Comparative Assessment of Simoa and Lumipulse for Measuring Serum Neurofilament Light Chain in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1155/2024/1950913
Raquel Gasque-Rubio, Laura Cubas-Nuñez, Jordi Tortosa-Carreres, Lorena Forés-Toribio, Jéssica Castillo-Villalba, Sara Carratalá-Boscá, Carmen Alcalá-Vicente, Carlos Quintanilla-Bordás, David Gorriz, Francisco Gascón-Gimenez, Guillermo Cervera-Ygual, José Andrés Dominguez-Morán, María Carcelén-Gadea, Begoña Laiz Marro, Bonaventura Casanova, Francisco Pérez-Miralles
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Simoa and Lumipulse for Measuring Serum Neurofilament Light Chain in Multiple Sclerosis Patients","authors":"Raquel Gasque-Rubio,&nbsp;Laura Cubas-Nuñez,&nbsp;Jordi Tortosa-Carreres,&nbsp;Lorena Forés-Toribio,&nbsp;Jéssica Castillo-Villalba,&nbsp;Sara Carratalá-Boscá,&nbsp;Carmen Alcalá-Vicente,&nbsp;Carlos Quintanilla-Bordás,&nbsp;David Gorriz,&nbsp;Francisco Gascón-Gimenez,&nbsp;Guillermo Cervera-Ygual,&nbsp;José Andrés Dominguez-Morán,&nbsp;María Carcelén-Gadea,&nbsp;Begoña Laiz Marro,&nbsp;Bonaventura Casanova,&nbsp;Francisco Pérez-Miralles","doi":"10.1155/2024/1950913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background</b>: The assessment of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is increasingly significant in the field of neurology. In multiple sclerosis (MS), it proves valuable as a marker for monitoring disease activity and treatment response.</p><p><b>Objective</b>: To compare the Simoa and Lumipulse platforms for measuring sNfL and to establish age-specific reference ranges within a substantial cohort of individuals diagnosed with MS.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Two hundred sixty-one sNfL measurements from a cohort of 229 MS patients were analyzed with Simoa and Lumipulse. Reference ranges for sNfL were established for three age groups (18–39 years, 40–59 years, and &gt; 60 years) selecting data from 166 patients with stable relapsing–remitting MS.</p><p><b>Results:</b> While sNfL levels correlated between assays, Lumipulse exhibited values higher than Simoa. Passing–Bablok’s analysis confirmed linearity between the two datasets, and the Bland–Altman comparison further supported the agreement between the methods. Analyzing reference ranges for sNfL across three age groups in stable RRMS patients revealed significant differences between the groups on each of the platforms. Although the values followed the same trend, each technology utilized distinct reference ranges.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Simoa and Lumipulse platforms proved equally effective in monitoring patients with MS. The enhanced accessibility of the Lumipulse platform facilitates the expansion of research on sNfL as a biomarker for monitoring MS, thus offering promising opportunities for broader accessibility and advancement in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1950913","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1950913","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The assessment of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is increasingly significant in the field of neurology. In multiple sclerosis (MS), it proves valuable as a marker for monitoring disease activity and treatment response.

Objective: To compare the Simoa and Lumipulse platforms for measuring sNfL and to establish age-specific reference ranges within a substantial cohort of individuals diagnosed with MS.

Methods: Two hundred sixty-one sNfL measurements from a cohort of 229 MS patients were analyzed with Simoa and Lumipulse. Reference ranges for sNfL were established for three age groups (18–39 years, 40–59 years, and > 60 years) selecting data from 166 patients with stable relapsing–remitting MS.

Results: While sNfL levels correlated between assays, Lumipulse exhibited values higher than Simoa. Passing–Bablok’s analysis confirmed linearity between the two datasets, and the Bland–Altman comparison further supported the agreement between the methods. Analyzing reference ranges for sNfL across three age groups in stable RRMS patients revealed significant differences between the groups on each of the platforms. Although the values followed the same trend, each technology utilized distinct reference ranges.

Conclusion: Simoa and Lumipulse platforms proved equally effective in monitoring patients with MS. The enhanced accessibility of the Lumipulse platform facilitates the expansion of research on sNfL as a biomarker for monitoring MS, thus offering promising opportunities for broader accessibility and advancement in this field.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simoa 和 Lumipulse 在测量多发性硬化症患者血清神经丝轻链方面的比较评估
背景:血清神经丝轻链(sNfL)的评估在神经病学领域越来越重要。在多发性硬化症(MS)中,它被证明是监测疾病活动和治疗反应的重要标志物:目的:比较 Simoa 和 Lumipulse 测量 sNfL 的平台,并在大量确诊为多发性硬化症的人群中建立特定年龄的参考范围:使用Simoa和Lumipulse分析了229名多发性硬化症患者的261次sNfL测量结果。选择 166 名稳定的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的数据,为三个年龄组(18-39 岁、40-59 岁和 60 岁)确定了 sNfL 的参考范围:结果:虽然不同检测方法的 sNfL 水平存在相关性,但 Lumipulse 的检测值高于 Simoa。Passing-Bablok 分析证实了两个数据集之间的线性关系,Bland-Altman 比较进一步证实了两种方法之间的一致性。分析稳定期 RRMS 患者三个年龄组的 sNfL 参考范围发现,每个平台上的组间差异都很大。虽然数值趋势相同,但每种技术都采用了不同的参考范围:Simoa和Lumipulse平台在监测多发性硬化症患者方面同样有效。Lumipulse 平台的易用性增强,有利于扩大将 sNfL 作为监测多发性硬化症的生物标记物的研究,从而为该领域更广泛的易用性和进步提供了大好机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
期刊最新文献
Burden of Episodic and Chronic Migraine in Patients Who Had Failed Multiple Preventive Treatments From France, Spain, and the United Kingdom Brain Morphometry Differences Between Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Healthy Individuals in a Middle Eastern Population: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study Titin Antibody Is Linked to Increased Hospitalization Rates in Nonthymoma Myasthenia Gravis in Central China The Association of Salivary Cortisol Levels With Depression, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Male Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Case-Control Study Impact of Depression on Cognitive Function and Phenoconversion to Neurodegenerative Diseases in Patients With Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1