Adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients: A post hoc analysis of the RESTRIC trial

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Acute Medicine & Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1002/ams2.70016
Makoto Aoki, Kazunori Fukushima, Mineji Hayakawa, Daisuke Kudo, Takashi Tagami, Kiyohiro Oshima, Shigeki Kushimoto
{"title":"Adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients: A post hoc analysis of the RESTRIC trial","authors":"Makoto Aoki,&nbsp;Kazunori Fukushima,&nbsp;Mineji Hayakawa,&nbsp;Daisuke Kudo,&nbsp;Takashi Tagami,&nbsp;Kiyohiro Oshima,&nbsp;Shigeki Kushimoto","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>A balanced transfusion strategy has been a standard resuscitation method for trauma patients, and adherence to a massive transfusion protocol incorporating balanced transfusion is reported to reduce mortality. This study aimed to assess adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients in Japan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study analyzes RESTRIC (restrictive transfusion strategy for critically injured patients) trial patients who were cluster-randomized based on restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy. We defined two transfusion groups: massive transfusion group 1, which includes RBC transfusions of at least eight units within 6 h; and massive transfusion group 2, which includes RBC transfusions of at least 20 units within 24 h. Adherence to balanced transfusion was assessed as the ratios of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to red blood cells (RBC) and platelet concentrate (PC) to RBC ratio &gt;0.5.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 220 eligible patients, 98 (44.5%) were grouped as massive transfusion group 1 and 38 (17.3%) as massive transfusion group 2. The balanced transfusion in terms of the FFP to RBC ratio was nearly 100% for groups 1 and 2 over all periods. However, the balanced transfusion in terms of the PC to RBC ratio within 6 h were 51.0% for group 1 and 68.4% for group 2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed that while the ratio of FFP to RBC was balanced among patients from the early phase, the ratio of PC to RBC was not fully balanced, particularly in the early phase.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

A balanced transfusion strategy has been a standard resuscitation method for trauma patients, and adherence to a massive transfusion protocol incorporating balanced transfusion is reported to reduce mortality. This study aimed to assess adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients in Japan.

Methods

This study analyzes RESTRIC (restrictive transfusion strategy for critically injured patients) trial patients who were cluster-randomized based on restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy. We defined two transfusion groups: massive transfusion group 1, which includes RBC transfusions of at least eight units within 6 h; and massive transfusion group 2, which includes RBC transfusions of at least 20 units within 24 h. Adherence to balanced transfusion was assessed as the ratios of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to red blood cells (RBC) and platelet concentrate (PC) to RBC ratio >0.5.

Results

Among 220 eligible patients, 98 (44.5%) were grouped as massive transfusion group 1 and 38 (17.3%) as massive transfusion group 2. The balanced transfusion in terms of the FFP to RBC ratio was nearly 100% for groups 1 and 2 over all periods. However, the balanced transfusion in terms of the PC to RBC ratio within 6 h were 51.0% for group 1 and 68.4% for group 2.

Conclusion

This study revealed that while the ratio of FFP to RBC was balanced among patients from the early phase, the ratio of PC to RBC was not fully balanced, particularly in the early phase.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重伤患者坚持均衡输血:RESTRIC 试验的事后分析
目的 平衡输血策略一直是创伤患者的标准复苏方法,据报道,遵守包含平衡输血的大规模输血方案可降低死亡率。本研究旨在评估日本重伤患者坚持均衡输血的情况。 方法 本研究分析了 RESTRIC(重伤患者限制性输血策略)试验中根据限制性或自由输血策略分组随机分配的患者。我们定义了两个输血组:大量输血组 1(包括 6 小时内至少输注 8 个单位的红细胞)和大量输血组 2(包括 24 小时内至少输注 20 个单位的红细胞)。评估是否坚持均衡输血的标准是新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)与红细胞(RBC)的比率和浓缩血小板(PC)与红细胞(RBC)的比率>0.5。 结果 220 名符合条件的患者中,98 人(44.5%)被归为大量输血 1 组,38 人(17.3%)被归为大量输血 2 组。 按新鲜冰冻血浆与红细胞的比率计算,大量输血 1 组和大量输血 2 组在所有时间段的均衡输血率均接近 100%。然而,按 6 小时内 PC 与 RBC 的比例计算,第 1 组的平衡输血率为 51.0%,第 2 组为 68.4%。 结论 本研究显示,虽然 FFP 与 RBC 的比例从早期阶段开始就在患者中保持平衡,但 PC 与 RBC 的比例并不完全平衡,尤其是在早期阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of urinary culture on diagnosis and treatment strategy after empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients Adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients: A post hoc analysis of the RESTRIC trial Increased number of dispatches in emergency medical services correlates to response time extension Successful transition from intravenous to inhalation anesthesia for respiratory management of coronavirus disease pneumonia: A case report Early do-not-attempt resuscitation orders and neurological outcomes in older out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient: A multicenter observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1