them into a cohesive framework that addresses the complexities of groundwater systems. Hence, the need for proactive conservation and mitigation strategies on how spatial analysis can enhance groundwater vulnerability assessments is crucial for developing effective policies and practices aimed at safeguarding this vital resource. This review evaluates various spatial analysis techniques used in assessing groundwater vulnerability, identify their strengths and limitations, and propose a strategic framework for their application in conservation efforts. A systematic literature review was conducted, focusing on peer-reviewed articles published in the last two decades. Techniques such as remote sensing (RS), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), and statistical modelling were analyzed in terms of their applicability to groundwater vulnerability assessments. The findings reveal that spatial analysis techniques significantly enhance the accuracy of groundwater vulnerability assessments (GVAs) by incorporating diverse data sources such as land use, soil characteristics, and hydrological features. Key results indicate that GIS-based models provide robust frameworks for identifying vulnerable areas, while MCDA facilitates stakeholder engagement by integrating socio-economic factors into decision-making processes. The study concludes that a strategic approach combining various spatial analysis techniques offers a promising pathway for enhancing groundwater vulnerability assessments. This integrated methodology not only aids in identifying vulnerable areas but also supports informed decision-making processes regarding conservation efforts. However, future research should focus on developing standardized protocols for integrating diverse spatial analysis methods as well as longitudinal studies to assess the long-term effectiveness of implemented conservation strategies based on these assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11930-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater is a critical resource that supports agriculture and ecosystems which is increasingly threatened by anthropogenic activities and climate change. Despite the advancements in spatial analysis methods, there remains a lack of comprehensive reviews that synthesize these techniques specifically for groundwater vulnerability assessment as existing literature often focuses on isolated methodologies without integrating them into a cohesive framework that addresses the complexities of groundwater systems. Hence, the need for proactive conservation and mitigation strategies on how spatial analysis can enhance groundwater vulnerability assessments is crucial for developing effective policies and practices aimed at safeguarding this vital resource. This review evaluates various spatial analysis techniques used in assessing groundwater vulnerability, identify their strengths and limitations, and propose a strategic framework for their application in conservation efforts. A systematic literature review was conducted, focusing on peer-reviewed articles published in the last two decades. Techniques such as remote sensing (RS), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), and statistical modelling were analyzed in terms of their applicability to groundwater vulnerability assessments. The findings reveal that spatial analysis techniques significantly enhance the accuracy of groundwater vulnerability assessments (GVAs) by incorporating diverse data sources such as land use, soil characteristics, and hydrological features. Key results indicate that GIS-based models provide robust frameworks for identifying vulnerable areas, while MCDA facilitates stakeholder engagement by integrating socio-economic factors into decision-making processes. The study concludes that a strategic approach combining various spatial analysis techniques offers a promising pathway for enhancing groundwater vulnerability assessments. This integrated methodology not only aids in identifying vulnerable areas but also supports informed decision-making processes regarding conservation efforts. However, future research should focus on developing standardized protocols for integrating diverse spatial analysis methods as well as longitudinal studies to assess the long-term effectiveness of implemented conservation strategies based on these assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估地下水脆弱性的空间分析技术:积极保护和缓解战略的战略方法
地下水是支持农业和生态系统的重要资源,正日益受到人为活动和气候变化的威胁。尽管空间分析方法不断进步,但仍然缺乏专门针对地下水脆弱性评估综合这些技术的全面综述,因为现有文献往往侧重于孤立的方法,而没有将它们整合到一个有凝聚力的框架中,以解决地下水系统的复杂性。因此,需要就空间分析如何加强地下水脆弱性评估制定积极的保护和缓解战略,这对制定旨在保护这一重要资源的有效政策和实践至关重要。本综述评估了用于评估地下水脆弱性的各种空间分析技术,确定了它们的优势和局限性,并提出了在保护工作中应用这些技术的战略框架。我们进行了系统的文献综述,重点是过去二十年中发表的经同行评审的文章。分析了遥感 (RS)、地理信息系统 (GIS)、多标准决策分析 (MCDA) 和统计建模等技术在地下水脆弱性评估中的适用性。研究结果表明,空间分析技术通过整合土地利用、土壤特性和水文特征等各种数据源,大大提高了地下水脆弱性评估(GVAs)的准确性。主要结果表明,基于地理信息系统的模型为确定脆弱地区提供了强有力的框架,而 MCDA 通过将社会经济因素纳入决策过程,促进了利益相关者的参与。研究得出结论,结合各种空间分析技术的战略方法为加强地下水脆弱性评估提供了一条大有可为的途径。这种综合方法不仅有助于确定脆弱地区,还能支持有关保护工作的知情决策过程。不过,今后的研究应侧重于制定整合各种空间分析方法的标准化规程,以及开展纵向研究,以评估在这些评估基础上实施的保护战略的长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Study on the influence of pipe jacking construction on existing subway tunnels Study on progressive damage and deformation law of coal body around borehole under different moisture states Hydrochemical stratigraphic analysis of the filling of the Meirama open pit mine II: parameters and elements Detection and comprehensive treatment for giant karst caves under the tunnel floor: a case study in Guangxi, China Mineralogical compositions and distributions of trace and rare earth elements in Eocene carbonaceous sediments of Western India: implications for paleoenvironment during peat accumulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1